Skip to main content
. 2022 May 6;3(8):1417–1422. doi: 10.34067/KID.0002272022

Table 1.

Gene expression profile in the kidney of KLF11+/+ and KLF11−/− mice

Gene Sham IRI
KLF11+/+ KLF11−/− KLF11+/+ KLF11−/−
KLF11 4.01±0.53 ND 4.82±0.35 ND
MCP-1 2.47±0.2 2.23±0.17 17.49±1.56 26.11±2.72a
PAI-1 1.33±0.15 1.34±0.08 24.15±4.27 70.87±12.24b
SMAD3 6.14±0.31 5.87±0.49 9.22±0.6 12.37±0.62c
TNF-α 3.07±0.42 2.12±0.17 16.63±3.29 15.36±2.09
TGF-β1 4.7±0.31 4.06±0.22 13.51±1.23 16.16±1.04
IL-1β 1.07±0.12 1.22±0.26 4.25±0.83 4.75±0.81
ICAM1 6.48±0.3 7.03±0.45 16.76±1.18 16.43±0.67
MMP-9 1.5±0.2 1.41±0.2 11.19±3.26 17.2±2.19
PGC-1α 18.66±0.79 18.05±0.41 9.18±0.63 7.68±0.24a

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed. Shown is mRNA expression of multiple genes in the kidney 1 day after IRI for 22 minutes or sham IRI. Values are the mean±SEM; n=5 for each sham group, and n=6 and 7 for KLF11+/+ and KLF11−/− IRI groups, respectively. Relative quantification was performed against a standard curve constructed for each mRNA target, normalized for expression of 18S rRNA, and expressed in arbitrary units. A t test was used for parametric data, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for nonparametric data. KLF, Krüppel-like factor; ND, not detected; IRI, ischemia-reperfusion injury.

aP<0.05, bP<0.01, cP<0.005, KLF11−/− IRI versus KLF11+/+ IRI.