Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 26;17(8):e0273174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273174

Table 3. The effects (direct and indirect) of antecedent and mediation (prospective IU & inhibitive IU) variables on religiousness in the students’ sample.

Effect on M1 Effect on M2 Direct effect on Y Indirect effect (on Y) mediated by M1 Indirect effect (on Y) mediated by M2
Cof. SE t Cof. SE t Cof. SE t Cof. SE LCI UCI Cof. SE LCI UCI
IUP 0.9 0.13 6.8***
IUI 0.07 0.15 0.5
C1 0.96 0.45 2.1* 0.73 0.39 1.9 -0.89 1.35 -0.7 0.86 0.42 0.07 1.71 0.05 0.13 -0.2 0.36
C2 0.13 0.50 0.3 -0.36 0.43 -0.8 -5.34 1.48 -3.6*** 0.12 0.47 -0.79 1.06 -0.03 0.09 -0.3 0.14
X*M F(2, 816) = 0.2, p = .8 F(2, 816) = 0.8, p = .4
I1 0.69 1.00 0.7 0.34 0.88 0.4 4.48 2.99 1.5 0.62 1.03 -1.37 2.72 0.02 0.15 -0.25 0.39
I2 1.15 0.70 1.7 .82 .61 1.4 4.24 2.07 2.1* 1.03 0.68 -0.21 2.48 0.06 0.16 -0.27 0.42
I3 0.86 0.49 1.8 0.91 0.43 2.1* -0.1 1.47 -0.1 0.77 0.47 -0.14 1.73 0.07 0.16 -0.23 0.43
I4 0.40 0.53 0.8 0.25 0.46 0.6 -1.78 1.57 -1.1 0.36 0.47 -0.52 1.32 0.02 0.08 -0.14 0.22
X*M F(4, 814) = 0.7, p = .6 F(4, 814) = 0.7, p = .6
LQ 0.012 0.005 3.8*** 0.008 0.004 1.9 -0.0 0.015 -0.0 0.017 0.006 0.01 .03 0.001 0.002 -0.002 0.004
X*M F(1, 817) = 0.2, p = .6 F(1, 817) = 0.7, p = .4
Age 0.26 0.06 4.0*** 0.12 0.06 2.1* 0.28 0.19 1.5 0.23 0.07 0.11 0.38 0.01 0.02 -0.03 0.05
X*M F(1, 817) = 0.2, p = .7 F(1, 817) = 0.1, p = .8
RT1 -1.04 1.1 -0.9 -0.29 0.96 -0.3 -0.86 3.29 -0.3 -0.93 1.19 -3.5 1.24 -0.02 0.17 -0.42 0.29
RT2 -1.62 0.92 -1.8 -1.02 0.80 -1.3 1.80 2.74 0.7 -1.45 0.88 -3.31 0.23 -0.07 0.20 -0.56 0.31
RT3 -0.16 0.66 -0.2 0.01 0.57 0.0 2.14 1.95 1.1 -0.14 0.60 -1.35 1.04 0.00 0.09 -0.20 0.22
RT4 -2.3 0.86 -2.7** -2.4 0.75 -3.2** -0.57 2.57 -0.2 -2.06 0.81 -3.69 -0.51 -0.18 0.38 -0.98 0.56
RT5 0.61 0.85 0.7 -1.1 0.74 -1.5 -2.2 2.54 -0.9 0.55 0.81 -1.09 2.11 -0.08 0.21 -0.58 0.29
RT6 0.31 0.56 0.6 -0.42 0.49 -0.9 5.60 1.67 3.4*** 0.28 0.52 -0.75 1.31 -0.03 0.10 -0.29 0.16
X*M F(6, 812) = 1.3, p = .3 F(6, 812) = 0.7, p = .7
R1 -0.20 0.63 -0.32 -0.84 0.55 -1.5 5.49 1.88 2.9** -0.18 0.55 -1.32 0.88 -0.61 0.15 -0.43 0.22
R2 -0.14 0.78 -0.18 1.09 0.68 1.61 12.0 2.32 5.2*** -0.13 0.75 -1.60 1.34 0.08 0.21 -0.30 0.58
X*M F(2, 816) = 0.29, p = .8 F(2, 816) = 2.0, p = .13
Sex 0.64 0.40 1.6 0.25 0.35 0.7 4.1 1.20 3.4*** 0.58 0.37 -0.12 1.34 0.02 0.07 -0.11 0.19
X*M F(1, 817) = 0.0, p = .99 F(1, 817) = 3.34, p = .07
R2 = 0.08, F(17, 820) = 3.91, p < .001 R2 = 0.05, F(17, 820) = 2.57, p < .001 R2 = 0.19, F(19, 818) = 9.98, p < .001

Note. M1 = mediation variable 1 (IUP), M2 = mediation variable 2 (IUI), Y = Dependent variable (religiousness), Cof. = coefficient, SE = standard error, LCI = lower limit of 95% confidence interval, UCI = upper limit of 95% confidence interval, IUP = prospective intolerance of uncertainty, IUI = inhibitive intolerance of uncertainty, C1 = general castes vs. others, C2 = other backward castes vs. scheduled castes, I1 = Income (above vs. below 1lakh), I2 = Income (60 thousand-1Lakh vs. below), I3 = Income (30–60 thousand vs. below), I4 = Income (10–30 thousand vs. below), LQ = laterality quotient, RT1 = Risk-taking (1vs. 2), RT2 = Risk-taking (1vs. 3), RT3 = Risk-taking (1vs. 4), RT4 = Risk-taking (1vs. 5), RT5 = Risk-taking (1vs. 6), RT6 = Risk-taking (1vs. 7), R1 = Hindu vs. Muslim, R2 = Hindu vs. others, X*M = interaction of antecedent (given in above row) and mediation variables (moderation effect); bold values indicate significant indirect effects (not including zero between upper and lower limits of 95% confidence interval).

*** Significant at the .001 level.

** Significant at the .01 level.

* Significant at the .05 level.