Table 3.
Surveillance adequacy per province during 2015–2020
| Province | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Cape | 8.49 | 4.26 | 4.72 | 8.31 | 7.73 | 2.0 |
| Free State | 5.07 | 2.34 | 5.27 | 3.22 | 6.82 | 2.3 |
| Gauteng | 7.81 | 7.85 | 11.77 | 5.25 | 6.08 | 2.0 |
| KwaZulu-Natal | 3.78 | 2.36 | 12.15 | 8.85 | 4.79 | 1.4 |
| Limpopo | 3.68 | 4.60 | 6.61 | 2.54 | 2.54 | 1.0 |
| Mpumalanga | 8.12 | 5.94 | 14.09 | 6.76 | 7.21 | 3.4 |
| North West | 8.34 | 4.77 | 9.60 | 4.75 | 85.53 | 2.8 |
| Northern Cape | 26.06 | 11.50 | 27.76 | 13.14 | 2.83 | 3.9 |
| Western Cape | 7.94 | 3.72 | 13.21 | 7.31 | 10.07 | 2.9 |
| South Africa | 7 | 4.9 | 10.7 | 6.4 | 7.7 | 2.1 |
Non-measles febrile rash surveillance per 100,000 population in each province. Blocks shaded in grey indicate rates less than two, which are lower than the WHO recommended minimum febrile rash case target