Table 6.
Neutrality tests statistics observed in current study.
Test Method | PB | HR | RJ | WB | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S * | p | S | p | S | p | S | p | |
Tajima’s D | 0.809 | p > 0.10 | 0.037 | p > 0.10 | 0.614 | p > 0.10 | −0.978 | p > 0.10 |
Fu and Li’s D | 2.176 | p < 0.02 | 1.857 | p < 0.02 | 1.638 | p < 0.02 | 0.356 | p > 0.10 |
Fu and Li’s F | 1.988 | p < 0.02 | 1.486 | p < 0.10 | 1.535 | p < 0.10 | −0.064 | p > 0.10 |
Fu’s Fs | 24.788 | 11.400 | 6.389 | 13.859 |
S * represents statistics of Tajima’s D, Fu and Li’s D, Fu and Li’s F and Fu’s Fs; p < 0.05 indicates significant differences, rejecting the null hypothesis; p > 0.10 indicates no significant differences, following the neutrality model; PB: Punjab; HR: Haryana; RJ: Rajasthan; and WB: West Bengal.