Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 19;10(4):e00262-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00262-22

TABLE 1.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the E. anophelis C08 strain

Antibiotics Breakpoint (µg/mL)a
EM361-97b
C08
S I R MIC (µg/mL) Result MIC (µg/mL) Result
Ticarcillin-clavulanate ≤16/2 32/2–64/2 ≥128/2 >64/2 I >128 R
Piperacillin-tazobactam ≤16/4 32/4–64/4 ≥128/4 16/4 S ≥128 R
Cefotaxime ≤8 16–32 ≥64 ND ND 32 I
Ceftazidime ≤8 16 ≥32 >16 I >32 R
Cefepime ≤8 16 ≥32 32 R >32 R
Ciprofloxacin ≤1 2 ≥4 >2 I >4 R
Tetracycline ≤4 8 ≥16 >8 I 128 R
Doxycycline ≤4 8 ≥16 ND ND 4 S
Minocycline ≤4 8 ≥16 <1 S 2 S
Tigecycline ≤2 4 ≥8 2 S 8 R
Colistin ≤2 ≥4 ND ND >4 R
Polymyxin B ≤2 ≥4 ND ND >4 R
Gentamicin ≤4 8 ≥16 >8 R >8 R
Amikacin ≤16 32 ≥64 >32 R >32 R
Levofloxacin ≤2 4 ≥8 >8 R 2 S
Aztreonam ≤8 16 ≥32 >16 I >16 R
Imipenem ≤4 8 ≥16 >8 I >8 R
Meropenem ≤4 8 ≥16 >8 I >8 R
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole ≤2/38 32/2–64/2 ≥4/76 >4/76 R 4 R
Chloramphenicol ≤8 16 ≥32 ND ND ≥64 R
a

MIC breakpoints (micrograms per milliliter) applied to isolates according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) “other non-Enterobacteriaceae” organisms (there are no interpretive criteria for the susceptibility of E. anophelis).

b

The MICs of E. anophelis EM361-97 were obtained from a previous study by Lin et al. (49). ND, not determined.