Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 3;127(5):957–967. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01852-0

Table 1.

Patients’ characteristics of BRAF-BeCool population based on tumour sidedness.

Right sided N = 179 Left sided and rectum N = 116
Triplet+/−bev N = 72 n (%) Doublet+/−bev N = 107 n (%) p Triplet+/−bev N = 52 n (%) Doublet+/−bev N = 64 n (%) p
Age (years) 0.002 0.23
 Median 59 64 59 61
 Range (min–max) 27–74 28–74 34–74 24–75
Sex 0.84 0.80
 Male 30 (42%) 43 (40%) 28 (54%) 36 (56%)
 Female 42 (58%) 64 (60%) 24 (46%) 28 (44%)
ECOG-PS 0.032 0.18
 0 60 (83%) 74 (69%) 40 (77%) 42 (66%)
 1–2 12 (17%) 33 (31%) 12 (23%) 22 (34%)
Microsatellite status 0.32 0.0085
 pMMR/MSS 48 (81%) 45 (74%) 43 (100%) 24 (83%)
 dMMR/MSI-H 11 (19%) 16 (26%) 0 (0%) 5 (17%)
 NA 13 46 9 35
Resected primary tumour 0.69 0.71
 Yes 57 (79%) 82 (77%) 35 (67%) 41 (64%)
 No 15 (21%) 25 (23%) 17 (33%) 23 (36%)
Liver only disease 0.093 0.49
 Yes 22 (31%) 21 (20%) 16 (31%) 16 (25%)
 No 50 (69%) 86 (80%) 36 (69%) 48 (75%)
Number of metastatic sites 0.58 0.94
 1 38 (53%) 52 (49%) 24 (46%) 30 (47%)
 >1 34 (47%) 55 (51%) 28 (54%) 34 (53%)
R0/R1 resection of metastases 0.20 0.33
 Yes 17 (24%) 17 (16%) 7 (13%) 13 (20%)
 No 55 (76%) 90 (84%) 45 (87%) 51 (80%)
Time to metastases 0.41 0.20
 Synchronous 68 (94%) 96 (90%) 47 (90%) 52 (81%)
 Metachronous 4 (6%) 11 (10%) 5 (10%) 12 (19%)
Semplified risk  score 0.30 0.68
 High 12 (17%) 25 (24%) 9 (17%) 15 (24%)
 Intermediate 23 (32%) 37 (36%) 19 (37%) 20 (31%)
 Low 37 (51%) 42 (40%) 24 (46%) 29 (45%)
 NA 3
Bevacizumab-based treatment <0.001 0.0078
 Yes 70 (97%) 72 (67%) 48 (92%) 46 (72%)
 No 2 (3%) 35 (33%) 4 (8%) 18 (28%)

Bold values indicate statistical significance p < 0.05.

Simplified score as described by Loupakis et al. [12].

N number, ECOG-PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, NA not available, pMMR proficient mismatched repair, MSS microsatellite stable, dMMR deficient mismatched repair, MSI-H microsatellite instability high.