ABSTRACT
The dynamics of Lassa virus (LASV) infections in rodent reservoirs and their endemic human caseloads remain poorly understood. During the endemic period, human infections are believed to be associated with the seasonal migration of Mastomys natalensis, thought to be the primary reservoir that triggers multiple spillovers of LASV to humans. It has become imperative to improve LASV diagnosis in rodents while updating their prevalence in two regions of Lassa fever endemicity in Nigeria. Rodents (total, 942) were trapped in Ondo (531) and Ebonyi (411) states between October 2018 and April 2020 for detection of LASV using various tissues. Overall, the LASV prevalence was 53.6%. The outbreak area sampled in Ondo had three and two times higher capture success and LASV prevalence, respectively, than Ebonyi State. This correlated with the higher number of annual cases of Lassa fever (LF) in Ondo State versus Ebonyi State. All rodent genera (Mastomys, Rattus, Crocidura, Mus, and Tatera) captured in both states showed slightly variable LASV positivity, with Rattus spp. being the most predominantly infected (77.3%) rodents in Ondo State versus Mastomys spp. (41.6%) in Ebonyi State. The tissues with the highest LASV positivity were the kidneys, spleen, and testes. The finding of a relatively high LASV prevalence in all of the rodent genera captured highlights the complex interspecies transmission dynamics of LASV infections in the reservoirs and their potential association with increased environmental contact, as well as the risk of zoonotic spillover in these communities, which have the highest prevalence of Lassa fever in Nigeria.
IMPORTANCE Our findings show the highest LASV positivity in small rodents ever recorded and the first direct detection of LASV in Tatera spp. Our findings also indicate the abundance of LASV-infected small rodents in houses, with probable interspecies transmission through vertical and horizontal coitus routes. Consequently, we suggest that the abundance of different reservoir species for LASV may fuel the epizootic outbreaks of LF in affected human communities. The high prevalence of LASV with the diversity of affected rodents has direct implications for our understanding of the transmission risk, mitigation, and ultimately, the prevention of LF in humans. Optimal tissues for LASV detection in rodents are also presented.
KEYWORDS: Nigeria, Lassa fever, Lassa virus, small rodents, infected tissues, Lassa diagnosis
INTRODUCTION
Lassa fever (LF), caused by the arenavirus Lassa virus (LASV), is a zoonotic hemorrhagic disease which, since its first discovery in 1969, has been found to be endemic to the Western region of Africa, particularly Nigeria (1, 2), Guinea (3), Sierra Leone (3), Liberia (4), and Mali (5). The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) cumulative national LF situation update from January to 15 August 2021 reported 354 confirmed cases with 73 fatalities (case fatality rate [CFR], 20.6%) (6). During the 2018 outbreak of LASV in Nigeria, genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the outbreak was sustained by an increased transmission from rodent reservoirs with relatively few nosocomial transmissions (2). As first reported by Monath and colleagues (7), Lassa mammarenavirus is primarily transmitted to humans from the African multimammate mouse (Mastomys natalensis), the natural host reservoir. Since then, LASV has also been found in other rodent species, such as Mastomys erythroleucus, Hylomyscus pamfi, Rattus rattus, and Mus musculus (1, 8, 9). It remains unknown if each of these species separately maintains LASV over generations through horizontal or vertical transmission cycles, or as a consequence of interspecies transmission due to territorial overlap and mixing, or if some of these species naturally maintain cycles of LASV infection independently over generations.
Numerous studies have reported the prevalence of LASV by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) between 11.3% and 50% in a few rodent species from a number of countries in West Africa using blood (1, 3, 8, 10), single tissue (5, 10, 11), or pooled tissue (12) samples. A seroprevalence of 11% was also reported with the detection of LASV-specific antigen (using blood and spleen homogenates) by Demby et al. (13). In Sierra Leone, however, Monath et al. (7) reported a LASV prevalence of 50% in M. natalensis using tissue culture from a pool of tissues (heart, muscle, lung, kidney, spleen, salivary gland, intestine, and Peyer’s patches). Leski et al. (11) reported a LASV prevalence of 19.16% by RT-PCR using spleen tissue only, while Safronetz et al. (5) reported a 19.4% LASV prevalence by serology and RT-PCR from blood and liver samples from M. natalensis in Mali. In Benue, Plateau, and North-Eastern states in Nigeria, Wulff et al. (14) reported a 3.3% prevalence of LASV in M. natalensis, R. rattus, and Mus minutoides by virus isolation and complement fixation using blood, urine/bladder, and pooled organs (liver, lung, kidney, and spleen). In southern Nigeria, a LASV prevalence of 4.8% was reported in Mastomys erythroleucus, 41.6% in Hylomyscus pamfi (1), and 1.6% in R. rattus, M. musculus, and M. natalensis (8) by RT-PCR of blood samples. However, in the wake of increasing outbreaks of human LF cases in Nigeria, there seemed to be a disparity between the number of rodent infections and the human LF case rates in affected communities. These differences in findings pointed to a need for standardized rodent sampling techniques, for further detailed understanding of the true prevalence and infection dynamics of LASV in animal reservoirs. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the relationship between human LF cases and LASV carriage by small rodent populations in two major LF hot spots in Nigeria. To accomplish this, we undertook a comprehensive LASV prevalence survey in different small rodents in two major regions of endemicity in Nigeria. Through this survey and analysis of different types of samples, we identified the optimal tissues for standardizing LASV detection in small rodents. Furthermore, we identified a high incidence of LASV and a broad spectrum of different rodent species infected with LASV in different outbreak settings.
RESULTS
Small rodent capture success.
(i) Overview of capture rates in Ondo and Ebonyi States. From 2018 to 2020, over 942 small rodents were trapped (from 262 homes and 4 local fields) and sampled from two southern states where LF is endemic in Nigeria. In Ebonyi State, 531 rodents were trapped between October 2018 and February 2020, and in Ondo State, 411 were collected between August and October 2019. The capture rate in Ondo State was higher (18.6%) than that in Ebonyi State (5.8%) (Fig. 1), although this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). A total of four small rodent genera were identified (Mastomys [54%], Rattus [39.7%], Crocidura [5.8%], and Mus [0.5%]) in Ondo State, while five small rodent genera (Mastomys [51.6%], Crocidura [26.4%], Rattus [18.8%], Mus [0.6%], and Tatera [0.2%]) were identified in Ebonyi State. Mastomys spp. had the highest capture rates in both Ondo (9.3%) and Ebonyi (3%) states (Table 1). The second most prevalent species was Rattus spp. in Ondo State, while in Ebonyi State, it was Crocidura spp. (Table 1). Thirteen other small rodents captured in Ebonyi State were unidentified.
TABLE 1.
Rodent species | Capture rate (%) for: |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Owo LGA communities |
Ebonyi State LGAs |
|||||||||
Ijebu-Owo | Isuada | Iselu | Ehin-Ogbe | Total | Izzi | Abakalikia | Ezza North | Afikpo North | Total | |
Mastomys spp. | 0.3 | 6.9 | 8 | 10.9 | 9.3 | 1 | 7.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 3 |
Crocidura spp. | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 |
Rattus spp. | 0.6 | 6.3 | 6.4 | 3.9 | 6.8 | 0 | 3.2 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 1.1 |
Mus spp. | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 |
Tatera spp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 |
Unidentified | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.04 | 0.1 |
Total | 2.9 | 14 | 14.8 | 15.6 | 2.2 | 15.4 | 1.1 | 1 |
Abakaliki is a combination of two local government areas (Ebonyi and Abakaliki).
(ii) Capture rates in local government areas. In Ondo State, small rodents were trapped from only one local government area (LGA) (Owo) comprising several communities. The capture success was the same as presented for Ondo State above. However, in Ebonyi State, rodents were captured from four LGA (Izzi, Abakaliki, Ezza North, and Afikpo North), with Abakaliki having the highest capture success (15.4%) (Fig. 1).
Of the four communities in Owo Local Government Area, Ondo State, Ehin-Ogbe had the highest rodent capture rate (15.6%), followed by Iselu (14.8%) (Table 1). Mastomys spp. were the most frequently trapped species in most communities, except at Ijebu-Owo, where Crocidura spp. (1.9%) were most prevalent (Table 1). In Ebonyi State, traps were set in one community in each local government region. The capture success was highest in the community of Agbaja in Abakaliki LGA (15.4%) (Table 1).
(iii) Capture rates in rural and urban areas. All communities where rodents were trapped in Ondo State were urban, hence the high capture rate of 18.6%. However, in Ebonyi State, the capture rate in the rural area (Izzi) was 6.8%, while in the urban areas (Abakaliki, Ezza North, and Afikpo North local government areas), the capture rate was 6%.
(iv) Capture rates in homes and fields. In Ondo State, a rodent capture rate of 17% was recorded in homes, while the rate in fields was 0.1%. In Ebonyi State, rodent capture rates of 5.8% and 0.03% were recorded in homes and fields, respectively. In Ondo State, all rodent species identified were trapped in homes (Table 2). The most frequently trapped species in homes were Mastomys spp. (9.2%), Rattus spp. (6.8%), and Crocidura spp. (1%), and the least frequent was Mus spp. (0.08%) (Table 2). However, Mastomys spp. and Crocidura spp. were the only species trapped in fields (Table 2). In Ebonyi State, in addition to Crocidura spp., Mus spp. and Tatera spp. were only trapped in fields/on farms (Table 2). In homes in Ebonyi State, Mastomys spp. (3%), Crocidura spp. (1.5%), and Rattus spp. (1.1%) were the only identified species trapped (Table 2).
TABLE 2.
Rodent species | Capture rate (%) in: |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Ondo State |
Ebonyi State |
|||
Homes | Fields | Homes | Fields | |
Mastomys spp. | 9.2 | 0.04 | 3 | 0 |
Crocidura spp. | 1 | 0.08 | 1.5 | 0.02 |
Rattus spp. | 6.8 | 0 | 1.1 | 0 |
Mus spp. | 0.08 | 0 | 0 | 0.03 |
Tatera spp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 |
Unidentified | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 |
Total | 17 | 0.1 | 5.8 | 0.03 |
Prevalence of LASV infection among small rodents.
(i) Overview of prevalence in Ebonyi and Ondo States. The prevalence of LASV in small rodents within the sampling period was calculated as such: the total number of LASV-positive rodents divided by the total number of rodents tested within the designated community/site. Of all 942 rodents captured from both states, 505 (53.6%) were positive for LASV in at least one of the tissues tested. In Ondo State, the LASV prevalence among small rodents was twice as high (74.5%) as in Ebonyi State (37.5%). Interestingly, although the LASV prevalence rate differed significantly, PCR evidence of infection could be found in the different varieties of rodents captured. In Ondo State, the LASV prevalence varied among the rodents captured, with Rattus spp. being the most frequently infected (77.3%). In contrast, in Ebonyi State, the LASV prevalence was lower and moderately variable, with Mastomys spp. showing the highest LASV positivity (41.6%) (Fig. 2). Of the 13 unidentified small rodents captured in Ebonyi, 4 (30.8%) were LASV positive.
There was no significant difference in LASV positivity between male and female rodents (P = 0.252).
(ii) Prevalence in local government areas and their communities. In Ondo State, the LASV prevalence was 74.5% in Owo, the only local government area (LGA) sampled. Iselu was the community in the Owo LGA with the highest LASV prevalence (84.2%) in rodents (Table 3). Other communities showed various species with high LASV infection rates (Table 3). For instance, Rattus spp. were the rodents with the highest LASV infection rates in the communities of Ijebu-Owo (100%) and Ehin-Ogbe (79.2%), while in Isuada, Crocidura spp. (90.9%) had the highest LASV infection rates (Table 3). There was a significant difference in capture success rates and LASV prevalence in small rodents across the communities in Ondo State (P < 0.05). In Ebonyi State, however, Izzi Local Government Area had the highest LASV prevalence (48.3%) in small rodents, with Crocidura spp. being the most LASV-infected (75%) rodent (Table 3). Although Tatera spp. and Mus spp. had a prevalence of 100%, very few were also captured (Table 3). Within Ebonyi State, a significant difference in the number of rodents trapped and LASV infected across the communities was also recorded (P < 0.05).
TABLE 3.
Rodent species | LASV prevalence (%) in: |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ondo State |
Ebonyi State |
|||||||||
Owo |
Izzi |
Abakalikia | Ezza North |
Afikpo North |
Total | |||||
Ijebu-Owo | Isuada | Iselu | Ehin-Ogbe | Total | Onu-Enyim | Agbaja | Oriuzor | Afikpo | ||
Mastomys spp. | 0 | 67.3 | 87.8 | 71.6 | 72.1 | 30.8 | 43.7 | 15.4 | 41.2 | 41.6 |
Crocidura spp. | 66.6 | 90.9 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 75 | 30.5 | 0 | 25 | 30.7 |
Rattus spp. | 100 | 75 | 81.8 | 79.2 | 77.3 | 0 | 34.4 | 0 | 100 | 34 |
Mus spp. | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Tatera spp. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Unidentified | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 30.8 |
Total | 66.7 | 72.2 | 84.2 | 72.9 | 48.3 | 37.9 | 9.1 | 43.5 |
Abakaliki is a combination of two local government areas (Ebonyi and Abakaliki).
(iii) Prevalence in rural and urban areas. In Ondo State, the LASV prevalence was 74.5% in urban areas. In Ebonyi State, 48.3% of rodents captured from rural areas were LASV positive, as against 51.7% in urban areas. Comparison of the LASV prevalence in urban areas between Ondo and Ebonyi states showed no statistically significant difference (P = 0.13).
(iv) Prevalence in homes and fields. In Ondo State, the LASV prevalence was twice as high in homes as in fields (74.8% versus 33.3%), while in Ebonyi State, the LASV prevalence was slightly higher in fields than in homes (40% versus 37.4%). However, there was no significant difference in LASV prevalence between homes and fields for both states (P = 1.00 in Ondo and P = 0.46 in Ebonyi).
The correlation between capture success rates and LASV prevalence in Ondo State was moderately positive (r = 0.4), with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.44). However, in Ebonyi State, a moderately negative correlation (r = −0.5) exists between the capture success rate and LASV prevalence, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.28).
(v) LASV positivity rate in small rodent tissues. Analysis of different tissues by PCR showed various degrees of LASV positivity for all tissues tested for both sites. In Ondo and Ebonyi states, the organs with the highest LASV positivity were the spleen, kidneys, testes, and embryos (Table 4), with the kidneys and spleen being the most significantly (P < 0.01) LASV-infected organs compared to other tissues, irrespective of the sex of the animal. Hence, they were subsequently chosen for LASV diagnosis. Therefore, we classified a rodent as LASV positive when at least one of the tissues tested positive. Plasma was the least (14.9% in Owo and 5.7% in Ebonyi State) positive tissue (Table 4).
TABLE 4.
Location | Organ | No. of rodents tested | No. of rodents positive | Proportion | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ondo | Kidney | 408 | 220 | 0.539 | 53.9 |
Spleen | 406 | 226 | 0.556 | 55.7 | |
Liver | 95 | 37 | 0.389 | 39 | |
Intestine | 96 | 34 | 0.354 | 35 | |
Lungs | 96 | 35 | 0.365 | 36.5 | |
Embryo | 24 | 10 | 0.417 | 41.7 | |
Testes | 83 | 43 | 0.518 | 51.8 | |
Brain | 34 | 6 | 0.176 | 17.7 | |
Bone marrow | 27 | 5 | 0.185 | 18.5 | |
Plasma | 121 | 18 | 0.149 | 14.9 | |
Ebonyi | Kidney | 508 | 123 | 0.242 | 24.2 |
Spleen | 465 | 98 | 0.211 | 21.1 | |
Liver | 92 | 14 | 0.15 | 15.2 | |
Intestine | 92 | 11 | 0.119 | 12 | |
Lungs | 103 | 13 | 0.126 | 12.6 | |
Embryo | 45 | 13 | 0.289 | 28.9 | |
Testes | 101 | 34 | 0.336 | 33.7 | |
Brain | 71 | 14 | 0.197 | 19.7 | |
Bone marrow | 32 | 6 | 0.187 | 18.8 | |
Plasma | 53 | 3 | 0.057 | 5.7 |
Comparing the frequency of LASV positivity in each tissue type across three species (Mastomys spp., Crocidura spp., and Rattus spp.), we observed that only the spleen had significantly high LASV tropism (Table 5). The spleen of Crocidura spp. showed the highest LASV tropism, significantly higher than that in Mastomys and Rattus species (Table 5).
TABLE 5.
Organ | % positivity in: |
P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mastomys spp. | Crocidura spp. | Rattus spp. | ||
Kidney | 34.3 | 29.4 | 35.6 | 0.0815 |
Spleen | 35.2 | 6.3 | 35.6 | 0.0433 |
Liver | 37.4 | 17.6 | 31.1 | 0.8829 |
Intestine | 31.5 | 11.8 | 31.1 | 0.8546 |
Lung | 31.5 | 11.8 | 24.4 | 0.8423 |
(vi) Prevalence by year. The overall LASV infection rate in small rodents was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in Ondo than in Ebonyi State in 2019 (Table 6). In Ebonyi, the LASV prevalence rates in small rodents were 46.4%, 33.9%, and 43.5% in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively.
TABLE 6.
Species | LASV prevalence (%) in: |
P value | |
---|---|---|---|
Ebonyi | Ondo | ||
Mastomys spp. | 41.3 | 72.1 | 0.0001 |
Crocidura spp. | 28.2 | 75 | 0.0001 |
Rattus spp. | 26 | 77.3 | 0.0001 |
Mus spp. | 0 | 100 | |
Tatera spp. | 0 | 0 | |
Unidentified | 20 | 0 |
DISCUSSION
This study reveals the high infection rate of LASV in small rodents from Ondo and Ebonyi states, where LF is endemic in Nigeria. Sublineages IIa and IIb have been shown to circulate in Ondo and Ebonyi states, respectively (2). Although there was a spectrum of LASV-positive rodents captured, there was a positive correlation between the capture success and LASV prevalence among small rodents in Ondo State. Importantly, this study identified the greatest diversity and frequency of infected rodent species in areas of the highest human LF caseloads. This finding suggests not only that higher rodent LASV carriage is a greater risk for human cases but that the dynamics of interspecies transmission among different species of rodents (such as Rattus spp.) carry additional risk factors, especially given that these species are highly invasive and cohabit human households, carrying the virus with them. Furthermore, the complexity of intraspecies transmissions in rodents may greatly increase not only the risk of human spillover and disease burden but also the duration of LASV epidemics in affected urban areas. This may be an important underlying factor influencing the fact that Owo, Ondo State, has consistently had the highest human LF case rate in Nigeria in recent years. Ebonyi State showed a negative correlation between the capture success and LASV prevalence in rodents, suggesting that despite the significant rodent population, there were fewer LASV-infected animals and therefore a lower risk of human transmission and infection. This finding translates into the relatively lower rate of LF cases in Ebonyi than in Ondo State over the years (6, 15).
The PCR-positive rodent frequency rate was three times higher in Ondo State than in Ebonyi State, and this correlates with the human LF case rate observed in Ondo State, which was three times higher than in Ebonyi State between 2018 and 2020 (15). Our findings may show a relationship between the prevalence of a highly LASV-positive rodent population and a high LF case rate in humans.
The overall prevalence of LASV in small rodents reported in this study is higher than that previously reported (1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 16). Other studies conducted in Nigeria have revealed the overall LASV prevalence in rodents to be between 1.6% (8) and 4.76% (1). In other West African countries, studies have also shown overall prevalences of LASV in small rodents between 1.2% and 23.3% (Guinea) (5, 12) and 19.4% and 24% (Mali) (5, 16). The high prevalence of LASV in rodents captured in this study may be due to the comprehensive survey of rodent tissues (in addition to whole blood), contrary to surveys that used only whole blood (1, 8, 9). The use of whole-blood samples from animals for detection of LASV may result in missing the presence of the virus in some animals, as acute-phase viremia is transient in blood, while LASV persists in specific tissues (17). A similar phenomenon has been reported for Ebola (18, 19). Previous findings by Fichet-Calvet et al. (20) indicate that Mastomys spp. clear viremia within a period (between 1 and 3 months) significantly shorter than their life span. Thus, the true picture of LASV prevalence in small mammals can only be accurately ascertained by testing both tissues and whole blood. Optimal tissue samples are suggested for standardizing LASV confirmation in rodents but may differ slightly across regions, species, and possibly sublineages. Due to the gap in knowledge about the stage of infection at the time of sampling and the optimal rodent tissues to target, diagnosis may be challenging. Hence, choosing one tissue for diagnosis of LASV in rodents may return a false-negative result. Therefore, for a more accurate LASV diagnosis in small rodents by PCR, we recommend that at least three tissues (kidney, spleen, and testis [in males], liver [in females], or embryo [in gravid does]) be tested, as a single tissue will not be sufficient for a reasonable conclusion.
More than half of the small rodents captured in Ebonyi and Ondo states were Mastomys spp., as reported by Bonwitt et al. (21) in Sierra Leone. The various genera of small rodents morphologically identified in the two localities sampled in Nigeria were Mastomys, Crocidura, Rattus, Mus, and Tatera. Other studies conducted in Nigeria (1, 8, 9) described similar findings. Although Mastomys spp. was the reservoir host with the best capture success in both chosen regions, it was not the species with the highest rate of LASV infection in Owo, Ondo State. In Owo (more urban setting), the black Rattus spp. rodents had the most LASV infections, followed by Crocidura spp. This new finding expands our understanding of the complexity of animal reservoirs and the interspecies dynamics of LASV in different settings. The molecular confirmation of the small rodent species described in this study is reported in detail elsewhere (A. N. Happi et al., submitted for publication). Early reports had described Mastomys spp. as the primary species harboring LASV (3, 10, 13, 22). Other species, such as Mastomys erythroleucus, Hylomyscus pamfi, and more recently, Rattus spp. (8), have also been found to be reservoirs of LASV (1, 10, 15).
In this study, Rattus sp. rodents were the most predominantly infected (77.3%) in Owo, Ondo State. This has a direct implication for the possible transmission of LASV between Rattus spp. and humans, as they are the most abundant in homes in Nigeria (8). Rattus is a better climber than most small rodents and is found mostly in roofs/ceilings, actively infesting human houses and thereby creating greater opportunities for infection of humans through various routes.
Although there has been a previous report of LASV-specific antibody (IgG) in Crocidura spp. captured in Nigeria (9), to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of PCR detection of LASV in Tatera and Crocidura spp. In addition, all small rodent genera herewith identified showed positivity to LASV, suggesting that the virus circulates among small rodents sharing the same environment or ecosystem, with potential maintenance of the virus through frequent interspecies transmission.
The higher trapping success in homes than in fields in both Ondo and Ebonyi states suggests a higher exposure risk to LASV from small rodents in household settings. The abundance of small rodents in homes increases zoonotic transmission risks to humans through aerosol inhalation of virus-laden dust particles, ingestion of food contaminated with rodents’ excreta (urine and feces), and handling or in some cases consumption of infected rodents (3, 21, 23). In addition, some villagers in our study sites reported rats nibbling their extremities (e.g., fingers) during sleep, indicating another potential human LASV infection route.
Furthermore, in rural areas in Ebonyi State, small rodents had easy access to homes due to the porous housing type. The poor hygiene and food storage systems attract rodents into homes, which might be responsible for the higher trapping success and LASV prevalence recorded in rural areas.
LASV in small rodents was widely distributed in various tissues, such as the kidneys, spleen, intestine, liver, lungs, testes, embryos, brain, and bone marrow, confirming the ability of the virus to cause multisystemic disease in humans (17, 24, 25). The detection of LASV in embryonic and fetal samples at nonspecific stages of gestation collected during this study is strongly suggestive of vertical transmission. Our study provides the first documented inference of LASV vertical transmission in a reservoir, initially proposed by Fichet-Calvet et al. (26). Furthermore, LASV detected in the testes of male rats suggests the presence of the virus in semen, with the possibility of transmission by coitus. The detection of LASV in the brain also confirms the ability of the virus to cross the blood-brain barrier, such as with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) in mice. The presence of the virus in cerebrospinal fluid as observed by Gunther et al. (27) equally supports the assertion that LASV can cross the blood-brain barrier. This observation may explain the pathogenesis of the neurological signs and hearing loss in some severe LF cases (28, 29).
Overall, we found that LASV is best detected in small rodent kidneys, spleen, testes, and embryos and least likely to be found in blood. This is probably due to the relatively short viraemic phase of LASV in the blood. However, subsequent sequestration of LASV in key organs such as kidneys, where there is persistent infection and shedding in the environment, may facilitate transmission. This remains a significant factor in sustaining zoonotic and inter- and intraspecies transmission.
In this study, our observation that trapped rodents tested positive year round might not be unconnected to the year-round reports of LF cases in Nigeria by the NCDC (6) in recent years.
In summary, this study found the highest prevalence of LASV among highly diverse rodents in LF-affected communities reported to date. These findings are correlated with the high Lassa case rates in the studied areas. The identification of a new reservoir species (Tatera spp.), as well as the high prevalence of LASV in a wide range of rodents, has direct implications for our understanding of transmission risk, mitigation, and ultimately prevention of LF in humans. The multiple species of LASV-positive rodents in communities of endemicity also suggest the complexity of the reservoir, with great interspecies transmission potential. PCR confirmation of positive testis and embryo samples is indicative of vertical and horizontal transmission. Lastly, testing of multiple tissues is recommended for a comprehensive and standardized rodent surveillance protocol for determining the zoonotic risks of LF in affected communities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethical approval.
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the institutional review boards (IRBs) at Redeemer’s University (Ede, Osun State, Nigeria).
Study sites.
Over a 2-year period (October to December 2018, January to December 2019, and January to April 2020), small rodents were trapped for sampling in Ebonyi State, located in southeastern Nigeria. In Owo, Ondo State, located in southwestern Nigeria, small rodents were trapped from August through October 2019. The climate is tropical with two distinct seasons (rainy and dry) in both states. The average temperature ranges between 21°C and 29°C, and the humidity is relatively high in Owo, Ondo State. In Ebonyi State, the average temperature is between 25.5°C and 28.8°C. Rainfall in Owo, Ondo State, decreases in amount and distribution from the coast to the hinterland.
The samples were collected from four communities in Owo Local Government Area (LGA), Ondo State (lat 7.1989, long 5.5932), and four communities within five LGAs in Ebonyi State (Fig. 1) (lat 6.3231, long 8.1120). The communities sampled in Owo, Ondo State, were Ijebu-Owo, Isuada, Iselu, and Ehin-Ogbe. The five LGAs in Ebonyi State where traps were set are Izzi (lat 6.38577, long 8.02549), Abakaliki (lat 6.323061, long 8.112012), Ezza North (lat 6.27083, long 7.97139), and Afikpo North (lat 5.88794, long 7.95307). The communities where sampling took place in Ebonyi State were Onu-Enyim, Agbaja, Oriuzor, and Afikpo.
Rodent trapping.
Rodents were captured using live-capture traps (H. B. Sherman Traps, Tallahassee, FL, USA) baited with a mixture of white oats, groundnut paste, and dried fish. Trapping location selection was based on communities with a history of laboratory-confirmed cases of LF. All the traps set were rebaited in the evening and checked the following morning for 4 consecutive days per week for the entire trap-setting period. The traps were set in homes, on farms, in bushes, and at dumpsites. In urban settings, traps were predominantly set in houses with a few at dumpsites. In rural areas, most traps were set in houses, with a few on farms and in bushes. The traps in homes were set along suspected rodent paths, while the traps on farms, in bushes, and at dumpsites were set in multiple-transect lines and were also flagged for easy tracking and retrieval. Bearing in mind that some houses were large and some small, an average of three traps were set in each room, kitchen, balcony, and storage area, resulting in an average of 15 traps per household. The total number of traps set varied between 90 and 120, depending on the number of consenting houses and their sizes at each location per night of trapping. The rodent capture success was calculated according to the protocol described by Dembi et al. (13). The trap success in a location was equal to the sum of the total catch in a location divided by the number of traps set each night in that location, multiplied by the number of trap nights and multiplied by 100.
Rodent identification, dissection, and sample collection.
Captured rodents were morphologically identified at the genus level. Biometric parameters such as weight, sex, entire length, and length of the ear, right foot, and tail were recorded. Other morphological characteristics were also noted, such as the color of the fur and its distribution/arrangement, the mammary gland arrangement and number (if a mature female rodent), the muzzle morphology, and the shape of the head. The results of species identification were confirmed through analysis of the mitochondrial genes after metagenomic sequencing of the viral RNA (5, 11) (A. N. Happi, unpublished data). The rodents were then sedated using chloroform. Blood was collected through cardiac puncture into sterile EDTA bottles. Tissue sections of approximately 0.3 to 0.5 cm3 comprising brain, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, intestine, bladder, testis, embryo, and bone marrow were obtained through sterile necropsy from the euthanized rodents and preserved in TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) for molecular studies.
RNA extraction and PCR.
Total RNA was extracted from small sections of tissue and 140 μL plasma using the QIAamp viral RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The samples were subjected to reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis for the detection of LASV using the Superscript III Platinum SYBR Green one-step qRT-PCR kit (Life Technologies, CA, USA) and specific primers targeting the L gene of the virus (LASV-NG forward, 5′-YAC AGG GTC YTC TGG WCG ACC-3′; LASV-NG reverse, 3′-RAT GAT GCA RCT TGA CCC AAG-5′) (14).
Statistical analysis.
The various data were analyzed using the Student t test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and chi-square tests. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Correlation analysis using the Pearson correlation coefficient was employed to determine the relationship between capture success and LASV prevalence.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by BBSRC-OVEL project BB/R020116/1 and Wellcome Trust project 216619/Z/19/Z.
Contributor Information
Anise N. Happi, Email: happia@run.edu.ng.
Christian T. Happi, Email: happic@run.edu.ng.
Matthew Zack Anderson, The Ohio State University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Olayemi A, Cadar D, Magassouba N, Obadare A, Kourouma F, Oyeyiola A, Fasogbon S, Igbokwe J, Rieger T, Bockholt S, Jérôme H, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Garigliany M, Lorenzen S, Igbahenah F, Fichet J-N, Ortsega D, Omilabu S, Günther S, Fichet-Calvet E. 2016. New hosts of the Lassa virus. Sci Rep 6:25280. doi: 10.1038/srep25280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siddle KJ, Eromon P, Barnes KG, Mehta S, Oguzie JU, Odia I, Schaffner SF, Winnicki SM, Shah RR, Qu J, Wohl S, Brehio P, Iruolagbe C, Aiyepada J, Uyigue E, Akhilomen P, Okonofua G, Ye S, Kayode T, Ajogbasile F, Uwanibe J, Gaye A, Momoh M, Chak B, Kotliar D, Carter A, Gladden-Young A, Freije CA, Omoregie O, Osiemi B, Muoebonam EB, Airende M, Enigbe R, Ebo B, Nosamiefan I, Oluniyi P, Nekoui M, Ogbaini-Emovon E, Garry RF, Andersen KG, Park DJ, Yozwiak NL, Akpede G, Ihekweazu C, Tomori O, Okogbenin S, Folarin OA, Okokhere PO, MacInnis BL, Sabeti PC, et al. 2018. Genomic analysis of Lassa virus during an increase in cases in Nigeria in 2018. N Engl J Med 379:1745–1753. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lecompte E, Fichet-Calvet E, Daffis S, Koulémou K, Sylla O, Kourouma F, Doré A, Soropogui B, Aniskin V, Allali B, Kouassi Kan S, Lalis A, Koivogui L, Günther S, Denys C, ter Meulen J. 2006. Mastomys natalensis and Lassa fever, West Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 12:1971–1974. doi: 10.3201/eid1212.060812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hamblion EL, Raftery P, Wendland A, Dweh E, Williams GS, George RNC, Soro L, Katawera V, Clement P, Gasasira AN, Musa E, Nagbe TK. 2018. The challenges of detecting and responding to a Lassa fever outbreak in an Ebola-affected setting. Int J Infect Dis 66:65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Safronetz D, Sogoba N, Lopez JE, Maiga O, Dahlstrom E, Zivcec M, Feldmann F, Haddock E, Fischer RJ, Anderson JM, Munster VJ, Branco L, Garry R, Porcella SF, Schwan TG, Feldmann H. 2013. Geographic distribution and genetic characterization of Lassa virus in sub-Saharan Mali. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC). 2021. Lassa fever situation report. https://reliefweb.int/report/nigeria/ncdc-lassa-fever-situation-report-epi-week-32-9-15-august-2021. Accessed 5 September 2021.
- 7.Monath TM, Newhouse VF, Kemp GE, Setzer HW, Cacciapuoti A. 1974. Lassa virus isolation from Mastomys natalensis rodents during an epidemic in Sierra Leone. Science 185:263–265. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4147.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Agbonlahor DE, Erah A, Agba IM, Oviasogie FE, Ehiaghe AF, Wankasi M, Eremwanarue OA, Ehiaghe IJ, Ogbu EC, Iyen RI, Abbey S, Tatfeng MY, Uhunmwangho J. 2017. Prevalence of Lassa virus among rodents trapped in three South-South states of Nigeria. J Vector Borne Dis 54:146–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Olayemi A, Oyeyiola A, Obadare A, Igbokwe J, Adesina AS, Onwe F, Ukwaja KN, Ajayi NA, Rieger T, Günther S, Fichet-Calvet E. 2018. Widespread arenavirus occurrence and seroprevalence in small mammals, Nigeria. Parasit Vectors 11:416. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2991-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fichet-Calvet E, Lecompte E, Koivogui L, Soropogui B, Doré A, Kourouma F, Sylla O, Daffis S, Koulémou K, Meulen JT. 2007. Fluctuation of abundance and Lassa virus prevalence in Mastomys natalensis in Guinea, West Africa. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 7:119–128. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2006.0520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Leski TA, Stockelman MG, Moses LM, Park M, Stenger DA, Ansumana R, Bausch DG, Lin B. 2015. Sequence variability and geographic distribution of Lassa virus, Sierra Leone. Emerg Infect Dis 21:609–618. doi: 10.3201/eid2104.141469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Karan LS, Makenov MT, Korneev MG, Sacko N, Boumbaly S, Bayadin RBAV, Gladysheva K, Kourouma AH, Toure MY, Kartashov AV, Shipovalov AM, Porshakov M, Koulibaly MY, Boiro. 2019. Lassa virus in the host rodent Mastomys nataliensis within urban areas of N’zerekore, Guinea. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/616466. [DOI]
- 13.Demby AH, Inapogui A, Kargbo K, Koninga J, Kourouma K, Kanu J, Coulibaly M, Wagoner KD, Ksiazek TG, Peters CJ, Rollin PE, Bausch DG. 2001. Lassa fever in Guinea: II. Distribution and prevalence of Lassa virus infection in small mammals. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 1:283–297. doi: 10.1089/15303660160025912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wulff H, Fabiyi A, Monath TP. 1975. Recent isolations of Lassa virus from Nigerian rodents. Bull World Health Organ 52:609–613. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yaro CA, Kogi E, Opara KN, Batiha GE-S, Baty RS, Albrakati A, Altalbawy FMA, Etuh IU, Oni JP. 2021. Infection pattern, case fatality rate and spread of Lassa virus in Nigeria. BMC Infect Dis 21:149. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-05837-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shah RR. 2017. Rapid response high-throughput extraction of biosafety level 4 viral nucleic acids. A thesis in the field of biology for the degree of master of liberal arts in extension studies. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Safronetz D, Lopez JE, Sogoba N, Traore' SF, Raffel SJ, Fischer ER, Ebihara H, Branco L, Garry RF, Schwan TG, Feldmann H. 2010. Detection of Lassa virus, Mali. Emerg Infect Dis 16:1123–1126. doi: 10.3201/eid1607.100146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yun NE, Walker DH. 2012. Pathogenesis of Lassa fever. Viruses 4:2031–2048. doi: 10.3390/v4102031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Forrester JV. 2018. Ebola virus and persistent chronic infection: when does replication cease? Ann Transl Med 6:S39. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.09.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Malvy D, McElroy AK, de Clerck H, Günther S, van Griensven J. 2019. Ebola virus disease. Lancet 393:936–948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33132-5. (Erratum, 393:2038, doi:.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bonwitt J, Sáez AM, Lamin J, Ansumana R, Dawson M, Buanie J, Lamin J, Sondufu D, Borchert M, Sahr F, Fichet-Calvet E, Brown H. 2017. At home with Mastomys and Rattus: human-rodent interactions and potential for primary transmission of Lassa virus in domestic spaces. Am J Trop Med Hyg 96:935–943. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fichet-Calvet E, Becker-Ziaja B, Koivogui L, Günther S. 2014. Lassa serology in natural populations of rodents and horizontal transmission. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 14:665–674. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Walker DH, Wulff H, Lange JV, Murphy FA. 1975. Comparative pathology of Lassa virus infection in monkeys, guinea-pigs, and Mastomys natalensis. Bull World Health Organ 52:523–534. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Richmond JK, Baglole DJ. 2003. Lassa fever: epidemiology, clinical features, and social consequences. BMJ 327:1271–1275. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Adewuyi GM, Fowotade A, Adewuyi BT. 2009. Lassa fever: another infectious menace. Af J Clin Exp Micro 10:144–155. doi: 10.4314/ajcem.v10i3.43407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Fichet-Calvet E, Lecompte E, Koivogui L, Daffis S, ter Meulen J. 2008. Reproductive characteristics of Mastomys natalensis and Lassa virus prevalence in Guinea, West Africa. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 8:41–48. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Günther S, Weisner B, Roth A, Grewing T, Asper M, Drosten C, Emmerich P, Petersen J, Wilczek M, Schmitz H. 2001. Lassa fever encephalopathy: Lassa virus in cerebrospinal fluid but not in serum. J Infect Dis 184:345–349. doi: 10.1086/322033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Okokhere PO, Ibekwe TS, Akpede GO. 2009. Sensorineural hearing loss in Lassa fever: two case reports. J Med Case Rep 3:36. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-3-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mateer EJ, Huang C, Shehu NY, Paessler S. 2018. Lassa fever-induced sensorineural hearing loss: a neglected public health and social burden. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12:e0006187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.