Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 23;72(724):e773–e779. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0043

Table 3.

Multilevel regression analysis to identify predictors of UPC scores (n = 347 728 patients contributing to this model)a

Variable Demographic and practice factors

β coefficient 95% CI P-value
Age, years
3–17 Reference
18–39 0.030 0.028 to 0.032 <0.001
40–64 0.055 0.053 to 0.057 <0.001
≥65 0.082 0.080 to 0.084 <0.001

Sex
Male Reference
Female 0.026 0.025 to 0.027 <0.001

Ethnicityb
White Reference
Black −0.010 −0.012 to −0.008 <0.001
South Asian −0.016 −0.018 to −0.014 <0.001
Other −0.004 −0.007 to −0.001 0.01

Internal IMD 2015 quintile
1 (least deprived) Reference
2 −0.005 −0.007 to −0.002 <0.001
3 −0.006 −0.008 to −0.004 <0.001
4 −0.006 −0.008 to −0.004 <0.001
5 (most deprived) −0.009 −0.011 to −0.007 <0.001

Practice list size
<5000 Reference
≥5000 to <10 000 −0.101 −0.141 to −0.062 <0.001
≥10 000 −0.181 −0.219 to −0.142 <0.001

Locality
City & Hackney Reference
Newham 0.031 −0.005 to 0.068 0.09
Tower Hamlets 0.008 −0.032 to 0.048 0.68
a

Multilevel model comprises patients nested within practices. Intraclass correlation (ICC) showing the proportion of variation in UPC scores at practice level = 0.259.

b

Ethnicity not stated/missing is not reported. CI = confidence interval. IMD = Index of Multiple Deprivation. UPC = Usual Provider of Care.