Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 22;11(16):4929. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164929

Table 5.

Risk stratification of CLNM and LLNM for PTMC patients within Uni and Bil groups.

Low Risk (TS ≤ 100) Moderate Risk (100 < TS < 180) High Risk (TS ≥ 180)
(n = 197, %) (n = 212, %) (n = 173, %) p Value
Uni group ALL patients (n = 582) Negative CLNM 173 (87.8) 144 (67.9) 33 (19.1) 0.000
Positive CLNM 24 (12.2) 68 (32.1) 140 (80.9)
Low risk (TS ≤ 100) High risk (TS > 100)
(n = 196, %) (n = 36, %) p value
Patients with positive CLNM (n = 232) Negative LLNM 192 (98.0) 10 (27.8) 0.000
Positive LLNM 4 (2.0) 26 (72.2)
Low risk (TS < 80) Moderate risk (80 ≤ TS < 100) High risk (TS ≥ 100)
(n = 14, %) (n = 31, %) (n = 90, %) p value
Bil group All patients (n = 135) Negative LLNM 14 (100.0) 22 (71.0) 24 (26.7) 0.000
Positive LLNM 0 (0.0) 9 (29.0) 66 (73.3)
No risk factor iNG only MDCLN > 0.5 cm only Both two risk factors
(n = 35, %) (n = 10, %) (n = 19, %) (n = 11, %) p value
Patients with positive CLNM (n = 75) Negative LLNM 34 (97.1) 8 (80.0) 11 (57.9) 3 (27.3) 0.000
Positive LLNM 1 (2.9) 2 (20.0) 8 (42.1) 8 (72.7)

PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; CLNM, central lymph node metastasis; LLNM, lateral lymph node metastasis; iNG, ipsilateral nodular goiter; MDCLN, maximum diameter of positive central lymph node.