Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 8;38(4):243–254. doi: 10.1159/000519788

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment of included nonrandomized studies using the ROBINS-I tool

Confounding Selection of participants Classification of interventions Deviation from intended intervention Missing data Measurement of outcomes Selection of the reported results Overall risk of bias judgment
NMP studies
 Ravikumar et al. [21] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Selzner et al. [22] Moderate Serious Low Low Low Low Low Serious
 Bral et al. [23] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Liu et al. [26] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
HMP studies
 Guarrera et al. [12] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Dutkowski et al. [13] Moderate Low Low Serious Low Low Low Serious
 Guarrera et al. [14] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Van Rijn et al. [15] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Patrono et al. [16] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Schlegel et al. [17] Moderate Low Low Serious Low Low Low Serious
 Ravaioli et al. [18] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Rayar et al. [19] Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate

NMP, normothermic machine perfusion; HMP, hypothermic machine perfusion.