Table 7.
List of studies investigating the role of exercise training in patients with preserved ejection fraction.
First Author; Year of Publication (Ref.) | Study Design; Duration (wk) | Type of Exercise | Patient; Age; Women (%) | Principal Outcomes Investigated and Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kitzman2010 [78] | Randomized, prospective, attention-controlled, single-blind study 16 wk |
1 h ET (warm-up, stimulus, and cool-down phases), 3 times/wk | ET UC |
|
N = 26 N = 27 | ||||
70 ± 6 y 69 ± 5 y | ||||
83% 91% | ||||
Edelmann2011 [70] | Prospective, randomized 2:1 controlled trial 12 wk |
Endurance/resistance training | ET UC |
|
N = 44 N = 20 | ||||
64± 8 y 65 ± 6 y | ||||
55% 60% | ||||
Smart2012 [74] | Randomized, controlled trial 16 wk |
Cycle ergometer exercise training at 60 rpm | ET UC |
|
N = 12 N = 13 | ||||
67 ± 5.8 y 61.9 ± 6.9 y | ||||
42% 53% | ||||
Murad2012 [84] | Randomized, controlled, single-blinded design 16 wk |
1 h ET (warm-up, stimulus, and cool-down phases), 3 times/wk | ET UC |
|
N = 35 N = 31 | ||||
70.1 ± 5.6 y 68.0 ± 4.8 y | ||||
63% 64.5% | ||||
Alves2012 [79] | Randomized controlled trial 24 wk |
Interval training | ET UC |
|
N = 20 N = 11 | ||||
Overall | ||||
63 ± 11 y | ||||
29% | ||||
Haykowsky2012 [68] | Randomized, single-blind trial 16 wk |
Endurance exercise training | ET UC |
|
N = 22 N = 18 | ||||
70 ± 6 y 68 ± 5 y | ||||
82 % 94% | ||||
Fujimoto2012 [67] | Randomized controlled trial 54 wk |
Endurance exercise training | ET UC |
|
N = 7 N = 13 | ||||
74.9 ± 6 y 70.2 ± 4 y | ||||
57% 38% | ||||
Kitzman2013 [66] | Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial 16 wk |
Walking, arm, and leg ergometry | ET UC |
|
N = 32 N = 31 | ||||
70 ± 7 y 70 ± 7 y | ||||
72% 80% | ||||
Angadi2015 [75] | Randomized comparison trial/pilot study 4 wk |
HIIT vs. MI-ACT | HIIT MCT |
|
N = 9 N = 6 | ||||
69.0 ± 6.1 y 71.5 ± 11.7 y | ||||
11% 33% | ||||
Nolte2015 [83] | Prospective, randomized, controlled trial 12 wk |
Endurance/resistance training | ET UC |
|
N = 44 N = 20 | ||||
overall | ||||
65 ± 7 y | ||||
56% | ||||
Kitzman2016 [73] | Randomized, attention- controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trail 20 wk |
Walking exercise 3 times/wk | ET Diet group |
|
N = 26 N = 24 | ||||
ET + Diet group UC | ||||
N = 25 N = 25 | ||||
Overall | ||||
67 ± 5 y | ||||
81% | ||||
Fu2016 [72] | Randomized, controlled trial 12 wk |
Aerobic interval training | ET UC |
|
N = 30 N = 30 | ||||
60.5 ± 2.7 y 63.1 ± 2.6 y | ||||
33% 40% | ||||
Maldonado-Martin2017 [69] | Prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial 16 wk |
Cycling and walking at 50% to 70% of VO2 peak intensity | ET UC |
|
N = 23 N = 24 | ||||
>65 y | ||||
87% | ||||
Lang2018 [83] | Randomized controlled trial 12 wk |
Home-based comprehensive self-management rehabilitation program | ET UC |
|
N = 25 N = 25 | ||||
71.8 ± 9.9 y 76 ± 6.6 y | ||||
64% 44% | ||||
Donelli da Silveira2020 [76] | Single-blinded, parallel randomized clinical trial 3 d per wk 12 wk |
HIIT vs. MCT | HIIT MCT |
|
N = 10 N = 9 | ||||
60 ± 10 y 60 ± 9 y | ||||
70% 56% | ||||
Brubaker2020 [71] | Randomized controlled trial 16 wk | ≤60 min of moderate-intensity endurance exercise training 3 time/wk | ET UC |
|
N = 58 N = 58 | ||||
70.3 ± 6.7 69.2 ± 6.2 | ||||
76% 86% | ||||
Mueller2021 [77] | Randomized controlled trial 3 mo supervised followed by 9 mo of telemedical monitored home-based training | HIIT vs. MCT vs. UC | HIIT MCT UC |
|
N = 58 N = 58 N = 60 | ||||
70 ± 7 y 70 ± 8 y 69 ±10 y | ||||
71% 60% 68% |
Abbreviations: ET, exercise training; wk, weeks; CPET: cardiopulmonary exercise test; 6MWT: 6 min walking test; FMD, flow-mediated dilation; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; IMT, inspiratory muscle training; MET, metabolic equivalent task; MCT: moderate continuous training; MI-ACT, moderate-intensity aerobic continuous training; QoL, quality of life; RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences in normal RR intervals; SDNN, standard deviation of all normal RR intervals; UC, usual care. The blue arrows indicate an improvement after exercise of the variable explored