Table 2.
Factors associated with having heard of cannabidiol and factors associated with its use (binary logistic regression, multivariable analysis)
| Variable | Having heard of cannabidiol (N = 1953) |
Cannabidiol use (N = 1948) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aOR [95% CI] | P-value | aOR [95% CI] | P-value | |
| Age (in years) | 0.97 [0.96—0.98] | < 10–3 | 0.98 [0.97—0.99] | < 10–3 |
| Country of birth | ||||
| France | 1 | |||
| Elsewhere | 0.55 [0.35 – 0.87] | 0.010 | ||
| Socio-professional status | ||||
| Farmer/ craftsperson, trader or business manager/ skilled or unskilled worker | 1 | 0.022 | ||
| Executive or higher intellectual profession/ Intermediate profession | 0.60 [0.43—0.85] | 0.004 | ||
| Employee | 0.81 [0.57—1.16] | 0.258 | ||
| Pensioner | 0.72 [0.49—1.07] | 0.108 | ||
| Other, no professional activity | 0.45 [0.28—0.70] | 0.001 | ||
| Tobacco use | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.38 [1.05—1.82] | 0.021 | 2.82 [1.93—4.11] | < 10–3 |
| Cannabis use | ||||
| No | 1 | 1 | ||
| Yes | 2.18 [1.14—4.17] | 0.019 | 7.53 [4.66—12.16] | < 10–3 |
| Self-reported general health status 1 | ||||
| Good | 1 | 0.001 | ||
| Quite good | 1.43 [0.95—2.15] | 0.088 | ||
| Poor | 2.68 [1.60—4.49] | < 10–3 | ||
| ‘Alternative medicines provide better solutions to health problems than conventional medicines’ | ||||
| Disagree | 1 | 0.001 | ||
| Agree | 1.64 [1.03—2.58] | 0.035 | ||
| No opinion | 0.81 [0.50—1.32] | 0.400 | ||
aOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval
1Very good or good vs. quite good vs. poor and very poor