Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2022 Jul 14;260:119476. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119476

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Effects of temporal spacing on estimating FC. (A) Events (red dots) are more temporally spaced than consecutive points, shown here for MSC02 session 6. (B) Histograms of distance between sampled points using consecutive, random, or cofluctuation-based sampling, aggregated over all subjects and sessions. (C) Randomly sampled points are as similar to static session FC as are events; both match static session FC much better than consecutive or low cofluctuation points. (D) These relationships hold over a range of bin sizes. These results suggest that temporal spacing is an important factor in estimating FC well.