Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 28;9(8):241. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080241

Table 7.

List of studies investigating the role of exercise training in patients with preserved ejection fraction.

First Author; Year of Publication (Ref.) Study Design; Duration (wk) Type of Exercise Patient; Age; Women (%) Principal Outcomes Investigated and Main Findings
Kitzman2010 [78] Randomized, prospective, attention-controlled, single-blind study
16 wk
1 h ET (warm-up, stimulus, and cool-down phases), 3 times/wk ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Echocardiographic parameters

  • 6MWT distance Inline graphic

  • Natriuretic peptides

  • QoL scores Inline graphic

N = 26 N = 27
70 ± 6 y 69 ± 5 y
83% 91%
Edelmann2011 [70] Prospective, randomized 2:1 controlled trial
12 wk
Endurance/resistance training ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Echocardiographic parameters Inline graphic

  • 6MWT distance

  • QoL scores

N = 44 N = 20
64± 8 y 65 ± 6 y
55% 60%
Smart2012 [74] Randomized, controlled trial
16 wk
Cycle ergometer exercise training at 60 rpm ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Echocardiographic parameters Inline graphic

  • QoL scores

N = 12 N = 13
67 ± 5.8 y 61.9 ± 6.9 y
42% 53%
Murad2012 [84] Randomized, controlled, single-blinded design
16 wk
1 h ET (warm-up, stimulus, and cool-down phases), 3 times/wk ET UC
  • SDNN Inline graphic

  • RMSSD Inline graphic

N = 35 N = 31
70.1 ± 5.6 y 68.0 ± 4.8 y
63% 64.5%
Alves2012 [79] Randomized controlled trial
24 wk
Interval training ET UC
  • Exercise tolerance (MET) Inline graphic

  • Echocardiographic parameters Inline graphic

N = 20 N = 11
Overall
63 ± 11 y
29%
Haykowsky2012 [68] Randomized, single-blind trial
16 wk
Endurance exercise training ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Echocardiographic parameters

N = 22 N = 18
70 ± 6 y 68 ± 5 y
82 % 94%
Fujimoto2012 [67] Randomized controlled trial
54 wk
Endurance exercise training ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters

  • Echocardiographic parameters

  • Cardiac catheterization measurements

N = 7 N = 13
74.9 ± 6 y 70.2 ± 4 y
57% 38%
Kitzman2013 [66] Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial
16 wk
Walking, arm, and leg ergometry ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters

  • Echocardiographic parameters Inline graphic

  • Brachial artery

  • FMD

  • QoL scores

N = 32 N = 31
70 ± 7 y 70 ± 7 y
72% 80%
Angadi2015 [75] Randomized comparison trial/pilot study
4 wk
HIIT vs. MI-ACT HIIT MCT
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Diastolic functionInline graphic

  • FMD

N = 9 N = 6
69.0 ± 6.1 y 71.5 ± 11.7 y
11% 33%
Nolte2015 [83] Prospective, randomized, controlled trial
12 wk
Endurance/resistance training ET UC
  • QoL scores Inline graphic

N = 44 N = 20
overall
65 ± 7 y
56%
Kitzman2016 [73] Randomized, attention- controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trail
20 wk
Walking exercise 3 times/wk ET Diet group
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • QoL scores

N = 26 N = 24
ET + Diet group UC
N = 25 N = 25
Overall
67 ± 5 y
81%
Fu2016 [72] Randomized, controlled trial
12 wk
Aerobic interval training ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Echocardiographic parameters

  • QoL scores Inline graphic

N = 30 N = 30
60.5 ± 2.7 y 63.1 ± 2.6 y
33% 40%
Maldonado-Martin2017 [69] Prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial
16 wk
Cycling and walking at 50% to 70% of VO2 peak intensity ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • 6MWT distance

N = 23 N = 24
>65 y
87%
Lang2018 [83] Randomized controlled trial
12 wk
Home-based comprehensive self-management rehabilitation program ET UC
  • QoL scores Inline graphic

N = 25 N = 25
71.8 ± 9.9 y 76 ± 6.6 y
64% 44%
Donelli da Silveira2020 [76] Single-blinded, parallel randomized clinical trial
3 d per wk 12 wk
HIIT vs. MCT HIIT MCT
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Echocardiographic data

  • Natriuretic peptides Inline graphic

  • QoL scores Inline graphic

N = 10 N = 9
60 ± 10 y 60 ± 9 y
70% 56%
Brubaker2020 [71] Randomized controlled trial 16 wk ≤60 min of moderate-intensity endurance exercise training 3 time/wk ET UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • 6MWT distance Inline graphic

  • QoL scores

N = 58 N = 58
70.3 ± 6.7 69.2 ± 6.2
76% 86%
Mueller2021 [77] Randomized controlled trial 3 mo supervised followed by 9 mo of telemedical monitored home-based training HIIT vs. MCT vs. UC HIIT MCT UC
  • CPET functional parameters Inline graphic

  • Diastolic function

  • Natriuretic peptides

  • QoL scores

N = 58 N = 58 N = 60
70 ± 7 y 70 ± 8 y 69 ±10 y
71% 60% 68%

Abbreviations: ET, exercise training; wk, weeks; CPET: cardiopulmonary exercise test; 6MWT: 6 min walking test; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; IMT, inspiratory muscle training; MET, metabolic equivalent task; MCT: moderate continuous training; MI-ACT, moderate-intensity aerobic continuous training; QoL, quality of life; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences in normal RR intervals; SDNN, standard deviation of all normal RR intervals; UC, usual care. The blue arrows indicate an improvement after exercise of the variable explored