Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 16;19(3):633–649. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00665-z

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and Bayesian t tests between each variable for both waves with their credibility interval

Variables M SD T tests
Bayes factor10
Estimated median effect size 95% Credibility interval
Wave 1 Neuroticism 5.32 1.90 0.358 − 0.079 [− 0.154;− 0.004]
Wave 2 Neuroticism 5.24 1.79
Wave 2 MMSE 28.47 1.82
Wave 1 TMT-A completion time 51.12 20.81 0.366 0.087 [0.002;0.172]
Wave 2 TMT-A completion time 53.12 22.18
Wave 1 TMT-B completion time 102.7 29.7 43,247.593 0.239 [0.149;0.328]
Wave 2 TMT-B completion time 111.3 32.8
Wave 2 Perceived stress 5.88 2.47

M” = means and “SD” = standard deviation. Neuroticism mean scores are based on the sum of the two items of neuroticism for each wave divided by 2. A value of Bayes Factor 10 (BF10) higher than 3 indicates that data are in favor of the alternative hypothesis rather than the null hypothesis. The credibility interval indicates significance of the BF10: when the confidence interval does not contain the value 0 (meaning that both ends of the interval are either larger or smaller than 0), we reject H0 and conclude that the path is significant. Analyses indicate anecdotal evidence for H0 for neuroticism and TMT-A, meaning there was no significant difference between mean scores at W1 and W2. Analyses indicate extreme evidence for H1 for TMT-B, meaning there was a significant difference between mean scores at W1 and W2