Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;12:14759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18162-3

Figure 6.

Figure 6

EEG results for the 1 + 3 Syntax sentences with the prosodic contour misaligned with their syntactic structure (thin red lines) plotted against the data from the same 1 + 3 Syntax sentences in the Implicit Prosody condition (ImplP, dotted grey lines): both Overt Prosody (OvP, left column) and Instructed Prosody (InstrP, right column) conditions. The top row (a,b) represents the spectrum of sound intensity envelopes of the spoken sentence materials, the bottom row depicts EEG power in listeners (c,d). The lines in the spectrum plots reflect group averages, with the shaded area depicting standard errors of the mean. Scalp maps show the scalp distribution of the difference between EEG peaks (calculated as distance from the peak value to surrounding noise) for OvP minus ImplP in (c) and for InstrP minus ImplP in (d) (separately for sentence and ½ sentence frequencies). Prominent significant effects are marked with vertical bars: when a prosodic W24 contour not aligning with the 1 + 3 syntactic structure was overtly or covertly applied to the sentences, EEG responses were diminished compared to the ImplP condition.