Table 2.
Hypothesis testing.
| Hypothesized Paths | Coefficients | t-Values |
|---|---|---|
| H1: GHRM → GOCB | 0.564 | 2.691 ** |
| H2: GHRM → GA | 0.826 | 7.941 *** |
| H3: GA → GOCB | 0.341 | 3.780 *** |
| H5: GHRM → PGC | 0.592 | 7.428 *** |
| H6: PGC → GOCB | 0.154 | 2.201 ** |
| H8: GOCB → GCSR | 0.431 | 4.142 *** |
| H9: GCSR → GPM | 0.250 | 2.235 ** |
| H10: GOCB → GPM | 0.870 | 8.606 *** |
| H1: GHRM → GOCB | 0.564 | 2.691 ** |
| H2: GHRM → GA | 0.826 | 7.941 *** |
| H3: GA → GOCB | 0.341 | 3.780 *** |
| Indirect effect | Total effect | |
| H4: GHRM → GA → GOCB | 0.265 *** | 0.957 *** |
| H7: GHRM → PGC → GOCB | 0.138 * | 0.821 *** |
| H11: GOCB → GCSR → GPM | 0.030 ** | 0.299 *** |
| Explained variable: | R2(GA) = 0.593, R2(PGC) = 0.381, R2(GOCB) = 0.626, R2(GPM) = 0.508, R2(GCSR) = 0.374 |
Note 1. green HRM practice (GHRM), green awareness (GA), green psychological climate (GPC), green organizational citizenship behavior (GOCB), green performance management (GPM), green CSR perception (GCSR). Note 2. Goodness-of-fit statistics for the measurement model: χ2 = 802.227, df = 694, p < 0.001, χ2/df = 1.156, RMSEA = 0.022, CFI = 0.985, IFI = 0.985, TLI = 0.982, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Note 3. All factors’ loadings are significant at p < 0.001.