Table 4.
Studies associated with the techno-economic and life cycle assessment of hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol
Technology | Study objectives | Key findings | References |
---|---|---|---|
Route 1: Isothermal hydrogenolysis at high pressure and external hydrogen Route 2: Non-isothermal hydrogenolysis at ambient pressure and external hydrogen. Route 3: Isothermal hydrogenolysis at high pressure and in situ generated hydrogen |
Petroleum-derived propylene oxide production method was compared with three different hydrogenolysis routes. |
|
Gonzalez-Garay et al., (2017) |
Route 1: Propylene glycol production from petroleum-derived feedstocks Route 2: Hydrogenolysis with glycerol from fatty acid production. Route 3:Hydrogenolysis with glycerol from biodiesel production. |
Environmental effect of implementing different feedstock for renewable propylene glycol production. | A transition from petroleum-based economy to renewables-based results in a decrease in the environmental impact between 40% and 60% kg CO2 eq. | Nachtergaele et al., (2019) |
Route 1: Hydrogenolysis with hydrogen from an external source. Route 2: Hydrogenolysis with hydrogen produced locally from glycerol steam reforming. |
Assess the technical and economic impacts of two renewable propylene glycol production routes based on the source of hydrogen. |
|
Jiménez et al., (2020) |
Hydrogenolysis of crude glycerol with external hydrogen | Evaluate the economic viability combined acrolein and propylene glycol production from crude glycerol | Net present value of USD 376,600,000 was obtained from the production process. | Supramono and Ashshiddiq, (2021) |
Route 1: Catalytic hydrogenolysis with external hydrogen Route 2: Catalytic transfer hydrogenolysis |
Assess the energy economic and environmental impacts of the two propylene glycol production pathways. |
|
Sun et al., (2022) |