Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Aug 30;36(1):87–92. doi: 10.1007/s42535-022-00458-4

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) profiling of aqueous methanol fraction of Plagiochasma appendiculatum Lehm. & Lindenb. and Sphagnum fimbriatum Wilson for probable antiviral potential

Supriya Joshi 1, Swati Singh 1, Rimjhim Sharma 1, Sharad Vats 1, Afroz Alam 1,
PMCID: PMC9426370  PMID: 36061344

Abstract

The bryophytes consist of liverworts, mosses, and hornworts, among which the liverworts are quite different in having cellular oil bodies and contain numerous terpenoids, acetogenins, quinones, phenylpropanoids, flavonoids, etc. These metabolites exhibit interesting biological activity such as allergenic response, insecticide, cytotoxic, neurotrophic, antimicrobial, and anti-HIV actions, etc. Though several bioactive compounds have been isolated in many liverworts, yet most of the liverworts have been unexplored till date regarding their phytochemistry. The ability of liverworts to generate a wide range of important phytochemicals makes them a hoard of bioactive compounds. In the past, a few species of bryophytes have been evaluated against a few viruses and interesting results were obtained that showed their role as an immunity enhancer against viral infection. The phytoconstituents found in liverworts and mosses can be useful to increase human immunity against a variety of viruses, including SARS-CoV-2. Keeping this in view, one of the most developed and robust metabolomics technologies, Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC–MS) was used to estimate the various phytoconstituents found in a commonly growing thalloid liverwort, Plagiochasma appendiculatum, and moss Sphagnum fimbriatum. The obtained profiles were appraised for their bioactive potential and probable role as antiviral agents.

Keywords: Antiviral, Bryophytes, GC–MS analysis, Liverworts, Moss, Secondary metabolites

Introduction

After angiosperms, bryophytes constitute the second largest diversity of green terrestrial plants (Asakawa 2007; Tedela et al. 2014). Bryophytes have three classes, viz., liverworts (Marchantiophyta), hornworts (Anthocerotophyta), and mosses (Bryophyta). Among these, liverworts are quite different from the other two classes in having oil bodies and a variety of bioactive secondary metabolites. Many liverworts have been utilized in medications to prevent and cure a variety of ailments all over the globe (Bodade et al. 2008; Sabovljevic et al. 2016). Bryophytes are thought to be a great repository of new natural products or secondary chemicals. Hundreds of novel phytochemicals have been isolated from bryophytes, especially liverworts, and determined chemically (Basile et al. 1999; Asakawa et al. 2013; Alam 2021). Some of these bioactive compounds have been found to have antimicrobial properties due to the presence of bi-flavonoids (Lopez-Saez 1996). Likewise, the existence of several phenolic compounds such as caffeic, gallic, 3–4 hydrobenzoic, vanillic, chlorogenic, p-coumaric, and salicylic acid was discovered using reverse phase high-pressure liquid chromatography considering the moss, Sphagnum magellanicum (Montenegro et al. 2009). Bryophytes are the chosen wildly growing plants to treat skin diseases and liver disorders (Friederich et al. 1999; Saroya 2011; Gokbulut et al. 2012). Though mosses, despite having a wider diversity of species, have been examined less thoroughly for therapeutic reasons than liverworts due to the natural absence of oil bodies, few of the species showed good amounts of terpenoids, bibenzyls, flavonoids, fatty acids, and acetophenols in them (Asakawa et al. 2013; Asakawa and Ludwiczuk 2018).

A healthy resilient mechanism of human beings continuously defends the body from the occurrence of innumerable microorganisms, but when this system deteriorates, it results in many long-lasting diseases like SARS-CoV-2 which cannot be treated perfectly through conventional medicines. Many recent reports specify a close interface between SARS-CoV-2 and the immune response of an individual. This activated resistant reply due to SARS-CoV-2 in an infected individual can be affected in two stages; the preliminary incubation or non-severe and the following final severe stage (Shi et al. 2020). If the resistance of the infected individual is robust, then the advancement from the initial stage into the second stage will be delayed and help the system in the early elimination of the virus.

Hence, the confrontation-boosting approaches are very significant in providing immunity at the early stages of viral attacks. This depends upon the total health of the individual and its endogenous immune response to check the initial action of the virus (Shi et al. 2020). If the immunity of the infected individual is feeble, then the virus will flourish and replicate effortlessly, which results in immense harm to the body (Chen et al. 2020). It has been seen that SARS-CoV-2 affects respiration, kidney functions, liver metabolism, gastrointestinal tract, cardiac, and central nervous system (Huang et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020). Thus, many deaths have happened due to multiple organ failures. Based on the information available about SARS-CoV-19, one thing is clear that the degree of immunity is the primary defense deciding death and life for someone afflicted with the virus (Fan et al. 2022). There has been no known occurrence of viruses infecting bryophytes, thus it’s probable that their phytochemicals provide defense against viruses. Hillhouse (2003) showed that a bioflavonoid found in bryophytes can inhibit a wide range of viruses. Considering the resilient nature of bryophytes against viruses, the present research work has been done to compare the phytoconstituents profiles of the Uttarakhand populations of a liverwort, Plagiochasma appendiculatum Lehm. & Lindenb, and a moss Sphagnum fimbriatum Wilson and to envisage the possibility of these taxa to be evaluated for antiviral potential.

Material and method

Collection of plant and identification

The selected bryophytes were collected in December 2020, from Nainital, Uttarakhand (India) at an altitude of ca. 2084 msl. All samples were collected from their natural habitats in the afternoon to get optimum level of phytoconstituents. The random sampling approach was used during the collection within a stretch of 1 km. The identification was done based on available herbarium specimens and literature available at Bryotechnology Laboratory, Banasthali Vidyapith (Rajasthan), India. The taxonomic data of the reference specimens Plagiochasma appendiculatum Lehm. & Lindenb. (BURI-1138/2000) and Sphagnum fimbriatum Wilson (BURI-1145/2000) was deposited in the Banasthali University Rajasthan India Herbarium (BURI).

Preparation of plant material

The thalli were first precisely cleaned with tap water to remove soil particles and other plant debris then used deionized water for the final wash. Washed thalli were then transferred to liquid nitrogen (− 80 °C) and taken to the research laboratory, where the frozen thalli remained kept at the temperature of − 80 °C till further study. Before extract preparation, the thalli of both the species were air-dried at room temperature and pulverized into powder for extraction. The powder (5 g) was macerated in 80% methanol and hexane and allowed to stand for 48 h in an orbital shaker at 50 °C. The extract was filtered and stored at 4 °C until needed (Vats and Alam, 2013).

Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC–MS) analysis

For the GC–MS analysis, the technique described by Abu Bakar et al. (2015) was applied. The plant sample's crude extract was examined using a Thermo Scientific Triple Quadruple GC–MS (trace 1300, Tsq 8000 triple quadruple MS). The column temperature was initially set to 50 °C for 4 min, and then for 20 min, it was raised to 320 °C at a rate of 7 °C/min. The injector temperature was set to 280 °C (split mode, 20:1, injection volume = 0.1 μL). With a runtime of 60 min, the flow rate of the helium carrier gas was set at 1 mL/min. To acquire mass spectra in the range of m/z 40–700, electron ionization at a potential of 70 eV was utilized. The sample’s chromatogram was determined by comparing the mass spectra to library data and the GC retention time to established standards.

Results and discussion

The GC–MS chromatograms for the methanolic extracts of gametophytes of selected liverwort and moss taxa were done (Figs. 1, 2). The chemical profiles have been attained for both the species and the percentage of each chemical compound was estimated from the relative peak area of each component in the chromatogram. The results show that the liverwort (P. appendiculatum) has 26 phytoconstituents (Table 1), while moss (S. fimbriatum) has only 13 diverse phytoconstituents (Table 2). Interestingly, the Caryophyllene and derivatives of phenol are present in both plants (Tables 1, 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

GC–MS chromatogram of aqueous methanol fraction of Plagiochasma appendiculatum

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

GC–MS chromatogram of aqueous methanol fraction of Sphagnum fimbriatum

Table 1.

Bioactive compounds found in aqueous methanol fraction of Plagiochasma appendiculatum

S. no. RT (min) Peak area (%) Name of the compound Molecular formula
1 10.67 15.74 2,6-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3TMS derivative C16H30O4Si3
2 14.66 23.09 Caryophyllene C15H24
3 14.91 2.99

2H-Pyran, 2-(7-heptadecynyloxy)tetrahydro-Aromandendrene

à-acorenol

á-Longipinene

C22H40O2

C15H24

C15H26O

C15H24

4 15.66 5.96

2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol

Phenol, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-

Phenol, 2,6-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-

C14H22O

C14H22O

C14H22O

5 17.91 3.05

Octadecane, 3-ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl)-

Ethanol, 2-(octadecyloxy)-

Tetrapentacontane, 1,54-dibromo-

C26H54

C20H42O2

C54H108Br2

6 19.66 4.35

Phthalic acid, butyl undecyl ester

Phthalic acid, isobutyl octadecyl ester

1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl octyl ester

Phthalic acid, butyl tetradecyl ester

Phthalic acid, 2-cyclohexylethyl isobutyl ester

C23H36O4

C30H50O4

C20H30O4

C26H42O4

C20H28O4

7 19.80 2.86

tert-Hexadecanethiol

2-Hexadecanol

2-Nonadecanone 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine

Oleic acid, 3-(octadecyloxy)propyl Ester

Octadecane, 3-ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl)-

C16H34S

C16H34O

C25H42N4O4

C39H76O3

C26H54

8 20.14 4.01

Octadecane, 3-ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl)-

Heptacosane

Tetradecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl-

Tetrapentacontane, 1,54-dibromo-

C26H54

C27H56

C17H36

C54H108Br2

Table 2.

Bioactive compounds found in aqueous methanol fraction of Sphagnum fimbriatum

S. no. RT (min) Peak area (%) Name of the compound Molecular formula
1 6.84 2.43 Acetic acid methyl ester C3H6O2
2 11.16 20.50 Caryophyllene C15H24
3 14.20 5.19 3,7,11,15- Tetra methyl- 2- hexadecen-1-ol C20H40O
4 16.90 10.15 Phytol C20H20O
5 19.44 18.28 Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester C17H34O2
6 21.49 6.08

Heptadecanoic acid 16- methyl- methyl ester

Heptadecanoic acid 10- methyl- methyl ester

Methyl stearate

Hexacosane

C19H38O2

C19H38O2

C19H38O2

C26H54

7 23.43 18.37

Propanoic acid

Phenol 2,4- bis (1,1-di methyl ethyl)- phosphate

C3H6O2

C42H63O3P

8 26.16 4.72 Oleic acid, eicosyl ester C38H74O2
9 27.54 5.80 Dasycarpidan 1-methanol, acetate(ester) C20H26N2O2

In many previous studies, the chemical constituents identified in these plants have been found responsible for various medicinal activities. For instance, Caryophyllene has biological activities, viz., antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anesthetic, anti-carcinogenic, anti-microbial, anti-tumor, analgesic, antibacterial, cytotoxicity, and anti-fungal activities (Selvaraju et al. 2021). The compound Phytol is reported to have antiviral, antimicrobial, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory properties (Subin et al. 2021). Hexacosane, Octadecane, Heptacosane essential oil showed a significant antiviral effect against Coxsackie virus B4 (Bouazzi et al. 2018). The methyl ester of hexadecanoic acid has antifungal and antibacterial properties (Mehdi et al. 2021). Oleic acid has a moderate antiviral effect on Parainfluenza virus type-3 (Sener et al. 2007). Recent investigations have proved that tert-Hexadecanethiol has antioxidant activity (Qanash et al. 2022). 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol, was shown to have a protective effect against Ab1-24 by decreasing neuronal cell damage (Choi et al. 2013). Aromandendrene could be considered a novel natural molecule for the possible development of appropriate SARS-CoV-2 drug candidates (Muhammad et al. 2020).

The Phthalic acid ester derivatives showed antiviral activity against dengue virus, human parainfluenza virus and chikungunya (Uddin et al. 2013). Tetrapentacontane, 1,54-dibromo- can treat chronic illnesses (Bensaad et al. 2022).

Though bryophytes are cosmopolitan in distribution, they are lesser explored for their phytochemistry compared to angiosperms. This reluctance was mainly due to their small size, low biomass and understandable difficulties in their collection and identification, hence, very few bryophytes have been evaluated for their phytochemistry till date. The achieved information through their GC–MS profiling exhibit that a range of vital phytochemicals is present in studied plants. These phytoconstituents are well known for their antioxidant, antimicrobial, cytotoxicity, antiviral activities, etc. Among the reported phytoconstituents, many of them have been validated to have antiviral activity against (Russo et al. 2020). This shows that the naturally present phytoconstituents in these plants have great potential to boost the immunity of human beings against a range of viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

On comparison between the selected liverwort and moss taxa, it is evident the liverwort (P. appendiculatum) is richer in terms of phytochemistry than the moss (S. fimbriatum). The phytoconstituents are largely different between them except the Caryophyllene and a few derivatives of phenol that are common in both. This indicates that liverworts have more applicability in herbal remedies of the future. Nevertheless, the phytochemical profiles of both these bryophytes are quite rich, hence, they can provide useful bioactivities, viz., antimicrobial, antitumor, cytotoxic, cardioprotective, allergy triggering, etc., and these bryophytes also have antiviral potential based on earlier reports however further studies are required in this direction.

Conclusion

The GC − MS analysis indicates that both the bryophytes have useful phytoconstituents with vital bioactivities, including antiviral potential. Though the reported phytoconstituents haven’t been estimated against SARS-CoV-2 yet, in the future there is a possibility that these might be useful in various medication strategies against the viruses. Until now, only 5% of the total bryophytes have been chemically investigated and the huge diversity of this group is still unexplored for medicinal practicality including antiviral properties.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor Ina Aditya Shastri, Vice-Chancellor, Banasthali Vidyapith for his encouragement and support.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Abu Bakar MF, Abdul Karim F, Suleiman M, Isha A, Rahmat A (2015) Phytochemical constituents, antioxidant and antiproliferative properties of a liverwort, Lepidozia borneensis Stephani from Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. https://eurekamag.com/research/058/556/058556079.php. Retrieved 24 June 2022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Alam A. Potential of bryophytes in prevention and medication of COVID-19. Ann Phytomed. 2021;10:S121–S129. doi: 10.21276/ap.covid19.2021.10.1.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asakawa Y. Biologically active compounds from bryophytes. Pure Appl Chem. 2007;79(4):557–580. doi: 10.1351/pac200779040557. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asakawa Y, Ludwiczuk A. Chemical constituents of bryophytes: structures and biological activity. J Nat Prod. 2018;81:641–660. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b01046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asakawa Y, Ludwiczuk A, Hashimoto T. Cytotoxic and antiviral compounds from bryophytes and inedible fungi. J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2013;7(2):73–85. doi: 10.26444/jpccr/71442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Basile A, Giordano S, Lopez-Saez JA, Castaldo-Cobianchini R. Antibacterial activity of pure flavonoids isolated from mosses. Phytochemistry. 1999;52:1479–1482. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(99)00286-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bensaad MS, Dassamiour S, Hambaba L, Kahoul MA, Sami R, Al Masoudi LM, Al-Mushhin AA, Benajiba N. Chemical profile by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of ethyl acetate and N-butanol extracts of Centaurea tougourensis Boiss. & Reut. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy. 2022;16(1):140–149. doi: 10.1166/jbmb.2022.2158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bodade RG, Borkar PS, Saiful MA, Khobragade CN. In vitro screening of bryophytes for antimicrobial activity. J Med Plant Res. 2008;7:23–28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bouazzi S, Jmii H, El Mokni R, Faidi K, Falconieri D, Piras A, Jaidane H, Porcedda S, Hammami S. Cytotoxic and antiviral activities of the essential oils from Tunisian Fern, Osmunda regalis. S Afr J Bot. 2018;118:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.06.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, Qiu Y, Wang J, Liu Y, Wei Y, Yu T. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Choi SJ, Kim JK, Kim HK, Harris K, Kim CJ, Park GG, Park CS, Shin DH. 2, 4-Di-tert-butylphenol from sweet potato protects against oxidative stress in PC12 cells and mice. J Med Food. 2013;16(11):977–983. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2012.2739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fan C, Wu Y, Rui X, Yang Y, Ling C, Liu S, Liu S, Wang Y. Animal models for COVID-19: advances, gaps, and perspectives. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):1–24. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01087-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Friederich S, Maier UH, Deus-Neumann B. Biosynthesis of cyclic bis (bibenzyls) in Marchantia polymorpha. Phytochemistry. 1999;50:589–598. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00557-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gokbulut A, Satilmis B, Batcioglu K, Cetin B, Sarer E. Antioxidant activity and luteolin content of Marchantia polymorpha L. Turk J Biol. 2012;36:381–385. doi: 10.3923/jbs.2016.77.85. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hillhouse BJ (2003) Screening of bi flavonoid compounds and British Columbian bryophytes for antiviral activity against potato virus X. MS.C. Faculty of Graduate Studies, British Columbia University
  16. Huang Y, Yang C, Xu XF, Xu W, Liu SW. Structural and functional properties of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: potential antivirus drug development for COVID-19. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41(9):1141–1149. doi: 10.1038/s41401-020-0485-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu Y, Ning Z, Chen Y, Guo M, Liu Y, Gali NK, Sun L, Duan Y, Cai J, Westerdahl D, Liu X. Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals. Nature. 2020;582(7813):557–560. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2271-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lopez-Saez JA. Biflavonoid differentiation in six Bartramia species (Bartramiaceae) Plant Syst Evol. 1996;203:83–89. doi: 10.1007/BF00985238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mehdi AH, Al-Alawi AHM, Thabet AZA, Alarabi FY, Omar GMN, Pradhan V. Analysis of bioactive Mehdi chemical compounds of leaves extracts from Tamarindus indica using FTIR and GC-MS spectroscopy. Asian J Res Biochem. 2021;8(1):22–34. doi: 10.9734/ajrb/2021/v8i130171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Montenegro G, Portaluppi MC, Salas FA, Diaz MF. Biological properties of Chilean native moss Sphagnum magellanicum. Biol Res. 2009;42(2):233–237. doi: 10.4067/S0716-97602009000200012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Muhammad IA, Muangchoo K, Muhammad A, Ajingi YUS, Muhammad IY, Umar ID, Muhammad AB. A computational study to identify potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) from Eucalyptus active compounds. Computation. 2020;8(3):79. doi: 10.3390/computation8030079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Qanash H, Yahya R, Bakri MM, Bazaid AS, Qanash S, Shater AF, TM A, Anticancer, antioxidant, antiviral and antimicrobial activities of Kei Apple (Dovyalis caffra) fruit. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09993-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Russo M, Moccia S, Spagnuolo C, Tedesco I, Russo GL. Roles of flavonoids against coronavirus infection. Chem Biol Interact. 2020;1(328):109211. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sabovljevic MS, Sabovljevic AD, Ikram NKK, Peramuna A, Bae H, Simonsen HT. Bryophytes—an emerging source for herbal remedies and chemical production. Plant Genet Res. 2016 doi: 10.1017/S1479262116000320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saroya AS. Herbalism, phytochemistry, and ethnopharmacology. Punjab: Science Publishers; 2011. pp. 286–293. [Google Scholar]
  26. Selvaraju R, Sakuntala P, Jaleeli KA. GC–MS and FTIR analysis of chemical compounds in Ocimum gratissimum plant. Biophysics. 2021;66(3):401–408. doi: 10.1134/s0006350921030167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sener B, Orhan I, Ozcelik B, Kartal M, Aslan S, Ozbilen G. Antimicrobial and antiviral activities of two seed oil samples of Cucurbita pepo L. and their fatty acid analysis. Nat Prod Commun. 2007;2(4):395–398. doi: 10.1177/1934578X0700200409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Shi J, Wen Z, Zhong G, Yang H, Wang C, Huang B, Liu R, He X, Shuai L, Sun Z, Zhao Y, Liu P, Liang L, Cui P, Wang J, Zhang X, Guan Y, Tan W, Wu G, Chen H, Bu Z. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS-coronavirus 2. Science. 2020;368(6494):1016–1020. doi: 10.1126/science.abb7015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Subin K, Jose PA, Tom B, Nair B, Manju CN. GC–MS analysis of a fragrant epiphyllous liverwort Leptolejeunea balansae from Western Ghats, India. Res J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2021;13(3):115–118. doi: 10.52711/0975-4385.2021.00019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tedela PO, Adebiyi AO, Aremu A. In vitro antibacterial activity of two mosses: calymperes erosum C. Mull and Bryum coronatum Schwaegr from South-Western Nigeria. J Biol Life Sci. 2014;5:77–84. doi: 10.5296/jbls.v5i2.5730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Uddin SJ, Bettadapura J, Guillon P, Darren Grice I, Mahalingam S, Tiralongo E. In-vitro antiviral activity of a novel phthalic acid ester derivative isolated from the bangladeshi mangrove fern Acrostichum aureum. J Antivir Antiretrovir. 2013;5(6):139–144. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vats S, Alam A. Antioxidant activity of Barbula javanica Doz. et Molk.: a relatively unexplored bryophyte. Elixir Appl Bot. 2013;65:20103–20104. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Vegetos (Bareilly, India) are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES