Study | Reason for exclusion |
---|---|
Domenici 2016 | Study design: intervention started as a single arm phase 1 with all participants receiving treatment. Unclear what the phase 2 baseline starting point is for participants. Results for phase 2 not reported separately or clearly |
Genovese 2018 | Interventions are not comparable. Arm 1 and 2 are same doses of D‐mannose and therefore cannot be compared. To compare arms 2 and 3 against arm 1 is unreliable as the additional combination herbal mixes are complex and too dissimilar to ascertain what would be causing a therapeutic effect |
NCT03497598 | Study terminated 2 September 2020: not enough patients |
NCT03996057 | D‐mannose with or without methenamine for the UTI prevention |
Radulescu 2020 | Two phase trial and data could not be analysed for separate phases for individual doses and regimen |
Salinas‐Casado 2018 | Interventions: arms are comparing PAC and PAC amongst other supplements |
PAC: proanthocyanidin; UTI: urinary tract infection