Skip to main content
. 2018 May 9;22(3):186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.04.003

Table 1.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics.

Characteristic SOF + DCV ± RBV (n = 176) SOF + SMV ± RBV (n = 79) Total (n = 255)
Male, n (%) 103 (58.5%) 38 (48.1%)a 141 (55.2%)a
Mean (SD) age, years 58.1 (±10.3) 57.1 (±12.4) 57.8 (±10.8)
HCV genotype
 1 total 102 (57.9%) 79 (100.0%) 198 (66.8%)
 1 unspecified 26 (14.7%) 8 (10.1%) 34 (13.3%)
 1a 36 (20.4%) 39 (49.3%) 75 (29.4%)
 1b 40 (22.7%) 31 (39.2%) 71 (27.8%)
 3 72 (41.0%) 72 (28.2%)
 Missing data 2 (1.1%) 1 (1.2%) 3 (1.1%)
Viral load  800,000 IU mL−1, n (%) 89 (50.5%) 37 (46.8%) 126 (49.4%)
 Missing data 9 (5.1%) 2 (2.5%) 11 (4.3%)
Treatment experience, n (%) 92 (52.2%) 35 (44.3%) 127 (49.8%)
 Missing data 1 (0.5%) 3 (3.7%) 4 (1.5%)
Fibrosis stage, n (%)
 F0–F3 38 (21.5%) 32 (40.5%) 70 (27.4%)b
 F4 (cirrhotic) 77 (43.7%) 22 (27.8%) 99 (38.8%)b
 Missing data 61 (34.6%) 25 (31.6%) 86 (33.7%)
Liver transplantation 5 (2.8%) 3 (3.7%) 8 (3.1%)
Treatment duration, n (%)
 12 weeks 129 (73.0%)a 77 (97.4%) 206 (80.7%)a,b
 24 weeks 44 (25.0%) 2 (2.5%) 46 (18.0%)b
Addition of RBV, n (%) 56 (31.8%) 8 (10.1%) 64 (25.0%)
Co-infection
 Hepatitis B virus (HBV) 4 (2.2%) 1 (1.2%) 5 (1.9%)
 Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 10 (5.6%) 10 (13.9%)
a

1 patient missing data.

b

p < 0.05 (comparison between number of patients in each group that received sofosbuvir with daclatasvir versus sofosbuvir with simeprevir). Abbreviations: DAA, direct acting antivirals; DCV, daclatasvir; IFN, interferon; HCV, hepatitis C virus; LED, ledipasvir; RBV, ribavirin; SD, standard deviation; SMV, simeprevir; SOF, sofosbuvir.