Fit results for the TCSPC data acquired on p-terphenyl in Fig. 4c. For the confocal case, we use a bi-exponential fit with a 10 ps (fixed) component to account for the scatter noise. For the ZMW and the NR, we add a supplementary component to obtain a better fit. Ii are the relative intensities of each component and τavg denotes the intensity-averaged lifetime.
τ 1 (ns) | τ 2 (ns) | τ 3 (ns) | I 1 | I 2 | I 3 | τ avg (ns) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Confocal | 0.01 | 0.97 | — | 0.06 | 0.94 | — | 0.91 |
ZWM 70 nm | 0.01 | 0.35 | 0.91 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.57 | 0.62 |
NR 60 × 45 nm2 | 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.91 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.43 |