Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 26;12:14612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18871-9

Table 3.

Univariate analysis of prognostic factors for progression-free and overall survival.

Characteristic PFS, months HR (95% CI)a p-valuea OS, months HR (95% CI)a p-valuea
Gender
Male 4.2 1.233 (0.6–2.7) 0.599 8.1 1.186 (0.5–2.9) 0.704
Female 4.7 11.1
ECOG PS
0–1 4.7 0.652 (0.3–1.6) 0.336 9.3 0.517 (0.2–1.4) 0.182
2 3.5 8.1
Histological grade
G1–G2 4.7 0.424 (0.1–1.9) 0.247 10.6 0.087 (0.1–0.5) 0.001
G3 2.5 3.4
Tumour presentation
Synchronous 4.0 2.391 (0.9–5.7) 0.053 9.3 1.017 (0.4–2.6) 0.971
Metachronous 6.0 10.6
Tumour surgery
No 2.8 1.044 (0.4–3.0) 0.937 5.3 1.396 (0.5–4.3) 0.562
Yes 4.3 9.3
Metastatic sites
< 3 3.0 2.286 (1.0–5.1) 0.001 5.2 2.790 (0.9–7.8) 0.06
≥3 8.2 17.7
Liver metastases
No 17.5 0.309 (0.1–1.1) 0.069 8.1 0.782 (0.2–2.7) 0.696
Yes 4.0 9.3
Peritoneal metastases
No 4.7 0.393 (0.1–0.9) 0.046 9.3 0.437 (0.2–1.0) 0.07
Yes 2.8 5.6
Time from metastatic disease diagnosis
≥18 months 4.3 0.763 (0.3–1.8) 0.523 9.3 0.871 (0.3–2.3) 0.780
 < 18 months 4.8 17.7
Tabernero prognostic classification
Best NR 0.069 NR 0.071
Good 5.0 11.1
Poor 3.5 7.9

CI confidence interval, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, G grade, HR hazard ratio, NR not reached, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival.

aSignificant values are indicated in bold text.