Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Jul 2;21(11):e886–e894. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.021

Table 4.

Tumor Response Evaluation (Investigator Assessment; Full Analysis Set With Postbaseline Tumor Assessment)

Copanlisib Plus R-B SRI (N = 10) Copanlisib Plus R-CHOP SRI (N = 10a)
Best overall response
 Complete response 5 (50.0)b [18.7, 81.3] 3 (30.0) [6.7, 65.2]
 Partial response 4 (40.0)c [12.2, 73.8] 7 (70.0)b [34.8, 93.3]
 Stable disease 1 (10.0) [0.3, 44.5] 0 [0.0, 30.8]
 Progressive disease 0 [0.0, 30.8] 0 [0.0, 30.8]
Objective response rate 9 (90.0) [55.5, 99.7] 10 (100) [69.2, 100]

Data are presented as n (%) [95% CI].

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; R-B = rituximab plus bendamustine; R-CHOP = rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; SRI = safety run-in.

a

11 patients were treated, but 1 patient was not included because their first postbaseline tumor assessment was reached after the data cut-off date.

b

1 patient had their first postbaseline tumor assessment outside of the protocol-required 12-week (± 1 week) assessment period.

c

2 patients had their first postbaseline tumor assessment outside of the protocol-required 12-week (± 1 week) assessment period.