Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 25;12(9):jkac177. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac177

Table 2.

Testing mh transgenes for modulation of interspecific F1 hybrid viability

Set Maternal genotype # F1 hybrid daughters # F1 hybrid sons Ratio F1 daughters/sons Relative ratio w/o and w transgene P-Value
A w 760 1106 0.69
w; {mel-mh-Gfp}1029/+ 766 1105 0.69 0.99 0.895
B w 781 1144 0.68
w; {mel-mh-Gfp}1048/+ 830 1124 0.74 0.92 0.228
C w 144 211 0.68
w; {sim-mh-Gfp}1029/+ 84 88 0.95 0.71 0.0722
D w 248 529 0.47
w; {sim-mh-Gfp}1048/+ 461 693 0.67 0.70 0.000331

In the following descriptions, all flies are D. simulans unless noted otherwise. The designation {mh-Gfp, w+} refers to one of the 4 transgenic genotypes used in this table. The flies described in the “Maternal genotype” column were generated as follows: (1) w501 virgin females were crossed to y w/Y; {mh-Gfp, w+} males. (2) w501/y w; {mh-Gfp, w+}/+ virgin daughters were crossed to w501/Y males. (3) For each set, y? w/w501; {mh-Gfp, w+}/+ and y? w/w501 virgin daughters were separately collected. The females from step (3) were then mated to D. melanogaster Canton-S males. The full genotypes of the transgenes are noted in the Materials and Methods. P-Values were calculated using a 2 × 2 Chi-squared test.