Study characteristics |
Methods |
Study design
Study duration and follow‐up
Study type
|
Participants |
General information
Country: Italy
Setting: single centre
Inclusion criteria: ≥ 18 years having a mini‐invasive urological diagnostic procedure; negative urine examination and negative urine culture
Exclusion criteria: history of recent haematuria (within 3 months); presence of indwelling catheter or nephrostomy or suprapubic catheter or ureteral stent; recent urological, gynaecological or pelvic surgery (within 3 months); neoplastic disease; evidence or suspicious of fistula; diagnosis of interstitial cystitis; pathological findings at physical examination (e.g. digital rectal exploration suspicious for prostate cancer or suggestive for prostatitis)
Baseline characteristics
Number (randomised/analysed): treatment group (40/37); control group (40/38)
Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group (65.4 ± 1.09); control group (65.4 ± 1.03)
Sex (M/F): treatment group (18/19); control group (21/17)
Definition of UTI:positive urine culture
Relevant health status: diabetes (11%); menopausal status for females (29%); hypertension/heart disease (9%); dysthyroidism (4%); natural childbirth (9%); urological surgery (5%); urogynaecological surgery (10%); other co‐morbidities (8%)
Differences between groups at baseline: "The results obtained from the anamnestic assessments between the two groups did not show significant difference in relation to the age, sex, body mass index, menopausal status, co‐morbidities and pharmacotherapy (p‐value > 0.05). The population enrolled in the study was stratified according to the age, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), menopausal status, different birthing modalities, hypertension/heart diseases, diabetes, dysthyroidism, gynaecological and urological surgery or other pathologies, called “Other” (such as osteoporosis, dyslipidaemia, depressive illness, etc.) as indicated in Table 2."
|
Interventions |
Treatment group
Control group
Co‐interventions or additional treatments
Follow‐up details
|
Outcomes |
Outcomes reported at 15 days from treatment start
|
Notes |
At 10 days post urodynamic test, a second laboratory assessment based on urine examination and urine culture was performed in all patients
Trial registration: not reported
A priori protocol publication: not reported
Conflicts of interest: not reported
Funding declared: not reported
|
Risk of bias |
Bias |
Authors' judgement |
Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) |
Low risk |
Quote: "a randomized procedure was used for the random allocation of the enrolled patients into two groups of 40 in equal proportions to ensure a uniform allocation ratio (1:1)" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) |
Unclear risk |
Comment: no information provided regarding the concealment of allocation to groups within the abstract |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Comment: open‐label study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes |
High risk |
Comment: open‐label study |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes |
Low risk |
Comment: all participants were accounted for from start to end of study; attrition 6.25% |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) |
Unclear risk |
Trial registration: not reported
A priori published protocol: not reported |
Other bias |
Unclear risk |
Funding: not reported
Conflicts of interest: not reported |