Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;88(1):53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.05.009

Table 1.

Demographic data and clinic pathologic breakdowns of the 6 patients enrolled in this study.

Case no. Age Sex Subsite Stage Comorbidities Main techniques used in esophagectomy The time fistula occurred Repair time (months) Followup time (month) Result
1 47 Male MTE T3N1M0 None Left thoracotomy, two-field lymphadenectomy, hand-sewn anastomosis, posterior mediastinal route Severe anastomotic site bleeding 8 h postoperatively, fistula in 2nd postoperative day 3 27 Postoperative radiation performed, survive, normal oral intake
2 68 Male MTE T2N0M0 HT, HL Right thoracotomy, three-field lymphadenectomy, mechanic anastomosis, retrosternal route 2nd POD 3 25 Survive, oral intake, tolerate soft diet
3 56 Male MTE T2N0M0 None Right thoracoscopy, three-field lymphadenectomy, mechanic anastomosis, posterior mediastinal route, endoscopic 5th POD 8 53 Survive, normal oral intake
4 51 Female UTE T1N0M0 HL Left thoracotomy, hand-sewn anastomosis, posterior mediastinal route 3rd POD 2 42 Survive with normal oral intake
5 60 Male MTE T2N0M0 HT, DM Right thoracoscopy, two-field lymphadenectomy, mechanic anastomosis, posterior mediastinal route 2nd POD 3 15 Normal oral intake, died in 15 months after operation due to tumor recurrence
6 49 Female MTE T2N0M0 None Left thoracotomy, two-filed lymphadenectomy, hand-sewn anastomosis, posterior mediastinal route 3rd POD 3 34 Survive, normal oral intake

MTE, middle thoracic esophagus; UTE, upper thoracic esophagus; HT, hypertension; HL, hyperlipemia; DM, diabetes mellitus; PO, postoperative day.