Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 17;19(3):651–662. doi: 10.1007/s10433-021-00669-9

Table 2.

Radom intercept logistic regression, odds ratios and 95%-confidence intervals [CI] to receive home care and random intercept ordinary least square regression and 95%-CI of the difference in mean number of home care hours for the Swedish population aged 65 + in 2016

Source Longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labor market studies (LISA), Statistics Sweden (SCB), Inpatient-register and SoL-register, Government Board of Health and Welfare

Variables Logit home care OLS home care hours
OR (95%-CI) Beta (95%-CI)
Age-group
65–69 1 0
70–74 1.70 (1.60–1.80) − 0.38 (− 2.02–1.26)
75–79 4.00 (3.78–4.23) − 1.29 (− 2.73–0.15)
80–84 11.04 (10.4–11.66) − 1.49 (− 3.01–0.03)
85–89 29.51 (27.91–31.20) − 1.32 (− 3.18–0.54)
90 +  72.81 (68.27–77.67) 4.55 (2.39–6.71)
Charlson index
Healthy 1 0
Mild 3.23 (3.07–3.40) 4.59 (3.98–5.20)
Moderate 6.91 (6.50–7.34) 8.48 (7.64–9.32)
Severe 15.01 (14.02 16.08) 13.34 (12.03 14.64)
Sex
Man 1 0
Women 1.42 (1.39–1.45) 2.40 (1.83–2.97)
Household type
Cohabitating 1 0
Living alone 5.72 (5.47–5.99) 2.98 (1.85–4.10)
Family availability
No living children 1 0
Child not in same municipality 0.80 (0.78–0.81) − 2.83 (− 3.67 to 1.98)
Child in same municipality 0.73 (0.72–0.74) − 1.69 (− 2.48 -0.89)
Level of education
Primary 1 0
Secondary 0.92 (0.91–0.93) − 0.68 (− 1.29 to 0.07)
Under-graduate 0.89 (0.87–0.91) − 1.18 (− 2.19 to 0.17)
Graduate level 0.92 (0.90–0.94) 0.04 (− 0.92–1.01)
Income quartile
-25% 1 0
26–50% 0.97 (0.93–1.02) − 0.50 (− 1.24 to 0.23)
51–75% 0.45 (0.42–0.48) 0.10 (− 0.82 to 1.02)
76%- 0.28 (0.26–0.30) 2.41 (0.67–4.14)
Household type * Age-group
Living alone * 70–74 0.85 (0.81–0.90)
Living alone * 75–79 0.69 (0.66–0.73)
Living alone * 80–84 0.55 (0.52–0.58)
Living alone * 85–89 0.47 (0.45–0.49)
Living alone * 90 +  0.45 (0.42–0.47)
Household type * Sex
Living alone * Women 0.76 (0.74–0.78)
Age-group * Income quartile
70–74 * 26–50% 1.01 (0.95–1.08)
70–74 * 51–75% 1.29 (1.20–1.39)
70–74 * 76%- 1.57 (1.43–1.71)
75–79 * 26–50% 0.96 (0.90–1.02)
75–79 * 51–75% 1.44 (1.35–1.55)
75–79 * 76%- 2.10 (1.93–2.29)
80–84 * 26–50% 0.95 (0.89–1.00)
80–84 * 51–75% 1.69 (1.58–1.80)
80–84 * 76%- 2.53 (2.32–2.75)
85–89 * 26–50% 0.94 (0.89–1.00)
85–89 * 51–75% 1.79 (1.67–1.92)
85–89 * 76%- 2.91 (2.67–3.17)
90 + * 26–50% 0.99 (0.93–1.05)
90 + * 51–75% 1.91 (1.77–2.06)
90 + * 76%- 2.99 (2.71–3.30)
Charlson index * Age-group
Mild * 70–74 0.83 (0.78–0.88)
Mild * 75–79 0.73 (0.69–0.77)
Mild * 80–84 0.60 (0.57–0.63)
Mild * 85–89 0.54 (0.51–0.57)
Mild * 90 +  0.50 (0.47–0.53)
Moderate * 70–74 0.80 (0.74–0.86)
Moderate * 75–79 0.60 (0.56–0.65)
Moderate * 80–84 0.44 (0.41–0.47)
Moderate * 85–89 0.37 (0.35–0.40)
Moderate * 90 +  0.31 (0.29–0.34)
Severe * 70–74 0.85 (0.78–0.92)
Severe * 75–79 0.59 (0.54–0.63)
Severe * 80–84 0.38 (0.36–0.41)
Severe * 85–89 0.27 (0.25–0.29)
Severe * 90 +  0.22 (0.20–0.24)
Charlson index * Sex
Mild * Women 1.12 (1.09–1.15)
Moderate * Women 1.18 (1.14–1.22)
Severe * Women 1.14 (1.10–1.19)
cons .008 (.007–.009) 23.38 (22.99 25.77)
Intra class correlation 0.02 0.07
SD (_cons) 1.32 13.34
N 1 840 107 132 442