Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 9;1(12):4644–4658. doi: 10.1039/c9na00543a

Performance comparison of various LIHSCDs.

Hybrid system Energy density (W h kg−1) Maximum power density (W kg−1) Ref.
AC//V2O5/CNT 24–30 850 102
GDY//AC 95–110 1000.4 103
3D graphene//Fe3O4/graphene 60–90 2587 104
PJ-AC//PrG-based Li-HEC 76–162 4500 105
TiO2-(reduced graphene oxide)//AC 8.9–42 8000 106
MnNCN//AC 10–103 8533 107
B-Si/SiO2/C//PSC 89–128 9704 108
CNT-threaded TiO2//CNT-AC 22.3–59.6 13 900 108
3D-MnO/CNS//3D-CNS-1 : 2 83–184 18 000 110
m-Nb2O5-C//AC 15–74 18 510 111
MnO@GNS//HNC 83.25–127 25 000 112
Fe3O4@NC//HNC 95–185 28 000 113