Skip to main content
. 1999 Sep;181(18):5876–5879. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.18.5876-5879.1999

TABLE 1.

Sulfonate specificity and kinetic parameters for sulfonate/α-KG dioxygenase

Substratea Vmax (μmol/min/mg) Km (mM) kcat/Km (min−1/mM) Ki (mM)
3-N-Morpholinopropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (0–20 mM) 1.80 ± 0.06 0.24 ± 0.02 670.9 34.3 ± 5.8b
N-Phenyltaurine (0–3 mM) 0.81 ± 0.03 0.12 ± 0.01 606.4 1.5 ± 0.1b
2-Hydroxyethanesulfonate (isethionate) (0–20 mM) 1.26 ± 0.05 0.27 ± 0.05 418.4 20.3 ± 2.5b
3-Morpholino-2-hydroxypropanesulfonic acid (MOPSO) (0–20 mM) 1.51 ± 0.03 0.33 ± 0.02 411.2 28.4 ± 2.4b
Taurocholate (0–10 mM) 0.99 ± 0.05 0.42 ± 0.05 210.7 8.2 ± 1.1b
2-(4-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES) (0–20 mM) 1.48 ± 0.05 1.94 ± 0.14 68.4 45.2 ± 6.6b
2-(Cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic acid (CHES) (0–20 mM) 0.56 ± 0.02 2.57 ± 0.34 19.6 c
N-(Tris[hydroxymethyl]methyl)-2-amino-ethanesulfonic acid (TES) (0–15 mM) 0.75 ± 0.01 3.60 ± 0.12 18.7 c
N-[2-Hydroxyethyl] piperazine-N′-[2-hydroxy-propanesulfonic acid] (HEPPSO) (0–20 mM) 1.01 ± 0.08 5.04 ± 1.07 18.0 c
N-(Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl)-3-aminopropane sulfonic acid (TAPS) (0–20 mM) 1.61 ± 0.06 10.38 ± .80 13.9 c
4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) (0–20 mM) 0.82 ± 0.02 16.62 ± 0.80 4.4 c
2-Aminoethanesulfonic acid (taurine) (0–20 mM) 0.46 ± 0.04 10.37 ± 1.82 4.0 c
a

The concentrations of substrates examined are shown in parentheses. 

b

Data for these substrates were fit to the equation given in the text. 

c

No inhibition was detected. Kinetic parameters were fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation.