Table 4.
Metagenomic fecal microbiome sequence data for Chlamydia muridarum
| Sample Totals | Institution Totals | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category/ Region | #Samples | #Positive | %Positive | #Institutions | #Positive | %Positive | |
| Academic | 11,106 | 383 | 3% | 112 | 17 | 15% | |
| Australia | 115 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 0 | 0% | |
| Europe | 728 | 47 | 7% | 23 | 3* | 13% | |
| Institution A* | 8 | 2 | 25% | ||||
| Institution B* | 39 | 7 | 18% | ||||
| Institution C* | 52 | 38 | 73% | ||||
| Northeast US | 976 | 223 | 23% | 27 | 5* | 16% | |
| Institution D* | 10 | 8 | 80% | ||||
| Institution E* | 11 | 11 | 100% | ||||
| Institution F* | 36 | 6 | 17% | ||||
| Institution G* | 68 | 32 | 47% | ||||
| Institution H* | 524 | 166 | 32% | ||||
| Midwest US | 1,603 | 15 | 1% | 20 | 1* | 5% | |
| Institution I* | 45 | 15 | 33% | ||||
| Southern US | 7,003 | 46 | 1% | 18 | 5 | 28% | |
| Institution J* | 30 | 3 | 10% | ||||
| Institution K* | 16 | 6 | 38% | ||||
| Institution L* | 40 | 5 | 13% | ||||
| Institution M* | 53 | 4 | 8% | ||||
| Institution N* | 4,756 | 28 | 1% | ||||
| Western US | 681 | 7 | 1% | 19 | 3* | 16% | |
| Institution O* | 3 | 1 | 33% | ||||
| Institution P* | 5 | 5 | 100% | ||||
| Institution Q* | 82 | 1 | 1% | ||||
| Commercial | 429 | 0 | 0% | 8 | 0 | 0% | |
| Canada | 20 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0 | 0% | |
| Northeast US | 168 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 0 | 0% | |
| Midwest US | 168 | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0 | 0% | |
| Southern US | 73 | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 11,387 | 383 | 3% | 120 | 17 | 14% | |
*
Sample details for institutions yielding positive results in each region.