Skip to main content
. 2000 Jan;182(1):116–129. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.1.116-129.2000

TABLE 6.

Coiled-coil-forming potential in FtsL gram-negative and gram-positive homologues

Organism Predicted coiled coila Avg scoreb (%)
Escherichia coli 60–90 5
Escherichia coli (W81 to Y) 60–90 90c
Yersinia pestis 40–80 5
Yersinia pestis (W81 to Y) 40–80 90c
Buchnera aphidicola 35–70 80
Haemophilus influenzae 40–80 100
Bacillus subtilis 60–100 100
Streptococcus aureus 60–120 95
Streptococcus pneumoniae 40–110 100
Enterococcus faecalis 75–115 100
a

Approximate location of the strongest prediction for coiled coil in FtsL amino acid sequence. 

b

Scores were calculated according to the work of Lupas et al. (18) with the COILS program on the ISREC web server (http://www.isrec.isb-sib.ch/software /COILS_form.html). Window length, 21; matrix, MTIDK weighted. For E. coli and Y. pestis FtsL, the value reported is the average obtained with all four matrices used. 

c

Coiled-coil propensity prediction: consequence of the replacement of W81 (1) by Y (2) in E. coli FtsL and of W66 (3) by Y (4) in Y. pestis FtsL.