Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;4(1):obac033. doi: 10.1093/iob/obac033

Table 3.

Ranges of prey size and associated least squares regression statistics (±95%CL) for the scaling equations of log-transformed values of prey mass (g) as a function of prey cross-sectional area (cm2).

Prey species n mass (g) diam (cm) area (cm2) slope intercept R 2
rat 21 6.6–650 1.4–5.8 1.4–26.0 1.534 ± 0.093 0.675 ± 0.081 0.984
rabbit 17 237–4472 4.2–11.7 14–117 1.405 ± 0.072 0.772 ± 0.124 0.991
raccoon 8 2110–6980 8.5–15.2 56–181 1.039 ± 0.227 1.542 ± 0.447 0.954
chicken 13 41–2720 2.8–12.7 6.6–147 1.404 ± 0.048 0.398 ± 0.077 0.997
iguana 21 26–4810 1.8–11.2 2.4–98.5 1.381 ± 0.039 0.926 ± 0.052 0.996
alligator 11 190–26,600 3.6–19.2 10–289 1.445 ± 0.097 0.865 ± 0.188 0.996
deer* 9 2750–58,600 10.9–35.6 (H)
7.6–29.9 (W)
65–804 1.156 ± 0.397 1.469 ± 1.040 0.872

All P-values for the test of the overall significance of the regression were less than 10–3. *Area calculated for an ellipse using height (H) and width (W) as the major and minor axes. See Table S3 for ANCOVA results comparing species.