Table 2.

Various centrality measures were used to find key players within each of the 42 collaboratives, resulting in 84 key players per centrality metric. The table shows the number and proportion of key player organizations that responded to sharing various types of resource (table rows) by centrality measure (table columns). Text is coded for the highest number of organizations and proportions for each resource type (1st bold, 2nd italic ).

	Degree		Betweenness		Closeness		Eigenvalue		Fragment
Question Categories	#orgs	prop	#orgs	prop	#orgs	Prop	#orgs	prop	#orgs	prop
1 Funding	9	0.14	16	0.25	12	0.19	1	0.02	16	0.25
2 In Kind Resources	30	0.48	27	0.43	29	0.47	15	0.24	37	0.59
3 Paid Staff	10	0.16	17	0.27	14	0.23	3	0.05	15	0.24
4 Volunteer and Vol. Staff	4	0.06	8	0.13	12	0.19	2	0.03	9	0.14
5 Data Resources	18	0.29	18	0.29	19	0.31	5	0.08	22	0.35
6 Info Feedback	45	0.71	38	0.60	41	0.66	22	0.35	49	0.78
7 Specific Health Expertize	17	0.27	17	0.27	18	0.29	5	0.08	21	0.33
8 Expertize not Health	20	0.32	23	0.37	17	0.27	10	0.16	24	0.38
9 Community Connections	44	0.70	43	0.68	45	0.73	24	0.39	52	0.83
10 Fiscal Management	3	0.05	10	0.16	7	0.11	1	0.02	10	0.16
11 Facilitation Leadership	17	0.27	26	0.41	19	0.31	6	0.10	27	0.43