Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 13;57:101147. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101147

Table 2.

Summary of 28 studies from systematic review, with sample characteristics, measures used, neuroimaging tasks, and findings.

Authors
(Year)
Sample size, age (SD), sex, ethnicity Measure of substance use Timing of substance use Type of substance Task used in fMRI Contrast of interest Significant brain regions Summary of findings
Social Reward Category
Jarcho et al. (2022) N = 33
Mage = 21.88 (4.35)
64 % Female
Self-report via the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory-brief form (ESI-bf) Concurrent substance use Polydrug Peer Acceptance and Rejection Task Positive rewarding feedback > Non-rewarding feedback VS, substantia nigra, crus cerebri Decreased right VS response to social reward (positive rewarding feedback from a peer) was related to greater substance abuse behavior.
Zimmermann et al. (2019) N = 47
(n = 23 cannabis)
Mage = 23.76 (3.12)
100 % Male
Self-report Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Interpersonal Touch Paradigm Touch > Close
Female > Male
Striatum, insula Cannabis users showed less activity in the dorsal striatum with female experimenter touch, while non-users showed more striatal activity during interpersonal touch.
Li et al. (2021) N = 460
(Human Connectome Project)
Mage = 28.75 (3.6)
51.7 % Female
Self-report, perceived friendship Effects of substance use on neural function Alcohol Social Cognition Task (shapes interacting either socially or randomly) Social Interaction of abstract shapes > Non-Social Right posterior insula, mOFC, left ventral precuneus Binge drinkers, especially female, had less response in the mOFC and precuneus to social interactions of abstract shapes compared to random movement. Greater posterior insula activity was correlated with lower self-reported scores on perceived friendships.
Emotional Sensitivity Category
Aloi et al. (2018) N = 82 (n = 47 from a residential treatment facility)
Mage = 16.1 (1.32)
62.2 % Male
Self-report via AUDIT, CUDIT Concurrent substance use Polydrug Affective Stroop Task (Emotional Faces) Negative Emotion > Neutral Face
Positive Emotion > Neutral Face
Amygdala, precuneus, PCC, iPL AUDIT scores were positively associated with amygdala response to emotional stimuli (both negative and positive), but negatively with dACC, dlPFC, and precuneus. CUDIT scores were positively related to activity in the PCC, precuneus, and iPL, but not amygdala.
Blair et al. (2019) N = 87
Mage = 16.48 (1.17)
50.6 % Female
Self-report via AUDIT, CUDIT Concurrent substance use Polydrug Looming Task (Emotional Faces) Looming Stimulus > Receding Stimulus
Angry Face > Neutral Face
Rostral medial frontal cortex, left fusiform gyrus, right cerebellum CUDIT scores were negatively correlated with response to looming stimuli in the rmPFC, cerebellum, and fusiform gyrus. The pattern was similar for the amygdala, but not significant after correcting for multiple comparisons. Threatening stimuli were not related to CUDIT or AUDIT scores.
Chaplin et al. (2019) N = 66
Mage = 12.59 (0.70)
48.5 % Female, 71.2 % White
YRBS, Teen
Addiction Severity Index, urine screens, breathalyzer
Concurrent substance use Polydrug Emotional Photos (International Affective Picture System) Negative Emotion > Neutral Amygdala, ACC, AI In girls, greater insula response to negative stimuli was associated with more substance use. Boys did not show an association between neural response to emotional stimuli and substance use.
Cohen-Gilbert et al. (2022) N = 60
Mage = 18.9 (0.4)
55.5 % Female
AUDIT, Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (C- CAPS), Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (YAACQ) Concurrent substance use & effects on neural function Alcohol Emotional Go/No-Go with emotional photos (International Affective Picture System) Negative NoGo > Neutral NoGo Lateral frontoparietal networks (rL- FPN; lL- FPN), dorsal attention network (DAN), salience network (SN) Alcohol use and negative consequences of drinking were negatively associated with DAN recruitment to negative Go trials. This pattern suggests that in young adults with more problematic drinking, negative emotional information interferes more with engagement of neural networks involved in top- down attentional control, compared to those with less alcohol misuse.
Cohen-Gilbert et al. (2017) N = 23
Mage = 18.8 (0.4)
69.6 % Female
Self-report via AUDIT, Baratt Impulsiveness Scale Concurrent substance use & effects on neural function Alcohol Emotional Go/No-Go with emotional photos (International Affective Picture System) Negative NoGo > Neutral NoGo OFC, amygdala, MFG, frontal pole, iTG, occipital pole, precuneus, cerebellum Binge drinking was negatively associated with activity in the dlPFC, dmPFC, and AI. This pattern emerged for negative emotion only, and not positive emotion.
Elsayed et al. (2018) N = 330
(n = 32 early initiators)
Mage = 13.37 (1.08)
56 % White, 44 % Other Race
44 % Girls (early initiators)
50 % Girls (late initiators)
Self-report via Substance Use Questionnaire (SUQ) and Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire (AEQ) Effects of neural function on substance use initiation Polydrug Face-Matching Task (Angry and Fearful Faces), Card-Guessing Task (Monetary Reward) Angry and Fearful Faces > Neutral Shapes
Monetary Reward > Baseline
Amygdala, VS Adolescents who were classified as early initiators showed greater amygdala activation to fearful faces, compared to those classified as late initiators. Activity in the VS to monetary reward did not differ between groups.
Gorka et al. (2013) N = 12
Mage = 23.2 (1.8)
83.3 % Male, 66.7 % Caucasian
In-person screening; ingestion of alcohol (0.8 g/kg; 16% volume) or placebo (dextrose with 0.0 g/kg; 1% volume ethanol as a taste mask) Effects of substance use on neural function Alcohol Emotional Face Assessment Task Fearful Faces > Neutral Faces
Happy Faces > Neutral Faces
Amygdala, OFC, MTG, insula, precuneus, L supplementary motor area Alcohol ingestion led to reduced coupling between the amygdala and right OFC to faces, regardless of emotion (both threatening and happy faces). Alcohol also led to reduced coupling between amygdala and left OFC to happy faces.
Gorka et al. (2015) N = 16
Mage = 20.8 (2.6)
50 % Female
57.3 % Black, 31.8 % White, 6.4 % Hispanic, 5.5 % Asian
In-person screening; ingestion of THC (Marinol; 7.5 mg) or placebo (dextrose) Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Emotional Face Assessment Task Fearful Faces > Neutral Faces
Happy Faces > Neutral Faces
Amygdala, OFC, MTG, insula, precuneus, L supplementary motor area THC ingestion led to increased coupling between amygdala and subregions of the mPFC and rostral ACC while viewing threatening faces, compared to happy faces and neutral shapes.
Heitzeg et al. (2015) N = 40
Mage = 20.17 (1.38)
100 % Female
Interview and self-report Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Emotional Word task Negative Emotion > Neutral
Positive Emotion > Neutral
Insula, iPL, dlPFC, superior frontal gyrus, right calcarine fissure, frontal gyrus Heavy cannabis users had less activation to negative words in the right insula, PFC, and occipital cortex; less activation to positive words in the right iPL; less activation of amygdala to emotion (positive or negative); and higher dlPFC to positive words. PFC to negative words mediated adolescent cannabis use and young-adult negative emotionality.
Herman et al. (2019) N = 30
Mage = 23.40 (5.01)
70 % Female
Self-report via Alcohol Use Questionnaire Concurrent substance use Alcohol Affective Stop-Signal Task (Faces),
Affective Delay Discounting Task (Faces)
Fearful Faces > Neutral Faces Lateral OFC, angular gyrus, left frontal pole, superior parietal lobule, postcentral gyrus More binge drinking was linked to more activity during successful inhibition in the fearful context within frontal and parietal regions. More binge drinking was also related with a steeper decrease in frontal pole activity while making delayed decisions in the fearful context.
Leiker et al. (2019) N = 123
Mage = 15.95 (1.23)
63 % Male
Self-report via AUDIT and CUDIT Concurrent substance use Polydrug Face-Identifying Task (Fearful and Happy Faces) Fearful Faces >Neutral
Happy Faces > Neutral
Emotional Faces (combined) > Neutral
ACC, vmPFC, lingual gyrus, medial temporal pole, iPL Adolescents’ AUD scores were negatively correlated with vmPFC and lingual gyrus responses to emotional faces (both fearful and happy), and CUD scores negatively correlated with rostromedial PFC (including the ACC). Greater alcohol use was linked to higher iPL response to fearful faces.
Nikolova et al. (2016) N = 170
Mage = 19.55 (1.26)
61.2 % Female
45 % Caucasian, 26 % Asian, 18 % African-American, 6 % Bi/Multi-racial, 5% other
Self-report Effects of neural function on substance use initiation Alcohol Face-Matching Task (Emotion), Number-Guessing Task (Reward) Fearful Faces > Neutral Faces
Positive Reward Feedback > Negative Reward Feedback
VS, NAcc, amygdala Higher risk for stress-related problem drinking was associated with (1) high VS response to reward and low amygdala response to threat, and (2) low VS response to reward and high amygdala response to threat.
Spechler et al. (2015) N = 140 (IMAGEN)
Mage = 14.69 (0.53)
71.4 % Male (Cannabis users), 58.6 % Male (Non-using controls)
In-person screening Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Emotion Video facial task (video clips of faces turning angry) Negative Emotional Stimuli > Neutral PFC, amygdala, hippocampus, striatum Adolescents who tried cannabis showed greater activity to angry faces in the amygdala, and those who had never tried cannabis showed lower TPJ to angry faces as well as higher activity to neutral faces in the bilateral dlPFC and right TPJ.
Spechler et al. (2020) N = 1119 (IMAGEN)
Mage = 14.41 (0.4)
54.6 % Female
Self-report via Alcohol and Other Drugs questionnaire Effects of neural function on substance use initiation Cannabis Face Processing task Angry Faces > Neutral Faces Amygdala Heightened amygdala response to angry faces at age 14 predicted greater use of cannabis by age 19, and the lowest amygdala activation was seen in adolescents who remained abstinent by age 19 in a dose-dependent pattern. Amygdala activation at age 19 did not differ between cannabis users and non-users.
Sullivan et al. (2022) N = 66 (34 Cannabis users with 50 + lifetime occasions or 40 + in last year)
Mage = 21.3 (2.27)
47 % Female
64 % Caucasian
Self-report via Timeline Follow Back (TLFB), Customary Drinking and Drug Use Record (CDDR) Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Emotional Go/No-Go Fearful Faces > Calm Faces Rostral ACC Decreased left and right rACC activation was found during successful inhibition with fearful faces, in cannabis users (abstinent at time of study) compared to non-users. Greater connectivity between right rACC and right cerebellum was found during successful inhibition with calm faces for male cannabis users, compared to female cannabis users.
Swartz et al. (2017) N = 377
Mage = 19.8 (1.3)
59 % Female
48 % Caucasian, 32 % Asian, 9 % African-American, 7 % Bi/Multi-racial, 4 % other
Self-report via AUDIT Effects of neural function on substance use initiation Alcohol Emotional Face Assessment Task Fearful Faces > Neutral Faces Basolateral and centromedial amygdala Greater amygdala activity to fearful faces was linked to peer-reported (but not self-reported) lower extraversion and higher conscientiousness. Conscientiousness was in turn related to problem drinking in men, but not women. Amygdala response indirectly predicted males’ drinking via conscientiousness.
Social Sensitivity Category
Blair et al. (2021) N = 102
Mage = 16.54 (1.26)
66 % Male
Self-report via AUDIT, CUDIT Concurrent substance use Polydrug Retaliation Task (modified Ultimatum Game) Retaliation Phase > Baseline vmPFC, dmPFC, AI, caudate, periaqueductal gray, middle frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus AUD scores were positively associated with brain activity during retaliation in the dmPFC, AI, and caudate, representing an exaggerated retaliation response. CUD scores were not significantly associated with neural response during the retaliation task.
Chung et al. (2020) N = 78
(n = 46 substance-naïve)
Mage = 15.92 (0.78)
79 % White
54 % Male for substance-naïve
38% Male for substance-exposed
Self-report via YRBS Effects of substance use on neural function Polydrug Gambling Task with risky and safe choices, completed alone or after viewing peers’ choices Safe choices by peer > Solo
Risky choices by peer > Solo
vmPFC, dmPFC, amygdala, temporal pole, right STS, left TPJ, precuneus, PCC Substance-naïveté is linked to increased valuation of peers’ safer choices, as adolescents who never used substances showed stronger neural response while observing safe choices. Further, vmPFC activity while viewing peers’ safe choices was negatively related with substance exposure.
Gilman et al. (2016) N = 40
Mage = 20.9 (2.1)
100 % Female
Self-report Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Social Influence Task Conformity > Deviation NAcc, VS, caudate, PFC Cannabis users showed more NAcc activation while following group influence, and greater activity was associated with greater cannabis use. cannabis users showed more dorsal caudate activation during the feedback phase.
Gilman et al. (2016) N = 43
Mage = 21.1 (2.2)
52.4 % Female
Self-report, Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS) Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Social Influence Task Conformity > Deviation dlPFC, dmPFC, vlPFC, vmPFC, IFG, PPC Susceptibility to social influence was positively correlated with caudate response to social influence, and reaction time with activity in frontal and parietal regions. Cannabis users showed more IFG activity, while non-using controls showed more dlPFC activity.
Groefsema et al. (2020) N = 153
Mage = 22.78 (1.84)
100 % Male
Online screening; Self-report Concurrent substance use Alcohol Social‐Alcohol Cue‐Exposure (SACE) task, Beer‐Incentive‐Delay (BID) task Social > Non-Social
Alcohol > Soda
ACC, vmPFC, superior frontal gyrus, VS, iPL, left STS, right TPJ Alcohol cues (versus soda) elicited more VS and vmPFC activity. Social cues (versus non-social) elicited ACC, VS, and vmPFC. Social alcohol cues elicited STS and L-IPL.
Social Stress
Beard at al. (2021) N = 181
Mage = 17.16 (0.44)
49.3 % Female, 100 % Mexican-American
Self-report Effects of neural function on substance use initiation Polydrug Cyberball (Social Exclusion) Social Exclusion > Social Inclusion sgACC, dACC, AI dACC activity moderated the link between anxiety and substance use, such that adolescents with lower dACC response reported greater substance use when also reporting higher anxiety.
Gilman et al. (2016) N = 42
Mage = 21.05 (2.2)
52.4 % Female
Self- report, Multidimensional Iowa Suggestibility Scale (MISS) Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Cyberball (Social Exclusion) Social Exclusion > Social Inclusion vACC, right insula Non-cannabis using controls showed insula activity during exclusion, but cannabis users did not. Both groups had vACC response to exclusion. Conformity was positively correlated with vACC in cannabis users (but not controls).
Shakra et al. (2018) N = 48 (n = 24 high anxiety, 24 high sensation-seeking)
Mage = 20.4 (1.9)
48 % Female, 81 % White, 5 % Asian, 12 % Other, 2 % Unknown
Michigan Alcohol Screening Test, AUD symptoms from Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: (SCID-NP), Experimental administration of 1 ml/kg of 95% USP alcohol, p.o. Effects of substance use on neural function Alcohol Face Emotion Processing Task (FEPT; Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces set), Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) Negative Faces (averaged fearful, disgusted, angry, sad) > Neutral Faces
Stress > No Stress
AI, amygdala, mOFC, NAcc, perigenual ACC Anxious young adults showed less amygdala response to threat after ingesting alcohol, which predicted problem drinking at follow-up. Anxious men (but not women) showed increased mOFC, pgACC and NAcc activity during stress.
Sensation seeking men (but not women) showed decreased mOFC during stress after ingesting alcohol, which predicted problem drinking at follow-up.
Zhao et al. (2019) N = 51
(n = 28 cannabis users)
Mage = 25.05 (4.33)
100 % Male
In-person screening Effects of substance use on neural function Cannabis Montreal Imaging Stress Task (MIST) Stress > No Stress Precuneus, dmPFC Cannabis users had decreased stress-related reactivity in the precuneus, and increased connectivity between the precuneus and dmPFC. Behaviorally, they performed worse in the social stress condition, but not the no-stress condition.

Note: AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test; CUDIT = Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test; YRBS = Youth Risk Behavior Survey; PFC = prefrontal cortex; OFC = orbitofrontal cortex; ACC = anterior cingulate cortex; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; PPC = posterior parietal cortex; VS = ventral striatum; NAcc = nucleus accumbens; AI = anterior insula; MTG = medial temporal gyrus; STS = superior temporal sulcus; TPJ = temporoparietal junction; iPL = inferior parietal lobule; iTG = inferior temporal gyrus; v = ventral; d = dorsal; r = rostral; l = lateral; m = medial; sg = subgenual.