Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 26;18(10):579–596. doi: 10.1038/s41582-022-00698-7

Table 4.

Overview of potential biomarkers shared between delirium and dementia: neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies

Biomarker Cohort size Findings Ref.
No delirium, no dementia Dementia only Delirium only DSD
Neuroimaging
2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET 0 4 13 4 Global cortical hypometabolism was observed during delirium (n = 13); post-delirium (n = 6) greater glucose metabolism was observed in the whole brain and bilateral PCC compared with during delirium 129
[18F]Flutemetamol PET 11 0 5 0 Participants with delirium had no evidence of amyloidosis, whereas 6 of 11 control participants did have evidence of amyloidosis 133
Structural MRI 11 0 5 0 Compared with controls, participants with delirium had reduced grey matter volumes and white matter integrity in the right temporal and bilateral medial frontal areas 124
113 0 32 0 Patients who had thinner cortex in ‘AD signature’ regions had greater delirium severity
Resting-state functional MRI 22 0 22 (14 scanned again after resolution of delirium) 0 Increased functional connectivity between the PCC and DLPFC and reversible reduction of functional connectivity of subcortical regions was observed in delirium 122
Other imaging
Cerebral hypoperfusion (transcranial doppler) 14 10 12 8 Flow velocity was lower in participants with DSD than in participants with acute illness without delirium or dementia; flow velocity was lower in participants with DSD than in participants with either AD or delirium alone 120

Note that studies differ in methods and reporting standards, definitions and measures for delirium and dementia used, varying study populations, and presence of different comorbidities. Therefore, we report only positive or negative associations and not effect sizes, which were not directly comparable across studies. AD, Alzheimer disease; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DSD, delirium superimposed on dementia; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex.