Table 1.
Drug | Study | Study Design | Study Year and Location | Malaria Indicators | Safety on Pregnancy Outcomes | Tolerability | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQ | [26] Clerk et al., 2008 | Double-blind, three-arm RCT
|
2004–2007 Ghana |
|
|
Women who received AQ or SPAQ were more likely to report adverse events than were those who received SP. Symptoms were usually mild, including bodily pains and weakness, dizziness, vomiting, and nausea. |
|
MQ | [27] Briand et al., 2009 | Open-label equivalence RCT
|
2005–2008 Benin |
|
|
|
MQ proved to be highly efficacious for use as IPTp. Its low tolerability might impair its effectiveness. |
[28] González et al., 2014 | Open label, Three-arm, RCT
|
2009–2013 Benin, Gabon, Tanzania, Mozambique |
|
|
|
The results of this study do not support a change in the current recommended IPTp policy. | |
[29] González et al., 2014 | Double-blind two arm RCT:
|
2009–2013 Kenya, Tanzania and Mozambique |
IPTp-MQ was associated with reduced rates of
|
|
Drug tolerability was poorer in the MQ group compared to the control group (dizziness and vomiting after the first IPTp-MQ administration). | Its potential for IPTp is limited given poor drug tolerability and given that MQ was associated with an increased risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. | |
[30] Denoueud-Ndam 2014 et al. (I) | Open label, non-inferiority RCT
|
2009–2011 Benin |
|
No statistically significant differences were either observed regarding birth weight, or prematurity. | Vomiting, nausea, dizziness, and fatigue were more frequently reported with MQ. | Small sample size MQ-IPTp may be an effective alternative given concern about parasite resistance to CTX |
|
[30] Denoueud-Ndam 2014 et al. (II) | Open label, non-RCT
|
2009–2011 Benin |
Because of the small sample size obtained, noninferiority could not be conclusively assessed. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding peripheral parasitemia at delivery and maternal hemoglobin |
No statistically significant differences were either observed regarding birth weight, or prematurity. | Vomiting, nausea, dizziness, and fatigue were more frequently reported with MQ. | MQ-IPTp may be an effective alternative given concern about parasite resistance to CTX | |
[31] Akinyotu et al., 2018 | Open label RCT
|
2016 Nigeria |
|
No statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of preterm birth and LBW. | There was no significant difference in the occurrence of vomiting, gastric pain, headache and dizziness. Nausea was eight times more likely to occur in the MQ group. | Outcomes following use of IPTp-PQ were comparable to IPTp-SP treatment. The authors concluded that MQ is a feasible alternative therapy. | |
DP | [32] Kakuru et al., 2016 | Three-arm, double-blind, RCT
|
2014 Uganda |
|
|
|
IPTp-DP during pregnancy resulted in a lower burden of malaria than did treatment with SP. |
[33] Desai et al., 2016 | Three-arm, open-label RCT
|
2012–2014 Kenya |
|
Women in the IPTp-DP group had fewer stillbirths, and infant mortality than those in the IPTp-SP group. Prevalence of LBW, small for gestational age, and preterm delivery did not differ significantly between groups. |
|
DP is a promising alternative drug to replace SP for IPTp. | |
[34] Natureeba et al., 2017 | Double-blinded, RCT
|
2014–2015 Uganda |
No statistically significant difference in
|
No statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse birth outcomes among both arms. | There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events of any severity. | Adding monthly DP to daily CTX did not reduce the risk of placental or maternal malaria or improve birth outcomes. | |
[35] Kajubi et al., 2019 | Double-blind, RCT
|
2016–2017 Uganda |
IPTp-DP was associated with lower:
|
|
|
Monthly IPTp-DP was safe but did not lead to significant improvements in birth outcomes compared with SP. | |
[36] Mlugu et al., 2021 | Open-label RCT
|
2017–2019 Tanzania |
IPTp-DP was associated with lower:
|
The prevalence of any adverse birth outcomes was not significantly different between groups. The prevalence of LBW was significantly lower in IPTp-DP. |
There was no significant difference in the prevalence of adverse drug events between the treatment groups. | There was a significantly higher protective efficacy of IPTp-DP compared to monthly IPTp-SP. | |
CQ | [37] Divala et al., 2018 | Three arm, open-label, RCT
|
2012–2014 Malawi |
There was no difference in the risk of
|
There were no differences in adverse pregnancy outcomes between arms. | Both CQ treatment regimens were associated with higher rates of treatment-related adverse events than the SP-IPTp regimen. | This study did not have enough superiority evidence of chloroquine either as IPTp or as chemoprophylaxis versus SP-IPTp for prevention of malaria during pregnancy and associated maternal and infant adverse outcomes. |
AZ | [38] Akinyotu et al., 2019 | Open-label RCT
|
2015–2016 Nigeria |
No statistically significant difference in the incidence of malaria parasitaemia at delivery and placental parasitization among arms. | No significant difference in preterm birth and LBW between both arms. | Nausea was significantly higher in the AZ group compared with the SP group. There were no statistically significant differences among groups in the presence of dizziness and headache. | The use of AZ for malaria prevention in HIV-positive pregnant women has a comparable outcome to SP. It is tolerable and has few maternal and foetal adverse effects |
AZSP | [39] Luntamo et al., 2010 | RCT
|
2003–2006 Malawi |
Compared with the controls, participants in the monthly SP and AZSP groups had a statistically significant lower prevalence of peripheral malaria parasitemia at 32 gestation weeks. | IPTp-SPAZ was associated with lower incidence of preterm delivery and LBWIPTp-SPAZ and monthly IPTp-SP were associated with higher mean duration of pregnancy. | Incidence of serious adverse events was low in all groups. | This intervention could be efficacious, but the impact would heavily depend on the local epidemiology and resistance of malaria. |
AZCQ | [40] Kimani et al., 2016 | Open-label RCT
|
2010–2013 Benin, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda |
Statistically significant reduction in
|
There was no significant difference in the incidence of LBW between treatment groups in the IPTp-AZCQ group. | AEs such as vomiting, dizziness, headache, and asthenia were reported more frequently by women receiving IPTp-AZCQ than those receiving IPTp-SP. | IPTp-AZCQ was not superior to IPTp-SP. The study was terminated earlier due to futility. |
AQ: amodiaquine; AQSP: amodiaquine-sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine; IPTp: intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy; LBW: low birth weight; MQ: mefloquine; RCT: randomized clinical trial; SP: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. CTX: cotrimoxazole; IPTp: intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy; LBW: low birth weight; MQ: mefloquine; RCT: randomized clinical trial; SP: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. CTX: cotrimoxazole; DP: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine; IPTp: intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy; IST: intermittent screening and treatment; RCT: randomized clinical trial; SP: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. CQ: chloroquine; DP: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine; IPTp: intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy; LBW: low birthweight; RCT: randomized clinical trial; SP: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. AZ: azithromycin; AZCQ: azithromyicin/chloroquine; AZSP: azithromycin/sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine; IPTp: intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy; LBW: low birthweight; RCT: randomized clinical trial; SP: sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine; w.: week.