Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;7(4):100517. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100517

Table 1.

Patient demographics and baseline characteristics

Tislelizumab (n = 256) ICC (n = 256)
Age, median (range), years 62.0 (40-86) 63.0 (35-81)
 <65 years, n (%) 157 (61.3) 161 (62.9)
 ≥65 years, n (%) 99 (38.7) 95 (37.1)
Sex, n (%)
 Male 217 (84.8) 215 (84.0)
 Female 39 (15.2) 41 (16.0)
Geographic region,an (%)
 Asia 201 (78.5) 203 (79.3)
 Europe/North America 55 (21.5) 53 (20.7)
ECOG performance status, n (%)
 0 66 (25.8) 60 (23.4)
 1 190 (74.2) 196 (76.6)
PD-L1 expression, n (%)
 TAP ≥10% 89 (34.8) 68 (26.6)
 TAP <10% 116 (45.3) 140 (54.7)
 Unknown 51 (19.9) 48 (18.8)
Smoking status, n (%)
 Never smoker 68 (26.6) 63 (24.6)
 Current/former smoker 188 (73.4) 192 (75.0)
 Missing 0 (0.0) 1 (0.4)
Previous therapies, n (%)
 Surgery 94 (36.7) 99 (38.7)
 Radiotherapy 169 (66.0) 163 (63.7)
 Platinum-based chemotherapy 249 (97.3) 252 (98.4)
Disease stage at study entry, n (%)
 Locally advanced 5 (2.0) 20 (7.8)
 Metastatic 251 (98.0) 236 (92.2)

ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ICC, investigator-chosen chemotherapy; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; TAP, tumor abnormal protein.

a

There were 50 patients from Japan: 25 patients in the tislelizumab arm and 25 patients in the chemotherapy arm.