|
|
DESCRIPTION OF ROADBLOCK |
SOLUTION |
|
Leadership and governance
|
|
National guidelines and strategies |
Lack of national guidelines and eHealth strategy. |
Establish national or regional eHealth guidelines and strategy. |
|
Stakeholder engagement |
Poor involvement of critical national stakeholders. |
Inclusive engagement with stakeholders by policymakers, including representatives of patients, practitioners, payers, industry and civil society. |
|
Monitoring and evaluation standards. |
Lack of clear monitoring and evaluation standards. No repeated monitoring of effectiveness, reach and impact of interventions. |
Clear national standards for monitoring and evaluation of DHIs. Long-term monitoring of effectiveness and implications of digital health interventions. ‘unexpected effects’ registry. |
|
Legislation, policy and compliance
|
|
National legislation on data security and access |
Lack of national guidelines on data security and access. Local institutional guidelines are not harmonized. |
Explicit national guidelines on data access and security. Promote harmonization of policies between institutions. |
|
Lack of regulatory approval or guidance |
Lack of regulatory standards; poor health technology assessment (HTA) standards. |
Improve HTA and regulatory standards. |
|
Strategy and investment
|
|
Reimbursement |
Unclear reimbursement pathways for digital technologies. |
Clear reimbursement strategy for DHI. Include economic evaluations in the design phase. |
|
Long-term investment strategy |
Lack of long-term investment strategy for sustainability of digital technologies. |
Include long-term investment strategy as part of national guidelines. |
|
Services and applications
|
|
Contextualisation |
Intervention not adapted to the local context. |
Perform a structured and holistic needs and context assessment before designing and implementing interventions. Health system assessment frameworks might be helpful tools. |
|
Poor usability and design |
Non-user focused design. |
Employ user-centred and co-design principles. Include end-users (practitioners/patients) early in the design phase. |
|
Infrastructure
|
|
National or regional digital infrastructure |
No clear investment in national or regional digital infrastructure. |
Investing in digital health infrastructure should be included as a national policy priority. |
|
Healthcare provider systems |
Local infrastructure does not allow the integration of new DHI. |
Applications should be flexible and available in on- and offline modes. |
|
Standards and interoperability
|
|
Data structure standards |
National and international differences in data collection, storage and definitions standards. |
Promote collective definitions and data storage formats. Emphasise implementation of open data platforms. |
|
Health workforce
|
|
Poor needs assessment |
Poor understanding of the health workforce needs. |
Include clear health system and needs assessment in the design phase of DHIs. |
|
Data literacy |
Lack of understanding of DHI. |
Provider education on the use of digital technology. |
|
Low acceptability |
Lack of perceived effectiveness and use of DHIs. |
Inclusive technology design and education of use. |
|
Patients
|
|
Poor digital literacy and skills |
Lack of understanding of DHI (literacy), or not having physical capabilities to interact with DHI. |
Patient education on the use of digital technology, context specific adaptations of technology to match patients’ physical abilities. |
|
Low acceptability |
Lack of perceived effectiveness and use of DHIs. |
Inclusive technology design, education of use and user acceptance, usefulness and engagement evaluation alongside clinical trials and related research. |
|