Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;8(8):820. doi: 10.3390/jof8080820

Table 6.

Neutrality tests statistics observed in current study.

Test Method PB HR RJ WB
S * p S p S p S p
Tajima’s D 0.809 p > 0.10 0.037 p > 0.10 0.614 p > 0.10 −0.978 p > 0.10
Fu and Li’s D 2.176 p < 0.02 1.857 p < 0.02 1.638 p < 0.02 0.356 p > 0.10
Fu and Li’s F 1.988 p < 0.02 1.486 p < 0.10 1.535 p < 0.10 −0.064 p > 0.10
Fu’s Fs 24.788 11.400 6.389 13.859

S * represents statistics of Tajima’s D, Fu and Li’s D, Fu and Li’s F and Fu’s Fs; p < 0.05 indicates significant differences, rejecting the null hypothesis; p > 0.10 indicates no significant differences, following the neutrality model; PB: Punjab; HR: Haryana; RJ: Rajasthan; and WB: West Bengal.