Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 25;17(8):e0273339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273339

Table 2. Associations between pregnancy intention and psychological distress by level of COVID-19 transmission rates and lockdown restrictions, N = 849.

Outcome: log-transformed psychological distress score Outcome: high/very high vs low/moderate psychological distress
n (%) Unadjusted
Coefficient (95% CI)
Adjusted1
Coefficient (95% CI)
Unadjusted
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Adjusted1
Odds ratio (95% CI)
Overall study population, n = 849
Not planning to become pregnant 693 (81.6) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Planning to become pregnant 156 (18.4) 0.11 (0.04, 0.18) 0.05 (-0.02, 0.12) 1.74 (1.23, 2.47) 1.42 (0.94, 2.11)
Women exposed to high viral transmission rates and strict lockdown restrictions, n = 203
Not planning to become pregnant 161 (79.3) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Planning to become pregnant 42 (20.7) 0.22 (0.08, 0.35) 0.20 (0.05, 0.34) 3.32 (2.16, 5.11) 3.39 (2.04, 5.65)
Women exposed to low viral transmission rates and less strict lockdown restrictions, n = 646
Not planning to become pregnant 532 (82.4) Reference Reference Reference Reference
Planning to become pregnant 114 (17.6) 0.06 (-0.02, 0.15) 0.02 (-0.08, 0.10) 1.39 (0.93, 2.09) 1.17 (0.74, 1.85)

Results are based on imputed data where missing data were imputed using the MICE method [29].

1 Adjusted for age group, marital status, location (overall study population only), highest level of education completed, annual household income before tax, food affordability, employment prior to the pandemic, number of children in the household, alcohol consumption, body mass index.