Table 3.
Ranges of prey size and associated least squares regression statistics (±95%CL) for the scaling equations of log-transformed values of prey mass (g) as a function of prey cross-sectional area (cm2).
| Prey species | n | mass (g) | diam (cm) | area (cm2) | slope | intercept | R 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rat | 21 | 6.6–650 | 1.4–5.8 | 1.4–26.0 | 1.534 ± 0.093 | 0.675 ± 0.081 | 0.984 |
| rabbit | 17 | 237–4472 | 4.2–11.7 | 14–117 | 1.405 ± 0.072 | 0.772 ± 0.124 | 0.991 |
| raccoon | 8 | 2110–6980 | 8.5–15.2 | 56–181 | 1.039 ± 0.227 | 1.542 ± 0.447 | 0.954 |
| chicken | 13 | 41–2720 | 2.8–12.7 | 6.6–147 | 1.404 ± 0.048 | 0.398 ± 0.077 | 0.997 |
| iguana | 21 | 26–4810 | 1.8–11.2 | 2.4–98.5 | 1.381 ± 0.039 | 0.926 ± 0.052 | 0.996 |
| alligator | 11 | 190–26,600 | 3.6–19.2 | 10–289 | 1.445 ± 0.097 | 0.865 ± 0.188 | 0.996 |
| deer* | 9 | 2750–58,600 | 10.9–35.6 (H) 7.6–29.9 (W) |
65–804 | 1.156 ± 0.397 | 1.469 ± 1.040 | 0.872 |
All P-values for the test of the overall significance of the regression were less than 10–3. *Area calculated for an ellipse using height (H) and width (W) as the major and minor axes. See Table S3 for ANCOVA results comparing species.