Table 2.
Differences in adherence at each time point among the men who have sex with men population in the no-reminder group and reminder group.
|
|
No-reminder group | Reminder group | P valuea | |||||||
|
|
n | Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) | n | Mean (SD) | Median (IQR) |
|
|||
| Initial adherence (N=716) | 372 | 0.75 (0.37) | 1.00 (0.64-1.00) | 344 | 0.72 (0.39) | 1.00 (0.47-1.00) | .48 | |||
| After using the reminder system | ||||||||||
|
|
Early stage adherence (n=410) | 217 | 0.80 (0.33) | 1.00 (0.79-1.00) | 193 | 0.76 (0.37) | 1.00 (0.64-1.00) | .69 | ||
|
|
Midterm adherence (n=193) | 100 | 0.77 (0.37) | 100 (0.68-1.00) | 93 | 0.78 (0.35) | 1.00 (0.79-1.00) | .96 | ||
|
|
Late stage adherence (n=76) | 41 | 0.79 (0.31) | 1.00 (0.64-1.00) | 35 | 0.88 (0.23) | 1.00 (0.79-1.00) | .37 | ||
|
|
Average adherence (n=410) | 217 | 0.79 (0.31) | 0.93 (0.72-1.00) | 193 | 0.78 (0.32) | 0.97 (0.64-1.00) | .82 | ||
aKruskal-Wallis test was used.