Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 11;190(1):516–531. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac278

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison between Kasalath and OsEPFL2 mutant plants for number of epidermis cells and cell size. A, Scanning electron microscopy photographs of epidermis cells in Kasalath, OsEPFL2cas1, and OsEPFL2cas2. B, Comparison of cell number in longitudinal direction among Kasalath and OsEPFL2cas1 and OsEPFL2cas2. C, Comparison of cell number in transverse direction among Kasalath, OsEPFL2cas1, and OsEPFL2cas2. D, Comparison of cell length among Kasalath, OsEPFL2cas1, and OsEPFL2cas2. E, Comparison of cell width among Kasalath, OsEPFL2cas1, and OsEPFL2cas2. The epidermal number, cell length, and cell width in longitudinal/transverse direction of the grain hull from 15 seeds was counted using the Image J. Values are given as mean ± sd, *P < 0.05; compared with the Kasalath by Student’s t test.