Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;9(8):412. doi: 10.3390/vetsci9080412

Table 2.

Comparison of the used PCR approaches.

Method Sporocysts
Isolation
gDNA
Extraction
Number
of Water
Samples (n)
Positive
Samples *
Cases Species
Detected ****
Positive ** False
Positive ***
Direct PCR
(species-specific
primers)
Sucrose
gradient
“GeneJET Genomic DNA
Purification Kit”
20 0 (0.0%) 0 0 0
Nested PCR
(species-specific
primers only in
2nd round of PCR)
Sucrose
gradient
“GeneJET Genomic DNA
Purification Kit”
35 8 (22.9%) 12 2 2
Sedimentation “Genomic DNA
Purification Kit”
35 3 (8.6%) 4 1 2
Filtration “GeneJET Genomic DNA
Purification Kit”
35 14 (40.0%) 15 1 3
Multiplex-nested PCR
(species-specific
primers only in 2nd round of PCR)
Filtration “GeneJET Genomic DNA
Purification Kit”
35 7 (20.0%) 10 3 2
Semi-nested PCR
(species-specific
primers)
Filtration “GeneJET Genomic DNA
Purification Kit”
35 0 (0.0%) 0 0 0
Nested PCR
(species-specific
primers in both rounds)
Filtration “GeneJET Genomic DNA
Purification Kit”
35 34 (97.1%) 84 0 8

* The number of samples in which at least one of targeted Sarcocystis species was identified. ** The number of positive PCR fragments. *** Based on sequencing the number of incorrectly identified species. **** Based on sequencing the number of targeted species identified in samples.