Skip to main content
Journal of Epidemiology logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology
. 2022 Oct 5;32(10):469–475. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20210393

Association of Ginseng Consumption With All-cause and Cause-specific Mortality: Shanghai Women’s Health Study

Pranoti Pradhan 1, Wanqing Wen 1, Hui Cai 1, Yu-Tang Gao 2, Gong Yang 1, Xiao-ou Shu 1, Wei Zheng 1
PMCID: PMC9424189  PMID: 35400709

Abstract

Background

Ginseng, an herbal remedy, has been commonly used in Asian countries to promote longevity and health for over 2,000 years. However, the association of ginseng consumption with all-cause and cause-specific mortality is still unclear. We analyzed the association of total and major cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular disease [CVD], cancer, and other death) with consumption of ginseng (primarily American and white ginseng).

Methods

This study included 56,183 female participants with an average follow-up of 14.7 years in the Shanghai Women’s Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study. Data were assessed via an in-person interview conducted at baseline recruitment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ginseng-mortality associations after adjusting for confounders.

Results

Compared with those who never used ginseng, regular ginseng use was associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87–0.98). This inverse association was seen primarily among those who consumed ginseng for perceived general health benefit (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85–0.96). A significant dose-response association was observed between duration of ginseng use and total mortality (HR 0.85, for using ≥6 years vs never use; P for trend <0.001), CVD mortality (HR 0.83; P for trend = 0.019), and other-cause mortality (HR 0.76; P for trend = 0.001). However, no dose-response association was observed between amount of ginseng consumption and mortality outcomes.

Conclusion

Regular ginseng consumption, particularly over a long duration, was associated with decreased risk of all causes of death, death due to CVD, and death due to certain other diseases.

Key words: ginseng, mortality, epidemiology, cardiovascular diseases, alternative medicine

INTRODUCTION

Over the past decades, there has been an increase in the use of alternative and complementary medical approaches, especially herbal medicines, to help alleviate disease symptoms and improve health.15 Ginseng, which is one of these herbal remedies, has been commonly used by Chinese to promote longevity and health for over 2,000 years.4 Throughout the years, ginseng has also been gaining popularity in other Asian and Western countries. Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer (Asian ginseng), known as white ginseng, and Panax quinquefolius L. (American ginseng) are the two most commonly used ginsengs in Asian and Western countries, respectively.6

Previous studies have shown potential benefits of ginseng on improving immune function and cardiovascular system responses and affecting sex hormone levels.79 Data from in vivo experiments with animal models has also suggested that ginseng and its constitutes, ginsenosides, have anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and anti-diabetic properties.810 In addition, ginseng has been shown to potentially improve metabolism and cognitive development and decrease cell stress.11,12

Epidemiologic studies on the association between ginseng consumption and risk of diseases have been limited. Several studies have evaluated the association of ginseng consumption with risk of cancer13,14 and cardiovascular disease (CVD).1517 Results from these studies, however, have been inconsistent. To our knowledge, only one small cohort study, which included less than 6,300 participants, has investigated the association between ginseng consumption and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.15 The study reported some reduction in mortality risk in association with regular ginseng consumption, but the results were inconsistent by sex. We evaluated the association of ginseng use with total and cause-specific mortality (all-cause death, CVD, cancer, and other death) in a population-based cohort study of 56,183 female participants with nearly 15 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Study population

Data used in this study were from a population-based cohort study, the Shanghai Women’s Health Study (SWHS). The details of this study have been published elsewhere.18 In brief, the SWHS recruited 74,940 women between the ages of 40–70 years old living in urban communities in Shanghai.18 In-person interviews were performed from 1996 to 2000 at the cohort baseline survey to obtain information on demographic characteristics, lifestyle habits, personal and familial disease history, and other known and suspected risk factors for chronic diseases, with an overall response rate of 92.7%.18,19 Anthropometric measurements were obtained at baseline by trained interviewers. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The study was approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions and the work is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant number UM1 CA182910). Information on the use of ginseng (ginseng root) or a ginseng product was obtained through in-person interviews. Participants were asked if they had regularly consumed ginseng (at least five times a year as defined in the questionnaire) within the past 3 years.18 For those participants who reported regularly using ginseng, information was ascertained. This included the type of ginseng used (white or red Asian ginseng, American ginseng, and ginseng products (eg, root extract, powder, tablet, or capsule), the duration (years) of use, the amount (grams/years) of use, and the reason for use.18 All interviewers received a 2-week rigorous training, and only qualified interviewers were certified to conduct surveys. To further improve the quality of survey data, all in-person interviews were tape-recorded, and more than 5% of recorded interviews were evaluated by the study quality control team.

Information on vital status and causes of deaths was obtained through a combination of in-person follow-up surveys and record-linkage with the database of the Shanghai Cancer Registry and the Shanghai Vital Statistic Registry. Five in-person follow-up surveys were conducted from 2000 to 2018, with response rates of 99.76%, 98.69%, 95.03%, 92.50%, and 91.01% for the first to the fifth survey, respectively. These in-person follow-ups, conducted every 2 to 4 years for all living cohort members, were to update exposure data and collect information on health status, diseases diagnosis, and new exposure information. Ascertainment of mortality outcomes is virtually complete via the linkage with registry data because of the extremely low outmigration rate.

Statistical analysis

The primary endpoints for this analysis were all-cause and major cause specific mortality. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Ninth Revision codes were used to classify the causes of death. Deaths with ICD codes 140–208 were classified as cancer, and deaths with ICD codes 390–459 were classified as CVD mortality. We also excluded those who had history of cancer, coronary heart disease, or stroke at baseline; had chronic liver disease or chronic bronchitis; or died within the first 3 years after study enrollment to minimize possible influence of reverse causality in our results. Person-years cumulated for the first 3 years were also excluded in the analysis. Very few cohort members had missing body mass index (BMI; 0.05%), BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 (4.58%), or were previous cigarette smokers (3.76%) or alcohol drinkers (2.99%), so these individuals were also excluded from the current analysis to remove their potential influence to confound the results. After excluding those participants, 56,183 women remained for the current analysis (Figure 1). The average follow-up time for this cohort was 14.7 years.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study population selection from Shanghai Women’s Health Study (SWHS) cohort. The results are not mutually exclusive.

Figure 1.

We compared distributions of selected baseline characteristics of study participants by ginseng consumption status with the t-test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of ginseng consumption with subsequent overall or cause-specific mortalities were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Person-years were counted from 1996 up to December 31, 2016 or censoring on the date of death, whichever came first. Our analyses were primarily focused on white and American ginseng, as the vast majority of ginseng used in the population were these two types. Total amount of ginseng consumption for both white and American ginseng combined was categorized into three groups, which are high (≥750 g per year), medium (375–749.99 g per year), and low use (<375 g per year). The duration of ginseng usage was categorized as short (<3 years), medium (3–5.99 years), and long-term (≥6 years) use. Reasons for consumption of ginseng were categorized as either consumed for perceived general benefit for enhancement of health, for perceived specific health benefit against existing/prevalent illness, or for other reasons.

The Cox models were adjusted for potential confounders determined based on a priori knowledge, which included age at baseline survey, waste-to-hip ratio (WHR), BMI (categorized 18.5–19.9, 20.0–24.9, 25.0–29.9, ≥30.0 kg/m2), education (elementary school or less, middle school, high school graduate, some college or higher); household income (low: <10,000 yuan; middle: 10,000–30,000 yuan; high: >30,000 yuan); marital status (currently married, single/separated/divorced/widowed); menopause status (yes, no); exercise (continuous metabolic equivalent of tasks [MET]s); vitamin consumption (yes, no); calcium consumption (yes, no); diet (categorical quartiles, healthy dietary score); and ever diagnosed with hypertension (yes, no) or diabetes (yes, no).1316,1820 The healthy dietary score was calculated based on 8 food groups: fruit, vegetables (excluding potatoes), dairy, fish and seafood, nuts and legumes, refined grains, red meat, and processed meat.20,21 The methods are described elsewhere, but, in brief, the score was based on energy adjusted and sex-specific quintiles.20,21 The first five food groups were given ascending values (1 to 5) and the last three groups were given descending values (5 to 1).20,21 The healthy dietary score was the sum of those values, and a higher score corresponded with a better diet.20,21 Within these covariates, 8 out of 56,183 individuals had missing data for education (0.01%) and 11 out of 56,183 individuals had missing data for income (0.02%). Since the missing rates were very low, individuals with missing values for descriptive statistics were included in the analysis but were excluded from the multivariate modeling.

Lastly, P values for trend tests were derived from the regression model by treating the ordered ginseng consumption amount or duration as a continuous variable. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA IC (Version 16.0.801; Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA) and R (Version: 1.2.1335, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.22

RESULTS

Selected demographic factors and major risk factors for mortality of the participants at baseline are presented in Table 1. At baseline, 14,270 (25.4%) women reported using ginseng regularly (regular users). In this study population, the all-cause mortality was 8.82 per 1,000 person-years, mortality due to CVD was 3.06 per 1,000 person-years, mortality due to cancer was 3.52 per 1,000 person-years, and mortality due to other causes was 2.24 per 1,000 person-years. Compared to nonusers, regular ginseng users were on average older, more educated, had a higher income, and exercised more regularly. However, regular ginseng users also had higher frequencies of hypertension and diabetes. Furthermore, American ginseng and white ginseng were the two most commonly used types of ginseng, accounting for approximately 97.1% of total ginseng use.

Table 1. Selected baseline characteristics of study participants by ginseng consumption status, Shanghai Women’s Health Study, 1996–2016.

Characteristics Regular ginseng use

No Yesb,c P-value
Number of cohort members 41,913 14,270  
Age, yearsa 50.4 (8.3) 54.1 (9.1) <0.001
Waist-to-hip ratioa 0.808 (0.05) 0.811 (0.05) <0.001
Body mass index, kg/m2 a 24.1 (3.2) 24.0 (3.1) 0.456
Education, %     <0.001
 Never have formal education 7.7 11.8  
 Elementary school or less 8.2 13.0  
 Middle school 42.2 31.4  
 High school graduate 29.3 27.6  
 Some college and higher 12.6 16.1  
Household income, %     <0.001
 Low 15.4 14.2  
 Middle 75.3 73.9  
 High 9.3 11.9  
Currently married, % 90.8 87.4 <0.001
Ever diagnosed with hypertension, % 18.8 24.0 <0.001
Ever diagnosed with diabetes, % 2.9 5.0 <0.001
Ever consumed vitamin supplements, % 5.3 10.6 <0.001
Ever consumed calcium supplements, % 14.8 24.1 <0.001
LTPA daily activity, % 22.7 36.1 <0.001

LTPA, leisure-time physical activity; SD, standard deviation.

aMean (SD).

bMedian (interquartile range [IQR]) for duration of ginseng consumption: 4 (IQR, 2–9 years).

cMedian (IQR) for amount of ginseng consumption: 100 (IQR, 50–150 grams).

Table 2 presents the associations between ginseng use (ever vs never) and mortality outcomes in all participants and by reasons of ginseng use. Ginseng use was found to be significantly associated with decreased risk of all causes of death among all participants after adjustment for covariates (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87–0.98). This association held for cause-specific mortality, although it was not statistically significant for deaths due to CVD and cancers. Stratified analysis by reasons of ginseng use, the association of consumption of ginseng and decreased risk of deaths was more evident among those who consumed ginseng for the perceived general benefit for enhancement of health (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85–0.96 for all causes of deaths, HR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82–0.99 for deaths due to CVD, and HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69–0.90 for deaths due to unspecified causes). Similar results were found when we restricted analyses to American ginseng and white ginseng. No significant association, however, was found among cohort members who consumed ginsengs for perceived specific health benefits against existing diseases, likely due to possible influence of reserve causation (eTable 1). Therefore, all subsequent analyses were performed to evaluate the association of mortality with the use of American ginseng and white ginseng among individuals who consumed ginseng for perceived general benefit for enhancement of health, which was the reason for the majority of participants who consumed ginseng. After this stratification, there were 12,922 women who consumed American ginseng and white ginseng for this reason.

Table 2. HRsa and 95% CIs of mortality associated with ginseng use, Shanghai Women’s Health Study.

Ginseng Consumption Adjusted HR (95% CI)a Adjusted HR (95% CI)a Adjusted HR (95% CI)a Adjusted HR (95% CI)a
among all subjectsb among consumers for general
health benefitsc
among consumers for specific
health benefits against existing
illnessd
among consumers for other
reasonse




Deaths (N) Total Users Deaths (N) Total Users Deaths (N) Total Users Deaths (N) Total Users
All causes
Never 3,427 1.00 3,427 1.00 3,427 1.00 3,427 1.00
Ever 1,681 0.92 (0.87–0.98) 1,533 0.90 (0.85–0.96) 186 1.09 (0.94–1.27) 50 0.85 (0.64–1.12)
 American/White ginseng 1,578 0.92 (0.87–0.98) 1,437 0.90 (0.85–0.96) 138 1.24 (1.03–1.48) 7 0.88 (0.43–1.79)
Cardiovascular diseases
Never 1,049 1.00 1,049 1.00 1,049 1.00 1,049 1.00
Ever 575 0.92 (0.83–1.02) 531 0.91 (0.82–0.99) 54 0.93 (0.70–1.24) 16 0.88 (0.53–1.45)
 American/White ginseng 544 0.93 (0.84–1.04) 504 0.93 (0.83–1.04) 40 1.04 (0.74–1.45) 4 1.96 (0.76–5.06)
Cancer
Never 1,551 1.00 1,551 1.00 1,551 1.00 1,551 1.00
Ever 703 0.96 (0.88–1.05) 657 0.96 (0.87–1.05) 67 1.04 (0.81–1.34) 25 0.98 (0.66–1.46)
 American/White ginseng 655 0.95 (0.87–1.05) 611 0.95 (0.86–1.04) 42 1.03 (0.75–1.41) 2 0.49 (0.12–1.95)
Other disease causes
Never 827 1.00 827 1.00 827 1.00 827 1.00
Ever 403 0.85 (0.75–0.96) 345 0.79 (0.69–0.90) 65 1.31 (1.01–1.69) 9 0.59 (0.32–1.11)
 American/White ginseng 379 0.86 (0.76–0.97) 322 0.79 (0.69–0.90) 56 1.69 (1.27–2.24) 1 0.57 (0.08–4.15)

CI, confidence interval, HR, hazard ratio.

aAdjustment: age, income, marriage status, education, menopause status, comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes), exercise, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, diet, vitamin and calcium supplements.

bOf the 14,270 participants who ever regularly consumed ginseng, 13,830 consumed American/White ginseng.

cOf the 13,308 participants who ever regularly consumed ginseng for general health benefits, 12,922 consumed American/White ginseng.

dOf the 869 participants who ever regularly consumed ginseng specific health benefits against existing illness, 821 consumed American/White ginseng.

eOf the 107 participants who ever regularly consumed ginseng for other reason, 101 consumed American/White ginseng.

In Table 3, we categorized the use of American ginseng and white ginseng to three durations (<3 years, 3–5.99 years, and ≥6 years). There were 538 women with missing data on their duration of American ginseng and white ginseng consumption and thus were excluded from the analysis. We found that the longer use was associated with lower risk when comparing with never users, in a linear dose-response manner, for all causes of death (P for trend <0.001), and death due to CVD (P for trend = 0.019) and other causes of death (P for trend = 0.001). However, no dose-response relation was found between duration of ginseng use and cancer mortality (P for trend = 0.100).

Table 3. HRa and 95% CI of mortality associated with duration of consuming either American or White ginseng among individuals who consumed ginseng for perceived general benefit for enhancement of health, Shanghai Women’s Health Study.

Cause of deaths   Duration of ginseng use, years

Never Use
(N = 41,431)
<3
(N = 3,089)
3–5.99
(N = 3,976)
≥6
(N = 5,319)
P for trend
All causes
Deaths (N) 3,427 318 445 611  
HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.98 (0.87–1.10) 0.90 (0.81–0.99) 0.85 (0.78–0.92) <0.001
Cardiovascular diseases
Deaths (N) 1,049 113 162 208  
HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.07 (0.88–1.30) 0.94 (0.79–1.11) 0.83 (0.71–0.96) 0.019
Cancer
Deaths (N) 1,551 141 178 264  
HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.05 (0.88–1.25) 0.90 (0.77–1.06) 0.91 (0.80–1.04) 0.100
Other causes
Deaths (N) 827 64 105 139  
HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.77 (0.59–0.99) 0.82 (0.67–1.00) 0.76 (0.63–0.91) 0.001

CI, confidence interval, HR, hazard ratio.

aModels adjusted for age, income, marriage status, education, menopause status, comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes), exercise, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, diet, vitamin and calcium supplements.

Participants (N = 538) with missing data on duration of ginseng use were excluded.

Table 4 presents the association of deaths with the amount of American ginseng and white ginseng consumption. A low amount (<375 grams/year) of American ginseng and white ginseng consumption was associated with significantly decreased risk of all causes of death (HR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78–0.94), deaths due to CVD (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69–0.97), and other cause of death (HR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51–0.80) when compared with never users. Although no clear dose-response association was found between the amount of ginseng consumption and mortality outcomes, trend tests for a linear association were statistically significant for all causes of death (P for trend = 0.017) and other causes of death (P for trend = 0.005).

Table 4. HRsa and 95% CIs of mortality associated with amount of consuming either American or White ginseng among individuals who consumed ginseng for perceived general benefit for enhancement of health, Shanghai Women’s Health Study.

Cause of deaths Never Use
(N = 41,431)
Amount of ginseng use, grams/year

<375
(N = 4,270)
375–749.99
(N = 5,095)
≥750
(N = 3,557)
P-trend
All causes
Deaths (N) 3,427 466 603 368 0.017
HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.86 (0.78–0.94) 0.93 (0.85–1.01) 0.92 (0.82–1.03)
Cardiovascular diseases
Deaths (N) 1,049 160 197 147 0.989
HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.82 (0.69–0.97) 0.89 (0.76–1.03) 1.15 (0.96–1.38)
Cancer
Deaths (N) 1,551 216 247 148 0.110
HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.01 (0.88–1.17) 0.95 (0.83–1.09) 0.87 (0.72–1.02)
Other causes
Deaths (N) 827 90 159 73 0.005
HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.64 (0.51–0.80) 0.95 (0.80–1.12) 0.71 (0.55–0.91)

CI, confidence interval, HR, hazard ratio.

aAdjustment: age, income, marriage status, education, menopause status, comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes), exercise, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, diet, vitamin and calcium supplements.

All HRs and 95% CI are calculated compared with never users.

We further analyzed the joint association of the amount and duration of ginseng use for either American or White ginseng with mortality (Table 5). The inverse association of ginseng use was most evident among long-term users (≥3 years) who took a low amount (<375 grams/year), who had lower risk of all causes of deaths (HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73–0.93), death due to CVD (HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64–0.97), and other cause of death (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.77) than never users.

Table 5. The joint associationsa of the amount and duration of consuming either American or White ginseng with mortality among individuals who consumed ginseng for perceived general benefit for enhancement of health, Shanghai Women’s Health Study.

Cause of deaths Amount of ginseng use, grams/year

<375 g
(N = 4,270)
375–749.99 g
(N = 5,095)
≥750 g
(N = 3,557)
P-trend
All causes
<3 years Deaths (N) 160 156 64 0.584
HR (95% CI) 0.91 (0.78–1.07) 1.11 (0.95–1.31) 1.02 (0.79–1.30)
≥3 years Deaths (N) 306 446 304 0.001
HR (95% CI) 0.83 (0.73–0.93) 0.87 (0.79–0.96) 0.90 (0.80–1.01)
Cardiovascular diseases
<3 years Deaths (N) 53 59 22 0.129
HR (95% CI) 0.88 (0.67–1.17) 1.31 (0.99–1.71) 1.21 (0.79–1.85)
≥3 years Deaths (N) 107 138 125 0.400
HR (95% CI) 0.79 (0.64–0.97) 0.78 (0.65–0.93) 1.14 (0.94–1.38)
Cancer
<3 years Deaths (N) 73 65 30 0.388
HR (95% CI) 1.03 (0.82–1.31) 1.11 (0.87–1.43) 1.07 (0.74–1.54)
≥3 years Deaths (N) 143 181 118 0.023
HR (95% CI) 1.01 (0.85–1.19) 0.89 (0.76–1.04) 0.82 (0.68–0.99)
Other causes
<3 years Deaths (N) 34 32 12 0.089
HR (95% CI) 0.76 (0.54–1.07) 0.88 (0.61–1.25) 0.70 (0.38–1.29)
≥3 years Deaths (N) 56 127 61 0.009
HR (95% CI) 0.58 (0.44–0.77) 0.96 (0.80–1.16) 0.71 (0.54–0.93)

CI, confidence interval, HR, hazard ratio.

aAdjustment: age, income, marriage status, education, menopause status, comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes), exercise, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, diet, vitamin and calcium supplements.

All HRs and 95% CI are calculated compared with never users.

Of the participants who regularly consumed American/White ginseng, 3,832 participants consumed it for less than 3 years.

Of the participants who regularly consumed American/White ginseng, 9,957 participants consumed it for 3 or more years.

DISCUSSION

In this large prospective cohort study with a long-term follow-up, we found that ginseng use, particularly long-term ginseng use for improvement of general health, was associated with decreased risk of all causes of deaths, death due to CVD, and other causes of death. Our results suggested that regular ginseng consumption may confer some health benefits in reducing mortality.

Our results are supported, in part, by a previous small study conducted in a Korean population, in which a decrease in all-cause mortality for male ginseng users compared to non-users was observed (HR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81–0.99).15 That study also reported a decreased cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.32–1.14) in female regular ginseng users. Yun et al reported a suggestive dose-response relationship between increased ginseng intake and decreased cancer risk.23 However, our study did not find any significant association between ginseng use and cancer-specific mortality. The reason for the inconsistency about cancer outcomes between our analysis and the previous study results are unclear, and further studies are needed.

There are several lines of evidence to support the inverse association of ginseng use with CVD mortality observed in our study. Ginseng has been shown to improve arterial functions and facilitation of vasorelaxation.24,25 Specifically, Rg3 ginsenoside has been shown to have ACE activity inhibition and anti-inflammatory potential in in vitro experiments.26 In vivo studies also show that ginseng can lead to an improved lipid profile and a decreased risk of atherosclerosis by reducing plasma levels of cholesterol, free fatty acids, and triglycerides.24 A study by Kim also shows that ginseng intake could lead to decreased antithrombotic effects due to its antiplatelet activity, suggesting that consumption may be beneficial for those with elevated risk of CVD.16 These findings support our results, suggesting that ginseng intake could have potential beneficial effects in reducing risk of death due to CVD.

Ginseng may have health benefits beyond the cardiovascular system. Lü et al performed an in vivo study on mice demonstrating that ginseng helped extend lifespan, increased resistance to starvation stress, and also prevented weight gain.8 Ginseng enhanced the organism’s metabolism in favor of increasing lifespan and also portrayed anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and anti-diabetic properties.8 A similar study by Szczuka et al expanded on these results, showing that ginsenosides could improve nervous system activity, cognitive function, and decrease hypertrophy.9 Specifically, the study team reported neuroprotective effects against neuronal damage resulting from ischemic stroke in animals, increased insulin sensitivity and inhibition of adipose tissue formation, and antimicrobial potential against several pathogenic strains of bacteria.9 These results from previous studies support our findings because increased biological activity and health benefits can help decrease all-cause mortality.

In this study, we were able to analyze the association of ginseng use with all causes of death and cause-specific death by the reasons of its use. We found that benefit of ginseng consumption primarily manifested among those who consumed ginseng for perceived general benefit for enhancement of health. However, the survival was not improved among those who consumed ginseng for perceived specific health benefit against existing or prevalent illness, suggesting that the therapeutic effects of ginseng use for particular diseases may be limited. In our study, we found that ginseng users were more likely to have a high income, a better education, and more existing comorbidity conditions, and they exercised more regularly than non-ginseng users. It is possible that high socio-economic status, healthy lifestyles, and poor health among ginseng users may have confounded the association. In our analysis, the associations of mortality with ginseng use held after fully adjusting for socioeconomic status and known lifestyle and disease risk factors for mortality.

Our analysis did not find a significant association between a larger amount of ginseng consumption and all-cause or cause-specific mortality. Previous literature reported that lower doses of ginseng has the same effects as larger doses of ginseng on cognitive function and conditions related to diabetes.27,28 However, these previous studies show that the duration of ginseng consumption may be more important than the amount of ginseng consumption, which is similar to our findings.27,28

Other noticeable strengths of our study include a prospective cohort design with a large sample size, detailed assessments of ginseng use history, and a high participation rate. All of these factors allowed us to perform a detailed analysis of the association of various levels and reasons of ginseng consumption with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. The study also has a high follow-up rate, enhancing the validity of the study findings. Additionally, the study includes a comprehensive assessment of demographic, lifestyle, and major disease risk factors conducted at the baseline survey, so we were able to control for a wide range of potential confounders. However, a major limitation of this study is that ginseng consumption was self-reported, which could introduce potential misclassification errors, particularly regarding the amount of ginseng consumption. These errors should be mostly non-differential due to the prospective design, leading to attenuation of the true association between the exposure and outcomes. To alleviate bias from these errors, we had the participants report ginseng consumption by not only total ginseng but also by individual ginseng type, amount, and the duration over years. Ginsengs are consumed as supplements, not as foods. Therefore, like most other dietary validation studies, we did not include ginsengs and other supplements in our dietary validation study.29 Therefore, we cannot provide any specific data regarding the accuracy of ginseng intake data. However, similar to tea drinking, it should be easier (and thus, more accurate) to measure ginseng consumption than dietary intakes. Using a method similar to the one used to assess ginseng intake, we obtained tea drinking information in this cohort study and showed that tea drinking was associated with a reduced risk of several cancers.29,30 Also, using a similar method, we obtained ginseng intakes from a cohort study of breast cancer survivors and showed that ginseng consumption was associated with an improved quality of life and survival.4 Results from these studies support the validity of ginseng intake data obtained in our study.

To minimize the bias from participants making changes in their ginseng consumption levels due to a disease diagnosis and preventing reverse causation, we excluded participants with less than 3 years of follow-up. Furthermore, although we adjusted for potential confounders, which were also self-reported, residual confounding remains possible, as some potential confounders could not be precisely ascertained. Lastly, the subjects in this study were female residents in Shanghai. Therefore, the results in the current study may not apply to males or other populations.

In conclusion, results from our study, along with support from recent findings, suggest potential health benefits of ginseng consumption in reducing mortality. Our study findings warrant further investigation on the potential health benefit of ginseng consumption.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank all study participants who took part in the study. Also, we would like to thank Rachel Mullen in the Division of Epidemiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, for assistance with preparation and editing of the manuscript. This study is supported, in part, by NIH grant UM1 CA182910.

Funding: This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health [grant number UM1 CA182910].

Statement of author’s contribution to manuscript: PP and WZ designed research; WZ, XS, and YG conducted research; WZ, XS, and HC provided essential reagents; PP and WW analyzed data and performed statistical analysis; PP, WW, and WZ wrote paper; PP and WZ had primary responsibility for the final content; XS, YG, and GY assisted with critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content; and all authors: contributed to the preparation and revision of the manuscript and approved the manuscript submission. All authors of this paper fulfill authorship criteria and have read and approved the final version of the manuscript, and no authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Data sharing plan: Data described in the manuscript, code book, and analytic code will be made available upon request pending [application and approval].

Conflicts of interest: None declared.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

The following is the supplementary data related to this article:

eTable 1. HRsa and 95% CIs of mortality associated with short term and long term duration of ginseng use (years), Shanghai Women’s Health Study, 1996–2016.

je-32-469-s001.pdf (104.7KB, pdf)

REFERENCES

  • 1.Cardiovascular diseases. Accessed September 15, 2020. https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases.
  • 2.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.The top 10 causes of death. Accessed September 15, 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.
  • 4.Cui Y, Shu XO, Gao YT, Cai H, Tao MH, Zheng W. Association of ginseng use with survival and quality of life among breast cancer patients. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(7):645–653. 10.1093/aje/kwj087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bao PP, Lu W, Cui Y, et al. Ginseng and Ganoderma lucidum use after breast cancer diagnosis and quality of life: a report from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39343. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wang CZ, Anderson S, Du W, He TC, Yuan CS. Red ginseng and cancer treatment. Chin J Nat Med. 2016;14(1):7–16. 10.3724/SP.J.1009.2016.00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Park J, Song H, Kim SK, Lee MS, Rhee DK, Lee Y. Effects of ginseng on two main sex steroid hormone receptors: estrogen and androgen receptors. J Ginseng Res. 2017;41(2):215–221. 10.1016/j.jgr.2016.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lü JM, Yao Q, Chen C. Ginseng compounds: an update on their molecular mechanisms and medical applications. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2009;7(3):293–302. 10.2174/157016109788340767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Szczuka D, Nowak A, Zakłos-Szyda M, et al. American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium L.) as a source of bioactive phytochemicals with pro-health properties. Nutrients. 2019;11(5):1041. 10.3390/nu11051041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mancuso C, Santangelo R. Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius: from pharmacology to toxicology. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;107(Pt A):362–372. 10.1016/j.fct.2017.07.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Attele AS, Wu JA, Yuan CS. Ginseng pharmacology: multiple constituents and multiple actions. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;58(11):1685–1693. 10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00212-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kennedy DO, Scholey AB. Ginseng: potential for the enhancement of cognitive performance and mood. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2003;75(3):687–700. 10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00126-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yun TK. Update from Asia. Asian studies on cancer chemoprevention. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;889:157–192. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08734.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Z, Xie C, Huang Y, Lam CWK, Chow MSS. Overcoming chemotherapy resistance with herbal medicines: past, present and future perspectives. Phytochem Rev. 2014;13(1):323–337. 10.1007/s11101-013-9327-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yi SW, Sull JW, Hong JS, Linton JA, Ohrr H. Association between ginseng intake and mortality: Kangwha cohort study. J Altern Complement Med. 2009;15(8):921–928. 10.1089/acm.2008.0296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim JH. Cardiovascular diseases and Panax ginseng: a review on molecular mechanisms and medical applications. J Ginseng Res. 2012;36(1):16–26. 10.5142/jgr.2012.36.1.16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guo J, Gan XT, Haist JV, et al. Ginseng inhibits cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and heart failure via NHE-1 inhibition and attenuation of calcineurin activation. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4(1):79–88. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.110.957969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zheng W, Chow WH, Yang G, et al. The Shanghai Women’s Health Study: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(11):1123–1131. 10.1093/aje/kwi322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Y, Wen W, Gao YT, et al. Level of moderate-intensity leisure-time physical activity and reduced mortality in middle-aged and elderly Chinese. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(1):13–20. 10.1136/jech-2017-209903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yu D, Nguyen SM, Yang Y, et al. Long-term diet quality is associated with gut microbiome diversity and composition among urban Chinese adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(3):684–694. 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu D, Zheng W, Cai H, et al. Long-term diet quality and risk of type 2 diabetes among urban Chinese adults. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(4):723–730. 10.2337/dc17-1626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yu D, Zheng W, Johansson M, et al. Overall and central obesity and risk of lung cancer: a pooled analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(8):831–842. 10.1093/jnci/djx286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yun TK, Choi SY. Non-organ specific cancer prevention of ginseng: a prospective study in Korea. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(3):359–364. 10.1093/ije/27.3.359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shaito A, Thuan DTB, Phu HT, et al. Herbal medicine for cardiovascular diseases: efficacy, mechanisms, and safety. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:422. 10.3389/fphar.2020.00422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kim ND, Kang SY, Kim MJ, Park JH, Schini-Kerth VB. The ginsenoside Rg3 evokes endothelium-independent relaxation in rat aortic rings: role of K+ channels. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;367(1):51–57. 10.1016/S0014-2999(98)00899-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Persson IAL, Dong L, Persson K. Effect of Panax ginseng extract (G115) on angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity and nitric oxide (NO) production. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;105(3):321–325. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.10.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kiefer D, Pantuso T. Panax ginseng. Am Fam Physician. 2003;68(8):1539–1542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Reay JL, Kennedy DO, Scholey AB. Single doses of Panax ginseng (G115) reduce blood glucose levels and improve cognitive performance during sustained mental activity. J Psychopharmacol. 2005;19(4):357–365. 10.1177/0269881105053286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shu XO, Yang G, Jin F, et al. Validity and reproducibility of the food frequency questionnaire used in the Shanghai Women’s Health Study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58(1):17–23. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nechuta S, Shu XO, Li HL, et al. Prospective cohort study of tea consumption and risk of digestive system cancers: results from the Shanghai Women’s Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(5):1056–1063. 10.3945/ajcn.111.031419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

je-32-469-s001.pdf (104.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology are provided here courtesy of Japan Epidemiological Association

RESOURCES