Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;87(3):353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.11.006

Table 2.

Quality Assessment of the studies based on directness category.

Study Type of study Sample Patients (with SHL, uni or bilateral) Therapy (IC uni or bilateral) Outcome (evaluation of tinnitus perception after implantation) Follow-up (≥ 6 months) DoEa
Mertens G. et al. 19 PCS 23 (+) (+) (+) (+) H
Dillon M.T. et al. 14 PCS 20 (+) (+) (+) (+) H
van Zon A. et al. 6 RCT 38 (+) (+) (+) (+) H
Punte A.K. et al. 20 PCS 14 (+) (+) (+) (-) M
Quentin Summerfield A. et al. 21 RCT 24 (+) (+) (+) (-) M
Liu Y. et al. 18 RCT 234 (+) (+) (+) (+) H
Távora-Vieira D. et al. 22 PCS 28 (+) (+) (+) (+) H
Ramakers G.G.J. et al. 15 RCT 38 (+) (+) (+) (+) H
Di Nardo W. et al. 3 PCS 30 (+) (-) (+) (+) M
Arts R.A. et al. 16 PCS 10 (+) (+) (+) (-) M
Arts R.A. et al. 17 RCS 10 (+) (+) (+) (-) M

DoE, Directness of evidence; H, High; M, Moderate; PCS, Prospective case series; RCS, Retrospective case series; RCT, Randomized Controlled Trial.

a

Level of directness of evidence: A high directness of evidence was defined as a positive score on all criteria, moderate as a positive score on three out of the four criteria, and a low directness of evidence if they complied with less than three criteria.