Table 3.
Type of cancer | Isolation method | Injection procedure | Main results | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|
Breast cancer | RosetteSep and FACS (PI- CD45-EpCAM + ) |
-Dilution in Matrigel - Injection in femoral medullar cavity |
- Drug sensitivity not evaluated - Specific CTC MIC signature: EpCAM+CD44 + MET + CD47 + - decreased progression-free survival of patients with CD44 + , CD47 + and MET + CTCs |
[36] |
Breast cancer | Density gradient centrifugation: Histopaque® |
- Dilution in Matrigel - Subcutaneous injection |
- Drug sensitivity not evaluated - CDX model was representative of the primary tumour features: ER- PR- pan-CK + aECAD+ - identification of MELK as a prognostic marker of TNBC - WNT pathway upregulation as a potential therapeutic target in TNBC |
[37] |
Breast cancer | Multiparametric FACS (CD45-/CD34-/CD105-/CD90- CD73-) | - Intracardiac injection in aseptic conditions |
- Distinct transcriptomic signatures between CTCs from primary tumour site in patients and the corresponding model - Survival analyses of transcriptome signature - Identification of 597 genes related to liver metastasis in TNBC |
[20] |
Small cell lung cancer |
Ficoll-Paque density gradient and CD45 RosetteSep negative selection |
- Dilution in Matrigel - Subcutaneous injection |
- CDXs represent clinical SCLC - Drug sensitivity was evaluated and CDX mimicked the donor’s response to chemotherapy - CDX tumours reflect CTC genomic profile |
[39] |
Small cell lung cancer |
Ficoll-Paque density gradient and CD45 RosetteSep negative Selection CTC-iChip |
- Dilution in Matrigel - Subcutaneous injection |
- Drug sensitivity evaluated - Correlation of MYC signatures with drug resistance by transcriptomic analysis - CDX mirrors the patient’s cancer progression |
[40, 93] |
Non-small cell lung cancer |
Ficoll-Paque density gradient and CD45 RosetteSep negative selection |
- Dilution in Matrigel - Subcutaneous injection |
- Importance of mesenchymal CTCs with tumorigenic capacity - Absence of CTC-EpCAM(+) is not a limitation for metastasis formation |
[41] |
Prostate cancer |
DLA/R Ficoll-Paque density gradient and CD45 RosetteSep negative selection |
- Dilution in Matrigel - Subcutaneous injection |
- Same genome characteristics in CTC, patient tumour, and CDX - Tumorigenic CTCs with acquired CRPC-NE features - Genomic alternations in CDX models |
[43] |
Melanoma |
Ficoll-Paque density gradient and CD45 RosetteSep negative selection |
- Dilution in Matrigel - Subcutaneous injection |
- Drug sensitivity and patients’ response to treatment were evaluated - Concordance in SNV profiles - CTCs have similar tropism as the patient’s tumours |
[44] |
FACS fluorescent-activated cell sorting, CDX CTC-derived xenograft, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, SNV single-nucleotide variant, NE neuroendocrine, MIC metastasis-initiator cells.
This table summarises the different attempts to establish CTC-derived xenografts.