Table 3.
Pearson correlations (r) between percent change of cognitive scores and resonance frequency power
| Flanker percent change | LSWM percent change | PCPS percent change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| r (p value) | r (p value) | ||
| (A) Across age groups | |||
| Osc+ | n = 79 | n = 79 | n = 79 |
| Resonance frequency oscillatory power | 0.296* (p = 0.008; CI [0.080, 0.485]) | 0.158 (p = 0.164; CI[− 0.065, 0.367]) | 0.167 (p = 0.140; CI[− 0.056, 0.375]) |
| Osc− | n = 72 | n = 72 | n = 72 |
| Resonance frequency oscillatory power | − 0.025 (p = 0.834; CI[− 0.255, 0.208]) | 0.089 (p = 0.456; CI[− 0.145, 0.314]) | 0.011 (p = 0.925; CI[− 0.221, 0.242]) |
| (B) Younger adults | |||
| Osc+ | n = 54 | n = 54 | n = 54 |
| Resonance frequency oscillatory power | 0.361* (p = 0.007; CI [0.103, 0.574]) | − 0.040 (p = 0.776; CI [− 0.304, 0.231]) | − 0.144 (p = 0.300; CI[-0.396, 0.129]) |
| Osc− | n = 44 | n = 44 | n = 44 |
| Resonance frequency oscillatory power | − 0.074 (p = 0.632; CI [− 0.363, 0.228]) | 0.139 (p = 0.368; CI[− 0.165, 0.419]) | 0.145 (p = 0.349; CI[− 0.159, 0.423]) |
| (C) Older adults | |||
| Osc+ | n = 25 | n = 25 | n = 25 |
| Resonance frequency oscillatory power | 0.344 (p = 0.092; CI [− 0.059, 0.651]) | 0.278 (p = 0.178; CI[− 0.131, 0.607]) | 0.356 (p = 0.081; CI [− 0.046, 0.658]) |
| Osc− | n = 28 | n = 28 | n = 28 |
| Resonance frequency oscillatory power | − 0.076 (p = 0.702; CI [− 0.436, 0.306]) | − 0.036 (p = 0.855; CI[− 0.404, 0.341]) | − 0.242 (p = 0.214; CI[− 0.564, 0.144]) |
Correlations are presented for all participants (A) and for each age group (B, C)
*False Discovery Rate (FDR) p < .05