Table 2.

Comparison of the results observed by this work with the recent works found in the literature.

Porous Membrane		Contact Angle (°)	Porosity (%)	Mean Pore Size (nm)	Pure Water Flux (L.m−2.h−1)	Rejection (%)	Process	Ref.
Polymer	Pore Former
20% PES	5% PTGM	52.58	81.21	54.91	203.1	93.8% BSA 95.6% SA	UF	This Work
22% PVDF-HFP	5% CNS	87	89.9	NA	35	>99.9% MO	UF (MD)	[17]
20% PES	4% TGF	50.4	73.3	40.59	300	96% BSA	UF	[26]
15% PES	2.5 g PMG	42.04	83	108.28	908	98% BSA	UF	[38]
15% PVC	0.119% MWCNT-g-GO	13.9	81.4	259	254	88.9% COD	NF	[16]
19% PES	2% SLS-CNT; 15% PVP	57	74	64.29	597	95.6% BSA	UF	[39]
17% PES	5% PEG 400; 2% Tween-20	NA	35.31	73.2	36.9	93.3% BSA	UF	[40]
PVDF-HFP	4% LiCl; 10 wt.% glycerol	79	NA	7.85	51	90% Aqueous solution	UF	[41]
PVDF	MOF-199/PEG	85	80.89	50	185.05	94% BSA	UF	[42]
20% PES	0.5% CC–Fe3O4; 1% PVP	52.5	86.3	5.5	36	99% Dye	NF	[43]
0% PES; 14% PAN	4% PVP; 0% DEG	76	55	NA	100	92.47% Humic acid	UF	[44]
15% PSF	0.7% SiO2	71.3	78	10.7	55	99.1% NaCl solutions	RO	[45]