Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;7(4):100525. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100525

Table 1.

Detection rate according to personal and family history

Category Gene panel
CDKN2A
Non-CDKN2A
CDK4
BAP1
ATM
POT1
MITF
Mut % Mut % Mut % Mut % Mut % Mut % Mut % Mut %
Fam 2 CM cases (N = 373)a 34 9.12 21 5.63 14 3.75 0 0 1 0.27 6 1.61 3 0.8 4 1.07
Fam 3 or more CM cases (N = 101) 14 13.9 10 9.9 4 3.96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3.96
spoMPM 2 CM events (N = 253) 13 5.14 8 3.16 5 1.98 0 0 0 0 1 0.4 0 0 4 1.58
spoMPM 3 or more CM events(N = 122) 16 13.1 9 7.38 7 5.74 1 0.82 1 0.82 0 0 1 0.82 4 3.28
Syndromic (N = 91) 12 13.2 4 4.4 8 8.79 0 0 3 3.3 3 3.3 0 0 2 2.2
Total (N = 940) 89 9.47 52 5.53 38 4.04 1 0.11 5 0.53 10 1.06 4 0.43 18 1.91
P value 0.016 0.11 0.052

The table shows the rate of PVs/LPVs in each gene depending on personal and family history, and the corresponding Fisher’s exact test derived P value.

Significant P values are marked in bold.

CM, cutaneous melanoma; Fam, familial cases; LPV, likely pathogenic variant; N, number of cases; Mut, number of cases with a PV/LPV; PV, pathogenic variant; spoMPM, apparently sporadic multiple primary melanoma cases.

a

One case had both an MITF PV and an ATM LPV.