Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 13;8(8):e10134. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10134

Table 2.

Multilevel Poisson Regression Analysis (considering the subject level) to assess the factors that influenced the percentage of BDs of histatin 1 degradation.

Univariate
Adjusted
Variable
% BD (mean ± S.D.)
IRR (CI 95%)
P-value
IRR (CI 95%)
p-value
Groups
G2 -Control (ref) 84.5 ± 16.1
G3 -Gingivitis 81.9 ± 18.4 0.96 (0.88–1.06) 0.495 0.96 (0.88–1.06) 0.495
G1 -CP + Gingivitis 69.5 ± 28.3 0.82 (0.74–0.91) <0.001∗ 0.82 (0.74–0.91) <0.001∗
Sex
Female (ref) 79.3 ± 23.6
Male 77.6 ± 20.9 0.97 (0.88–1.08) 0.664 - -
Age (years)
Continuous - 1.00 (0.95–1.06) 0.759 - -
Salivary flow
Continuous - 1.14 (0.83–1.56) 0.413 - -
OHI–S
Continuous - 0.94 (0.80–1.09) 0.452 - -
Visible biofilm
Continuous - 0.87 (0.71–1.06) 0.188
Calculus
Continuous - 0.96 (0,69–1,34) 0,845 - -
GI
Continuous - 0.84 (0.76–0.92) <0.001∗ - -
Time
Continuous - 0.91 (0.89–0.93) <0.001∗ 0.91 (0.89–0.93) <0.001∗

CP + gingivitis in relation to Gingivitis: IRR = 0.84; CI = 0.75–0.96; p = 0.009∗. CI = 95%; p < 0.05∗

S.D.: Standard deviation; ref: Reference; G1: CP with gingivitis; G2: without CP and without gingivitis; G3: without CP with gingivitis (n = 8/group).