Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 17;12(5):656–661. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.08.016

Table 3.

showed the detailed analysis of the 2 animal studies.

S no Author/Year Total number of animals Total number of implants placed Age of animal Study summary Location of implant Implant dimension Inference
1. Subaie et al., 2016 24 Sprague Dawley Rat 24 implants 10 weeks In 24 rats implants were placed in left tibia and defect was created in the right tibia. After surgery rat were on omeprazole (5 mg/kg) and others on saline. After euthanasia rat, percentage of new bone formation in the defect was assessed using microcomputed tomography and peri-implant bone mass or tissue volume and percentage of bone implant contact was observed by histomorphometry. Tibia left 1.5mm × 2.0 mm Rats on PPIs shoe larger cortical bone defects. The systematic administration of these drugs impaired the bone healing.
12 treated with Omeprazole
12 with saline
2. Tekin et al., 2021 24 Sprague Dawley Rat 48 implants 2.5–3 months In 24 sprague Dawley rats after surgical placement of Ti implant into the metaphyseal part of left and right tibia and randomly divided into three groups n = 8 omeprazole 5 mg/kg and n = 8 10 mg/kg and n = 8 control group. Total 48 implants were placed. After experiment animals from each group was scarified and study completed with 7 rats in each group. Blood samples were collected for biochecimal analysis and implant and surrounding tissue were used for biomechanical reserve torque analysis. Left and right Tibia 4mm × 2.5 mm PPIs have no biomechanical or biomchecimal effect on dental implant osseointegration.
N = 8 controls 32 in PPIs treated
N = 8 on 5 mg/kg of omeprazole 16 in non treared
N = 8 on 10 mg/kg of omprazole